Pac always says in interveiws that he wishes Floyd would get all his legal troubles sorted so that they can fight soon. Yet he is suing Floyd in his own case for Roid name calling so to speak. So how is this 'wishing him the best in his legal issues' when he is ONE of the guys giving Floyd a legal battle. If Pac really wanted to fight soon, he wouldnt be talking about Marquez in November and wouldnt be Suing Floyd just for name calling. I mean, Paulie Maliggnagi said Pac is on Roids, yet he isnt getting suid for it...
I know thread this will be swept under the rug by Pac Stans and Non Boxing fans.
Real Boxing fans know the truth.
Just sayin...
PS I know my spelling sucks..
First negotiation, second, third, seventh...when did he agree? When he signs to fight someone else.
Sure. But the first negotiation was the sole reason for the fight not happening. As opposed to the next one where Floyd was being an idiot also.
He did? In the first negotiations?
I'm quite sure that's what IMDAZED is refering to. In which the sole reason the fight didn't happen was because Pacqiuao refused he testing.
First negotiation, second, third, seventh...when did he agree? When he signs to fight someone else.
1. pac didnt deliberately cheated on scale years ago...and that fight with the thai was on the same division while floyd fought jmm a lightweight at welterweight then cheated on his weight.
2. proof?????
3.how did pac turn down the biggest fight in history when in fact he agreed to all floyds demand that floyd acknowledges in his ustream rant.
He did? In the first negotiations?
I'm quite sure that's what IMDAZED is refering to. In which the sole reason the fight didn't happen was because Pacqiuao refused he testing.
1. pac didnt deliberately cheated on scale years ago...and that fight with the thai was on the same division while floyd fought jmm a lightweight at welterweight then cheated on his weight.
2. proof?????
3.how did pac turn down the biggest fight in history when in fact he agreed to all floyds demand that floyd acknowledges in his ustream rant.
1. Deliberately? You mean he thought he would make weight? Shocking. He cheated the scales.
2. http://www.boxingscene.com/erik-morales-i-want-fight-manny-pacquiao-again--30153
Article Link - http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&opt=printable&id=30153#ixzz1HXT0u63L
This is a legal waiver. By copying and using the material from this article, you agree to give full credit to BoxingScene.com or provide a link to the original article.
“I will say Manny is a great fighter but I look back and he would give me any weight allowance in our second and third bouts when they knew I couldn’t make 130 pounds. Pacquiao demanded weight penalties of $500,000 for each pound.
3. Wow...just wow.
Pacquiao cheated on the scales years ago.
Pacquiao also first implemented weight penalties for Erik Morales.
Pacquiao also turned down the biggest fight in history over drug testing.
1. pac didnt deliberately cheated on scale years ago...and that fight with the thai was on the same division while floyd fought jmm a lightweight at welterweight then cheated on his weight.
2. proof?????
3.how did pac turn down the biggest fight in history when in fact he agreed to all floyds demand that floyd acknowledges in his ustream rant.
Pac always says in interveiws that he wishes Floyd would get all his legal troubles sorted so that they can fight soon. Yet he is suing Floyd in his own case for Roid name calling so to speak. So how is this 'wishing him the best in his legal issues' when he is ONE of the guys giving Floyd a legal battle. If Pac really wanted to fight soon, he wouldnt be talking about Marquez in November and wouldnt be Suing Floyd just for name calling. I mean, Paulie Maliggnagi said Pac is on Roids, yet he isnt getting suid for it...
I know thread this will be swept under the rug by Pac Stans and Non Boxing fans.
Real Boxing fans know the truth.
Just sayin...
PS I know my spelling sucks..
it just means pac wants floyd to straighten out his attitude. simple as that.
here you go """"1. The way others followed suit after Tyson & Holyfield used testing outside of commission rules.
2. He's broken weight rules before. The $10m penalty also is his own rule, not a commission rule."""""(post #21)
i rebutted you on your post no.2. that it was floyd who first broke the rule when he paid jmm for penalty
Pacquiao cheated on the scales years ago.
Pacquiao also first implemented weight penalties for Erik Morales.
Pacquiao also turned down the biggest fight in history over drug testing.
No, my argument is that Pac pulled out of the biggest fight over testing.
here you go """"1. The way others followed suit after Tyson & Holyfield used testing outside of commission rules.
2. He's broken weight rules before. The $10m penalty also is his own rule, not a commission rule."""""(post #21)
i rebutted you on your post no.2. that it was floyd who first broke the rule when he paid jmm for penalty
i would blame it on pacquiao. he was the one who asked for something that is "special" and cotto wants the normal weight limit.
this is knowing that both fighters will not be affected by the catchweight.
How's that? Something that can easily be obliged to being the sole reason the fight doesn't happen. And the person who rejects it isn't to blame?
That makes no sense.
Look loser, I did not ask you for proof why you pretend to dickride Pacquiao, it was you who asked me...so I obliged. OK? LOL!!!
So don't give me links nobody is asking for it.
And Yeah Manny is god, I don't front. :haha:
You obliged with nothing. A 2008 post where I argue a case for Guzman fighting Manny? As opposed to a 2009 post with me arguing Manny's case over Floyd? What a f*g you are :lol1:
LOL!!! hahahahahahaha!!
:owned:
Owned? How? Oh wait...because I don't think Manny is God. Here, how about I raise your post with another? Check the date...f*ggot. :lol1:
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6593973#post6593973
yes it is.. your argument regarding pac broke the rules when pac ask for 10 mil weight penalty...i just rebut this argument that it was floyd who first broke the rule when he paid jmm for every pound overweight..and i never mention nsac rules either and fyi, pac already stated many times in pac/margo pre fight conference that he already agreed to all floyd's demands that only floyd can find out if pac is bluffing or not by agreeing to the fight (forget the 100 million coz that is a blatant duck.)
No, my argument is that Pac pulled out of the biggest fight over testing.
That's great but that's not my argument. You guys love turning it into NSAC rules when bringing up why Pac is avoiding testing. Why is he, BTW?
yes it is.. your argument regarding pac broke the rules when pac ask for 10 mil weight penalty...i just rebut this argument that it was floyd who first broke the rule when he paid jmm for every pound overweight..and i never mention nsac rules either and fyi, pac already stated many times in pac/margo pre fight conference that he already agreed to all floyd's demands that only floyd can find out if pac is bluffing or not by agreeing to the fight (forget the 100 million coz that is a blatant duck.)
Here's proof number 1 dipsh1t. Just go through my post, the pages before where I quoted you the next few pages of other posters getting "it".
"it" = your pretentious front
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=194466&page=11
Let me look for some more.
Yeah, I read it. Where did I bash him?
This is your proof? What a f*cking d*ckrider you are.
Give me a few hours to look for your sh1tty posts. I'm busy but owning you will be my consolation price.
Sounds good. I'll give you as much time as you need. Let me know when you find these Pac bashing posts prior to his refusal to taking testing. Just make sure to come back when you find jack sh*t, f*ggot.
Oh please, you front as an unbiased poster and pretended to like Pac before the OST hoopla. When in fact you've been hating on Pac BEFORE the your daddy senior made claims.
Show proof, like you f*ggots always say. Go ahead.
the guy changes topics when he's losing an argument.
or when that fails, he pretends to be stupid and not understand what you are talking about.
OR
says that he answered your question previously (which he didn't) and questions your intellect for not getting it..