Will Hopkins take the Pacquiao route and sue Pascal for steroid use accusations?

No one should have to prove something just because someone else is claiming. Simple as that. Its obvious that Pascal was just trying to sell the fight and get in Benard's head. Even the media isn't taking the accusations seriously. Another difference is that Pascal has to fight Benard either way. He already signed a contract.

kinda funny to see nard on the receiving end of the attack...might just watch that one live....

If Hopkins doesn't sue it makes it kinda makes it look like he IS on roids. If you have nothing to hide, you don't sue right off the bat. You prove you're clean then if you still wanna sue you do that. Guys that have been accused of PED's just say bring it, i'll take any test. For example the baseball player Albert Pujols, questions and accusations of him using PED's came up, and his first response was he'll take any test any time, I have nothing to hide. Not getting a team of lawyers and opening a lawsuit, like Bonds, Mosley, Marion Jones, Palmeiro, Clemens, etc did.

Jean Pascal is doing 10x worse what GBP/Roger/Sr did by outright screaming "cheater" at Hopkins and telling him to take the test, saying he's on steroids. This is also on video. So is it like Bernard Hopkins to sue, or is he just going to shut Pascal up in the ring? And what do you think, should Hopkins sue? I honestly think he's not gonna waste his time suing, that's just not like him. If he feels the accusations are causing him monetary damage, then yes.

hop said thats not how he handles things BUT in the same interview stated that his lawyers were in the building! Who knows. These guys are pulling the same shyt ssm and marion jones did. That to me wreaks of suspicion. Elaborate....

pascal probably saw the video of bhop talking about how 2 of his lawyers were in the building and witnessed everything pascal did that's why he pulled back. i don't understand why some people are acting like it's ok to make accusations but it's not ok to sue your accuser. that's a retarded way of thinking. it will never make any sense. why would you even care about it is the great mystery if you're just a fan and have no relation to the people involved. if the situation was reversed, i can't see myself defending the false accuser. world can't be perfect, i know. haters exist everywhere and on any side. in the end, using your brain and not get influenced by anything is really all that matters.

so i can technically sue you for calling me a dumb ass right? now, how far will that lawsuit go in reality? get out of your mother's basement for a second ya f@ggot. Reading is not one of your strong points is it?

hop said thats not how he handles things BUT in the same interview stated that his lawyers were in the building! Who knows. These guys are pulling the same shyt ssm and marion jones did. That to me wreaks of suspicion.

If Hopkins doesn't sue it makes it kinda makes it look like he IS on roids. Please explain

Never in a million years could I see Hopkins suing Pascal for talking sh!t. IMO that is not in Hopkins make up or cloth that he cut from to sue Pascal from some sucka sh!t like that. I know B-Hop all about the money but I just can't see it.

Probably not But he will take Pacs route and not take the tests tho

If Hopkins doesn't sue it makes it kinda makes it look like he IS on roids.

Agreed.. but Pascal killed that noise real quick.. he denied it shortly after the press conference, when asked if he was accusing B-Hop to be on any type of PEDs. pascal probably saw the video of bhop talking about how 2 of his lawyers were in the building and witnessed everything pascal did that's why he pulled back. i don't understand why some people are acting like it's ok to make accusations but it's not ok to sue your accuser. that's a retarded way of thinking.

if after bhop whoops his ass and pascal still continues with his accusations or claim something like he lost because bhop is on peds then for sure he'll get his day in court. Agreed.. but Pascal killed that noise real quick.. he denied it shortly after the press conference, when asked if he was accusing B-Hop to be on any type of PEDs.

if after bhop whoops his ass and pascal still continues with his accusations or claim something like he lost because bhop is on peds then for sure he'll get his day in court.

lol is hopkins a brand? what sponsorship money is he losing due to the defamation? Do you have to be a brand to sue for defamation you dumbass? Defamation per se The four (4) categories of slander that are actionable per se are (i) accusing someone of a crime; (ii) alleging that someone has a foul or loathsome disease; (iii) adversely reflecting on a person’s fitness to conduct their business or trade; and (iv) imputing serious sexual misconduct. Here again, the plaintiff need only prove that someone had published the statement to any third party. No proof of special damages is required. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation#United_States

Different circumstances.. especially when you have Pascal taking back what he said the very next press conference saying that he's not accusing B-Hop to be on anything.. Mayweathers have been talking shit for years now... Also, B-Hop got Pascal to fight.. Pacquiao has yet to get Mayweather to fight.

benard isnt as sensitive as pac so i think no