Who do ya'll think is the better boxer?
IMO I think Quartey was a much better boxer than Clottey!
Decided to make this thread to get away from all the sellouts who only want to pay attention to Pac, Mayweather, Khan all day everyday...
Discussion about them is fine but not 10 out of the 15 threads on the opening page lol....
If it werent for that cut. Cotto wouldve dominated. People give clottey too much props for not being able to beat a 1 eyed fighter.
thank you!! jesus how is that so hard to understand......
umm no it was close cuz Cotto had a gash the size of a war trench over his eye from a clottey headbutt.....
http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/88476328.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF878921CC759DF4EBAC47D056541D0252379DFDD2F0F527211FDB0A289996FCDA98F79EE30A760B0D811297
If it werent for that cut. Cotto wouldve dominated. People give clottey too much props for not being able to beat a 1 eyed fighter.
Actually. I completely agree. Clottey should have a win over Cotto. The fight was close because Joshua has been having a hard time pulling the trigger these past few years.
umm no it was close cuz Cotto had a gash the size of a war trench over his eye from a clottey headbutt.....
http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/88476328.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF878921CC759DF4EBAC47D056541D0252379DFDD2F0F527211FDB0A289996FCDA98F79EE30A760B0D811297
They lost when it mattered most. But they were also "victims" of bad judging. People argue that Quartey beat DLH, and he probably should have won against Forresst. But he was beaten by Vargas and Winky.
Clottey on the other hand, I think the only bad judging was Cotto-Clottey. I think Clottey should have a win over Cotto. But he also lost when it mattered most.
Definitely, Quartey had the better career and was the better fighter.
I was paying attention up until here...
Actually. I completely agree. Clottey should have a win over Cotto. The fight was close because Joshua has been having a hard time pulling the trigger these past few years.
Who do ya'll think is the better boxer?
IMO I think Quartey was a much better boxer than Clottey!
Decided to make this thread to get away from all the sellouts who only want to pay attention to Pac, Mayweather, Khan all day everyday...
Discussion about them is fine but not 10 out of the 15 threads on the opening page lol....
Quartey by a long country mile.......... It aint even close.
They lost when it mattered most. But they were also "victims" of bad judging. People argue that Quartey beat DLH, and he probably should have won against Forresst. But he was beaten by Vargas and Winky.
Clottey on the other hand, I think the only bad judging was Cotto-Clottey. I think Clottey should have a win over Cotto. But he also lost when it mattered most.
Definitely, Quartey had the better career and was the better fighter.
I was paying attention up until here...
They lost when it mattered most. But they were also "victims" of bad judging. People argue that Quartey beat DLH, and he probably should have won against Forresst. But he was beaten by Vargas and Winky.
Clottey on the other hand, I think the only bad judging was Cotto-Clottey. I think Clottey should have a win over Cotto. But he also lost when it mattered most.
Definitely, Quartey had the better career and was the better fighter.
Quartey was an awesome fighter.
I think he would definitely be a top WW if he was around today.
Quartey seemed to actually have passion for the sport, unlike Clottey.
Ike got the power advantage to go with that sick jab that would keep Clottey at bay all night.
Ike had a better career and would win a one-sided UD if they fought.