I agree though.People say that Pascal was about as good as Berto.Well guess what?Berto got beaten by Ortiz,not Pacman or Floyd.The #3 ranked welterweight untouched by 2 of boxing's best.Pascal was a real champion & a 46 year old fighter beat him.Is Pascal garbage,hell naw,but B-Hop is a legend.To those that say 175 is garbage,have U bothered to take a look at 147??:dunno:
I don't hate Hopkins but he avoided Chad Dawson like the plague. His favorite saying was why would he fight a "young lion". He over uses that term WAY too much.
Now that Dawson has lost, he wants to fight him.
I never considered Dawson a true threat to hopkins, even at 46-50 years old. I always say style make fights and dawson laid back, slow style is taylor made for Hopkins. Dawson doesnt apply pressure or throw a lot of punches, i think hopkins out points him....
Even if hopkins did dodge or duck dawson according to you, he still beats him.
i guess that's another way of saying 'omfg i got owned'.
nah... just checked your post history and youll never own anyone here. your knowledge of the sport is just way insufficient. dont get butthurt, just telling the truth
they should learn that being a top name in boxing doesnt mean that all they gotta do is take easy, no risk, unnecessary money fights. thats all
I don't hate Hopkins but he avoided Chad Dawson like the plague. His favorite saying was why would he fight a "young lion". He over uses that term WAY too much.
Now that Dawson has lost, he wants to fight him.
they should learn that being a top name in boxing doesnt mean that all they gotta do is take easy, no risk, unnecessary money fights. thats all
just tell wifebeater to call todd dubeouf.
You got a point for Floyd but for Pac, really??
2x Marquez
2x Barrera
3x Morales
Jolis
Diaz
Cotto
Hatton
De La Hoya
Mosley
Margarito
Clottey.
Thats a more impressive resume than BHop imo.
pacs resume is better than bhop, but thats not my point.
pacs last 2 fights were against marg and shane
wow, would you even dare to compare. steward doesnt have any agenda or anything against pascal to call him that. while the mayweathers sure arent a credible source when it comes to comments for pac.
you missed the point. try again
You got a point for Floyd but for Pac, really??
2x Marquez
2x Barrera
3x Morales
Jolis
Diaz
Cotto
Hatton
De La Hoya
Mosley
Margarito
Clottey.
Thats a more impressive resume than BHop imo.
just like how the mayweathers call pac an amateur? does it really matter? no.
wow, would you even dare to compare. steward doesnt have any agenda or anything against pascal to call him that. while the mayweathers sure arent a credible source when it comes to comments for pac.
LMFAO
pac and floyd's tuneups are better than the top fighters hopkins is fighting.
175 is garbage.
and the reason hopkins doesn't have "money" fights is not because of choice.
:lol1:
Yeah, dumb thread. Hopkins was fighting Roy Jones last year for money. He wouldn't fight Dawson after Pavlik because of money. He most likely will try to not fight Dawson now because of money.
People stop fooling yourselves, if Hopkins could do what Pacquiao and Mayweather do, he would, and it's okay the guy is at the end of his career. Don't act like he's some shining beacon of fighting top fighters right now though. He's had fights not happen because of ego and money just like Pacquiao and Mayweather.
I feel like the various sanctioning bodies should order a mandatory fight between Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao, for the sake of boxing, (just like they order mandatory challenges, etc.). I don't get how one boxer's ego can dictate the state of the game.
LMFAO
pac and floyd's tuneups are better than the top fighters hopkins is fighting.
175 is garbage.
and the reason hopkins doesn't have "money" fights is not because of choice.
:lol1: