Haye's Own Fans Were Trashing Him So Badly His Facebook Page Magically Disappearred

Haye and Booth... :luvbed: :blowjob: :gay: Why are you constantly thinking about dicks?

That's funny coming from a poster who is addicted to fags. LOL well done 4 another stupid post cos if ur refering to Haye that is one person which would be *** not fags you dumb clown.

I don't really care what Haye thinks about his fans to be honest, I feel sorry for you Tunney. Anyone who disagrees with you must "love" Haye yet you talk about him more than anybody else on this forum. He is on your mind far too much for your own good maybe you could try not talk about Haye for a day at least and take it step by step like trying to give up cigarettes. That's funny coming from a poster who is addicted to fags.

We pity such a gullible fanboy as yourself. You love him unconditionally, believing every lie he tells. Don't you realize Haye laughs about his foolish supporters like you? I don't really care what Haye thinks about his fans to be honest, I feel sorry for you Tunney. Anyone who disagrees with you must "love" Haye yet you talk about him more than anybody else on this forum. He is on your mind far too much for your own good maybe you could try not talk about Haye for a day at least and take it step by step like trying to give up cigarettes.

No reason to take down a social networking site that gives you free publicity unless you are a b*tch who can't take well deserved criticism. I don't think you understand the difference between constructive criticism and cyber stalking with abusive messages.

He is black and British so that is two reasons for some to hate on him. I personally hate Haye because I'm a male chauvinist pig.

A lot of deluded gaylords in this thread. In britain Haye is agurably the most popular fighter at the Moment his PPV sale outdo Khans and Froch's he is loved on tv regularly and has his own magazine a few fans from a boxing forum flooding his FB page don't reflect on a nation why delude yourselves? No reason to take down a social networking site that gives you free publicity unless you are a b*tch who can't take well deserved criticism.

I'm not changing anything go read my original statement. It's not as if the fight will only be watched in England. Which fight!!! Khan is more of a cash cow in the long-run for sky period. You say his ethnicity counts against him, i was putting your right. It makes him more well known if anything, believe me. All my friends are white and with the exception of maybe 1 he is very popular with all of them. He is very popular with ladies, he is very popular with sponsors, and the general public. That doesn't mean David Haye is not popular he is just not on khan's level, nor is any other fighter in the UK apart from arguably ricky hatton

You're saying Haye will be stripped if he waits and fights Wlad in July. Yet Haye is lining up a fight with Mormeck who is most certainly not his mandatory in the meantime. If Haye were to be stripped for waiting to fight Klitschko in July then he would also be stripped for taking a Mormeck fight. There is no difference, in either scenario he is not taking on a mandatory challenger. His mandatory is Chagaev who isn't medically cleared to fight...Your basing your assumptions on rumours, the Mormeck fight hasn't even been signed or come off yet. He is ranked in the wba last I checked I think he is around 5. Like I have said I don't know the ins and outs, but im pretty sure he would have to defend the wba title against someone ranked to keep his belt. If its not Chagaev then no2 is povetkin I think, if he doesn't want it then the next guy, if anyone gets jumped they have a right to make their case and it can go to purse bids, that is the normal way. Nothing has happened but you are already making assumptions.

Well I would say the British public is probably what you want to consider if your sky!!!!?? WTF is wrong with you...the whole debate is why sky would pick khan over haye, thats what I broke down for you, don't move the goal posts now. He's back pedalling...don't get stuck on the ropes I'm not changing anything go read my original statement. It's not as if the fight will only be watched in England.

Well I would say the British public is probably what you want to consider if your sky!!!!?? WTF is wrong with you...the whole debate is why sky would pick khan over haye, thats what I broke down for you, don't move the goal posts now. He's back pedalling...don't get stuck on the ropes So Sky prefers Khan-McCloskey over Haye-Klitschko because it will satisfy all the camel humper loving Green Teefs? Sky is just protecting Haye from Klitschko so they can milk the ignorant British boxing fans with a couple more mismatches.

Yes he has accomplished more than audley did not disputing the fact, but not in 2010 he didn't. Like you said 4 years ago, and even then to call him a world champ at that stage would be debatable. He won a vacant belt against a nobody and then lost it to Ibragimov. That is what he is doing now? Taking a fight in May to defend. Then looking at it later in the year, and don't make things up and presume he can side step with the wba, you don' know...don't make assumptions What club you support

Yes he has accomplished more than audley did not disputing the fact, but not in 2010 he didn't. Like you said 4 years ago, and even then to call him a world champ at that stage would be debatable. He won a vacant belt against a nobody and then lost it to Ibragimov. That is what he is doing now? Taking a fight in May to defend. Then looking at it later in the year, and don't make things up and presume he can side step with the wba, you don' know...don't make assumptions You're saying Haye will be stripped if he waits and fights Wlad in July. Yet Haye is lining up a fight with Mormeck who is most certainly not his mandatory in the meantime. If Haye were to be stripped for waiting to fight Klitschko in July then he would also be stripped for taking a Mormeck fight. There is no difference, in either scenario he is not taking on a mandatory challenger.

