There is no way possible SRR wouldve did to Hatton, Cotto and Marg what Pac did.

You still in this thread bro? ^^^

Damn .. little Pac is driving some of you crazy. :lol1: Nooo wayyyy he can do this.. or that. They are fantasy fights fellas.

Some people make it so obvious that they don't know their boxing history that's it's just plain sad to see them even ask such ****! Pacquiao although a great fighter & an all time great has flaws like most fighters & those 3 fighters you named would exploit those flaws to the point where I believe all three would not only beat him but by KO. I know that some of you guys on here are diehard PAC fans & naturally because of it are biased in his favor to the point where somebody actually made a thread that PAC is better than Sugar Ray Robinson which (SMFH & sadly too) is indicative of how little if any that person knows about boxing since Sugar Ray Robinson would beat all three in Leonard,Hearns,& Duran & those 3 would beat PAC. Let's see I'll break it down one by one starting with Hearns. Do you guys remember how much trouble Morales gave PAC in their first fight because of his use of a long & steady jab everytime PAC moved forward to disrupt his rhythm & then pop him with a right cross? Well if you know anything about Hearns then you would know that he would keep PAC at his desired range & the moment PAC tried coming inside he would be disconnected from his senses by one punch......Hearn's murderous right cross! If you guys think PAC is heavy handed believe me when I tell you that he aint got **** on Hearns because Hearns was a monster puncher who ranks really high on the all time punchers list. Remember that one punch KO of Hatton by PAC well Hearns has one just like that but his victim was Duran & with one right cross. I like PAC but Hearns brutally KO's him inside of 6 rounds. If he fought Duran it would be one of the best wars ever because they both just love fighting & it would be his most competitive fight because Duran would just flat out try to maul him but Duran had really good head movement unlike Hatton. I say PAC does well but due to accumulation of punishment gets KO'd late in the fight or Roach stops the fight. PAC would be facing an animal who loves to fight more than he does & that's something he's never seen. The thing about Duran is that not only did he love to fight but he was a mean & I really mean "mean ass" mother****er,he was menacing,rude,intimidating but was born to fight. Duran is one fighter who would psychologically beat the warrior out of PAC in the first few rounds & he would be the one to walk down PAC the same way PAC walked down Cotto! Duran stops PAC late or the Roach throws in the towel, matter of fact Roach even has said that Duran beats PAC. Now onto Ray Leonard, if Marquez gave PAC hell with superior technique & counterpunching Leonard would just outclass PAC,he would frustrate the **** out him then when PAC got reckless due to the frustration he would pick him apart. He would really exploit PAC's flaws. Everytime PAC attacked he would wait for PAC to get off balance & drop him with slick ass counterpunches. Leonard not only was a superb pure boxer/counterpuncher but he also punched pretty damn hard & to top it off he was slick like a snail in a barrel of oil so hell no PAC does not beat him. Leonard was a sharpshooter with stamina & he would KO PAC late as well. Now I know that you didnt ask about Sugar Ray Robinson but since I saw some idiot make a thread about PAC being better than him I figured I would enlighten that genius because I'm sure he'll read this thread since it concerns PAC. Robinson at 147 is considered thee absolute best fighter to ever lace them up ever! Way before all these alphabet titles ****ed up boxing Robinson was actually cleaning out entire divisions & the moving up to fight the best each division had to offer. Robinson was a tall,fast,murderous puncher with either hand & an iron chin. He could box,brawl,counterpunch do what ever you wanted to do & if it didn't work as well as he wanted to then he would just try to kill you flat out. Walk right to you & give you his signature 3 or 4 punch body attack & then try to take your head off because he finished that combination with hooks to the head. Remember how PAC sliced up Margarito with speed but couldn't knock him out with one shot? Well Robinson started boxing at 126 or 130 & was knocking out middleweights later in his career with one shot! & I'm talking about middleweights of that Era. Robinson would KO both Duran & Hearns for sure because of their aggression & Leonard might go the distance because of how slick he is but Robinson still beats him just ask Leonard. Muhammad Ali has said that he is the greatest heavyweight of all time but that the best fighter of all time pound for pound ever is Sugar Ray Robinson! Robinson vs PAC ? Robinson kills him, ruins him too! Just a comment for Hugh Grant/Bert Sugar! LOL!

This Forum has been taken over by LITTLE KIDS who THINK THEY KNOW ABOUT BOXING lol :nonono: I love how people try to call SRR, Henry Armstrong and other guys WHO ARE ALREADY REGARDED AS LEGENDS..."OVERRATED" hahaha that is LAUGHABLE! They speak in absolutes as if what they are saying is 100% CORRECT AND ACCURATE and everybody else is WRONG lol Pacquiao and Mayweather are the ones being OVERRATED IMO, especially by fans who only been following boxing for about 2-3 years since Mayweather and Pacquiao became POPULAR Neither would have survived in the FANTASTIC 4 ERA (Hagler, Hearns, Duran, Leonard), NEITHER would have made it past Duran at 135, not even sure if they make it out of Aaron Pryor/Alexis Arguello ERA at 140 Neither of them probably would have fought those guys just like they are doing now...THEY BOTH CHERRY PICK! Only difference is that Arum does the ducking/cherry picking for Pacquiao and Mayweather does it HIMSELF lol Don't worry about Past Legends, their legacy can't be taken away from them as much as many of you WISH you could take it away from them, Mayweather and Pacquiao are trying to get the RESPECT THEY HAVE/HAD Regardless of how you Rate SSR, one of the 1st Names that comes up when you start discussing the greatest fighters of all times is SSR...NOT PACQUIAO...NOT MAYWEATHER...unless maybe your under the age of 18 or you just started really watching boxing I agree with everything you just said...

