Who fought more of a 'shot' fighter. De La Hoya or Pacquiao?

Besides Mayweather and Pacquiao, he'd beat everyone else at 147 right now. Though that isn't saying much to be honest. If you're honest, as you wish us to believe, and you are not saying much, which I believe, tconsidering what you ARE ACTUALLY saying, maybe the less you say....the BETTER.

Even a 60 year old Whitaker is better than fishnet's so who gives a ****?

Dude You need to put Mayweather namme instead he's like the champion boxer in fighting senior citizen boxers or little guys who call him out.

whitaker got robbed by Oscar. :pat:How?? Running around the ring, dancing, and clinching dont win you fights...Oscar threw a lot of punches and all Whittaker did was run and block the whole fight...robbery my ass!

It was a close fight. So do people tend to agree that the Whittaker, Oscar fought was still a live fighter? Oscar tends to get zero credit for winning that fight. Besides Mayweather and Pacquiao, he'd beat everyone else at 147 right now. Though that isn't saying much to be honest.

whitaker got robbed by Oscar. It was a close fight. So do people tend to agree that the Whittaker, Oscar fought was still a live fighter? Oscar tends to get zero credit for winning that fight.

Was Pernell Whittaker more shot when Oscar fought him or was Oscar more shot when Pacquiao fought him? Discuss whitaker got robbed by Oscar.

Whitaker although faded was still capable of beating top fighters. Oscar, just wasn't. That doesnt change the fact Pac's 10x greater than Oscar, though.

Even the Whitaker that fought Tito had a lot more left in him, not even close really.

Whitaker was still a capable fighter when De La Hoya beat him, and it was a close decision. Oscar was completely shot when he fought Pacquiao.