hundred different threads about the same thing? Dumbass threads posted about Floyd in retaliation for dumbass threads posted about Pac (and vice versa. Scanning through the 1st page there's probably about twenty threads about four or five different topics.
A new thread everytime a Floyd home movie gets released (a new thread for EACH VIDEO), random b.s. threads about "Floyd/Pac would DESTROY so and so" only based on their dislike of the other fighter.
This **** is beyond ridiculous. I mean, you can't even keep all the **** together. I went to see if there were any responses to a post I made in a Manny thread the other day, and spent several minutes looking through the entire thread, before realizing it was a different thread about the same thing the other thread was about. Nearly the same headline as well.
At what point does this stop being the wild wild west of message boards, and there start being some type of uniformity and cohesion implemented?
I know I'm fairly new here, but this is crazy. It's to the point I can't even navigate the forum to find an ACTUAL topic to discuss, because so many dumb posts that have nothing to do with anything are clogging up the forum.
and since you are already at it MODs why not make another thread for WHINERS too so posters like the TS have a forum to vent on. nyahahaha
lol.
http://files.sharenator.com/GMDC_TOUCHE_Sharenator_Moti_Posters-s355x453-79984-535.jpg
Done. I still say a better implemented plan would be to limit topics to ONE THREAD each.
1 thread for the Floyd videos. 1 thread for ESPN people ****ting on Floyd. 1 thread for the Manny PED stuff. and so on.
Instead of having five different threads all saying the same thing.
and since you are already at it MODs why not make another thread for WHINERS too so posters like the TS have a forum to vent on. nyahahaha
How well does the "IGNORE" function work here? Does it completely erase that person's posts from your view, or is it a situation where you still see "so and so posted, click here to view it"?
Because we could just individually decide to "ignore" people who tend to post ignorant pac/floyd stuff, so it would be as if they never posted at all. So we wouldn't see those threads.
But if it's just the place holder there saying they posted and you can click it, then that's a wash.
That's why I have the little thing in at the bottom of my signature. Seriously people, add it!
It's not gonna work, it's been asked for over a year. Different posters have asked for it, the best posters, the worst posters.
Admins put a chat thingy like in Facebook, where you can live chat, in the bottom of your page, it was taken off after too many posters complaining about it. They also made a game room forum, where you can play games like chess, checkers, poker, etc with other posters, it was taken down because posters found a bug to make a serious amount of points, I heard.
Okay, they can put things like those, the gameroom was fun and all, I enjoyed it playing chess with other posters but they can't make a special boxing forum for Mayweather-Pacquiao topics?
c'mon mods... give pac and gayweather threads it's own forum so flomos stop cluttering NSB first page
yeah, cause Pac fans don't do the exact same thing.
Done. I still say a better implemented plan would be to limit topics to ONE THREAD each.
1 thread for the Floyd videos. 1 thread for ESPN people ****ting on Floyd. 1 thread for the Manny PED stuff. and so on.
Instead of having five different threads all saying the same thing.
Well that can be implemented within that individual forum so that, gulp, intelligent conversation actually about Pac-Mayweather may happen!
That's why I have the little thing in at the bottom of my signature. Seriously people, add it!
Done. I still say a better implemented plan would be to limit topics to ONE THREAD each.
1 thread for the Floyd videos. 1 thread for ESPN people ****ting on Floyd. 1 thread for the Manny PED stuff. and so on.
Instead of having five different threads all saying the same thing.
Also, there's the issue of the subtle (and not so subtle in some cases) racist signatures that some people have on here.
But some forums are not as strict on that, so ... I dunno.