Yeah because calling someone a little kid is "SO DISRESPECTFUL"....what should I call them "Pactards" or "Flomos", people who use names like that are the ones you should QUESTIONING as far as MATURITY! :nonono: that too. oh, and name-calling isn't disrespectful. its childish.

i always question the maturity of people who call those who disagree with them as little kids and don't know about boxing. Yeah because calling someone a little kid is "SO DISRESPECTFUL"....what should I call them "Pactards" or "Flomos", people who use names like that are the ones you should QUESTIONING as far as MATURITY! :nonono:

it is impossible to properly predict how SRR would have performed against these fighters. they fought under different rules back then, the training they went through was different then, heck even the food they ate was different. (in the sense that we don't know what kind of chemicals they put on our food is) heck, its even difficult to accurately predict how our current fighters would fare against each other, how much more fighters who lived and fought decades before? they trained harder ate better and fought under tougher rules back then. for a more recent example its why kobe will never be as good as jordan.

This is the same guy that said Cotto beat Mosley in his prime, and that Pacquiao beat DLH at his natural weight.

In my opinion,there are 2.B-Hop & Martinez.Some people agree,some disagree.But that doesn't change the fact that there is a legit argument from all stances.B-Hop,because of his impressive run at 160,winning big as an underdog & his longevity.Martinez because his last 3 fights were against real fighters,none old,shot or unrated. I can agree with B-Hop, but Martinez? Sergio had a good run in his last 3 fights i agree but Manny had been fighting top/hof fighters since bantamweight/featherweight, Ledwaba, Barrera, Morales, Marquez, and continued on to WW, Hatton, Cotto, Clottey, the MW Maragrito and now Mosley. Sergio's big wins were Pavlik and Williams but lost to Margarito and a draw to Cintron, not quite impressive to me...

I'm pretty sure SRR will be as or maybe more dominating if he wouldve fought hatton, cotto, and marg. who knows, we need a time machine to find out. it is impossible to properly predict how SRR would have performed against these fighters. they fought under different rules back then, the training they went through was different then, heck even the food they ate was different. (in the sense that we don't know what kind of chemicals they put on our food is) heck, its even difficult to accurately predict how our current fighters would fare against each other, how much more fighters who lived and fought decades before?

Was this really worth making a thread over? Considering people say stupid things all the time on this forum lol.

This Forum has been taken over by LITTLE KIDS who THINK THEY KNOW ABOUT BOXING lol :nonono: i always question the maturity of people who call those who disagree with them as little kids and don't know about boxing.

This Forum has been taken over by LITTLE KIDS who THINK THEY KNOW ABOUT BOXING lol :nonono: I love how people try to call SRR, Henry Armstrong and other guys WHO ARE ALREADY REGARDED AS LEGENDS..."OVERRATED" hahaha that is LAUGHABLE! They speak in absolutes as if what they are saying is 100% CORRECT AND ACCURATE and everybody else is WRONG lol Pacquiao and Mayweather are the ones being OVERRATED IMO, especially by fans who only been following boxing for about 2-3 years since Mayweather and Pacquiao became POPULAR Neither would have survived in the FANTASTIC 4 ERA (Hagler, Hearns, Duran, Leonard), NEITHER would have made it past Duran at 135, not even sure if they make it out of Aaron Pryor/Alexis Arguello ERA at 140 Neither of them probably would have fought those guys just like they are doing now...THEY BOTH CHERRY PICK! Only difference is that Arum does the ducking/cherry picking for Pacquiao and Mayweather does it HIMSELF lol Don't worry about Past Legends, their legacy can't be taken away from them as much as many of you WISH you could take it away from them, Mayweather and Pacquiao are trying to get the RESPECT THEY HAVE/HAD Regardless of how you Rate SSR, one of the 1st Names that comes up when you start discussing the greatest fighters of all times is SSR...NOT PACQUIAO...NOT MAYWEATHER...unless maybe your under the age of 18 or you just started really watching boxing

I'm pretty sure SRR will be as or maybe more dominating if he wouldve fought hatton, cotto, and marg. who knows, we need a time machine to find out.

Hopkins>>>Pacquiao. Father time will whip that bass.

there's fighters fighting BETTER, TOUGHER competition....thats for sure!!....his wack choices in opponents might come back to bite him on the ass on May 7th no disrespect bro but arent you a mosley fan who is expecting him to win?....

Exactly the reason why I hang out in the lounge most of the time now. The NSB forum has become a graveyard of dumb fanboy threads.

Pacquiao's rise through the weights is incredible, no doubt about that, but when you're looking at it from an all-time perspective, you have to consider what he did at each of those weights. Take lightweight for instance. He beat up David Diaz, by far the weakest belt holder in that division, a C-level fighter in general... and that's it. It's not like he cleared out any of these divisions. Is this more impressive than completely dominating a single division for over a decade? Maybe. Probably, even. I mean, for a guy who started at 108lbs to fight for a light middleweight title is pretty miraculous. But we'll only truly see just where Pacquiao stands all-time once he retires, especially if he fights Mayweather before doing so. see why i said you have to be completely irrational to say you have acase of bhop being better than pac.?......i wonder why you picked diaz who was pac's weakest opponet he won a title from?...lol......bhop has plent of wins like that ..infact majority of his titl defenses were againts david diaz's...here:...since bhop and pac are from the same era, if bhop is better than pac, dont you think he would've won the fighter of the decade award instead of pac?.....

are you implying there is a fighter better than pac right now?.... there's fighters fighting BETTER, TOUGHER competition....thats for sure!!....his wack choices in opponents might come back to bite him on the ass on May 7th

These threads are hilarious. Just goes to show the type of casual fans there are.