I wasn't talking about the British public when I said there are people that don't like him. Well I would say the British public is probably what you want to consider if your sky!!!!?? WTF is wrong with you...the whole debate is why sky would pick khan over haye, thats what I broke down for you, don't move the goal posts now. He's back pedalling...don't get stuck on the ropes

Right, I'm stupid. I'm sure mensa is all over you. Briggs was a champ just over 4 years ago; he has accomplished more than Audley ever will. I don't look at the whole picture you say? Why don't you point out why Vit even fought Briggs in the first place? It's because there was no one else available including Haye because he was MIA at that time. How can you claim Audley is a legit contender when even Haye swore he would never fight him because he's a joke. If Haye had half the balls and a quarter the brain you seem to think he has, then he would have taken a tuneup in England in and then fought in July or later in the summer and that way he could have fought Wlad without having to deal with Sauerland. Jesus, you Haye fans have more excuses than a pregnant nun. Yes he has accomplished more than audley did not disputing the fact, but not in 2010 he didn't. Like you said 4 years ago, and even then to call him a world champ at that stage would be debatable. He won a vacant belt against a nobody and then lost it to Ibragimov. That is what he is doing now? Taking a fight in May to defend. Then looking at it later in the year, and don't make things up and presume he can side step with the wba, you don' know...don't make assumptions

Popularity is different to being Identifiable. "A lot of people" I doubt that very much, I would say in the grand scheme of things it is probably a minority that dislike him because of his ethnicity, but im sure the fact that he was a millionaire when he was a teenager and had a relatively easy ride in the early stages of his pro career had as much to do with it. He is the most identifiable boxer in this country bar none. Ricky hatton is extremely popular, joe calzaghe is popular, david haye is popular but they are all eclipsed by Amir. Everyone knows who he is in the UK old ladies, you name it. I can pretty much guarantee if I walked out in my road right now 99.99% of my neighbours would know who he is. An Olympic medallist is a rare commodity in the UK, especially in boxing and being a British-pakistani is even more rare in fact I think he is the only one ever who has won a medal for team GB. Add to that the fact that he won it at 17 the youngest medallist since Floyd Patterson. Then I would say that his ethnicity, his name make him more identifiable. Put it this way James Degale won the gold and all though we did much better in China as a whole in boxing, winning a gold is a huge deal yet he is nowhere near as popular as Amir. Anyway im done with this convo because I don't seem to getting through to you and like I said you think you are in the know...but don't seem to know jack about any of this. I wasn't talking about the British public when I said there are people that don't like him.

For one he loses his belt, and while that may mean nothing to you or me, it means it is not a unification fight any more and certainly takes some gloss of the fight especially with the casual fan, and I would not be at all surprised if the Klitchko's use the fact even more to their advantage in negotiations. Why should he vacate if he doesn't even know if the fight is happening for sure or not. The other option is he takes the fight in May which is what he is doing, which means he would immediately have to go into training camp once his next fight is finished to do July 2nd. Seeing as there is no guarantees the smart move is to defend his heavyweight title not: lose his belt, stay inactive whilst wladimir fights, hoping he doesn't get injured, and that wlad decides to fight him. If wlad doesn't fight him then he has to fight a non-title heavyweight fight, which could potentially be his last. Like I said your either not particularly smart, or you refuse to look at the whole scenario from a neutral point of view, im suspecting its the latter, but your coming across as stupid. This is emphasised by your naive comments about Audley being older than briggs, a fighter who was in his prime in the mid 90's who has been in numerous wars and comparing him to a (yes older) fresher active heavyweight who only turned pro in his 30's, having worked his way up to european champion (yes legit contender). That is a pretty stupid comparison, in boxing terms Shannon Briggs is completely old and shot. No Karma left. Great post

I brought up his background because I'm sure you know as well as I do that a lot of people dislike him for that reason alone. I'm not sure I understand your point of it making him more identifiable. To who exactly would he be more identifiable other than Muslims? Popularity is different to being Identifiable. "A lot of people" I doubt that very much, I would say in the grand scheme of things it is probably a minority that dislike him because of his ethnicity, but im sure the fact that he was a millionaire when he was a teenager and had a relatively easy ride in the early stages of his pro career had as much to do with it. He is the most identifiable boxer in this country bar none. Ricky hatton is extremely popular, joe calzaghe is popular, david haye is popular but they are all eclipsed by Amir. Everyone knows who he is in the UK old ladies, you name it. I can pretty much guarantee if I walked out in my road right now 99.99% of my neighbours would know who he is. An Olympic medallist is a rare commodity in the UK, especially in boxing and being a British-pakistani is even more rare in fact I think he is the only one ever who has won a medal for team GB. Add to that the fact that he won it at 17 the youngest medallist since Floyd Patterson. Then I would say that his ethnicity, his name make him more identifiable. Put it this way James Degale won the gold and all though we did much better in China as a whole in boxing, winning a gold is a huge deal yet he is nowhere near as popular as Amir. Anyway im done with this convo because I don't seem to getting through to you and like I said you think you are in the know...but don't seem to know jack about any of this.

Also, even if he didn't want a tuneup before Wlad, you know very well that fighters always find ways around their mandatory while still keeping their belt, especially if it's for a unification fight.

For one he loses his belt, and while that may mean nothing to you or me, it means it is not a unification fight any more and certainly takes some gloss of the fight especially with the casual fan, and I would not be at all surprised if the Klitchko's use the fact even more to their advantage in negotiations. Why should he vacate if he doesn't even know if the fight is happening for sure or not. The other option is he takes the fight in May which is what he is doing, which means he would immediately have to go into training camp once his next fight is finished to do July 2nd. Seeing as there is no guarantees the smart move is to defend his heavyweight title not: lose his belt, stay inactive whilst wladimir fights, hoping he doesn't get injured, and that wlad decides to fight him. If wlad doesn't fight him then he has to fight a non-title heavyweight fight, which could potentially be his last. Like I said your either not particularly smart, or you refuse to look at the whole scenario from a neutral point of view, im suspecting its the latter, but your coming across as stupid. This is emphasised by your naive comments about Audley being older than briggs, a fighter who was in his prime in the mid 90's who has been in numerous wars and comparing him to a (yes older) fresher active heavyweight who only turned pro in his 30's, having worked his way up to european champion (yes legit contender). That is a pretty stupid comparison, in boxing terms Shannon Briggs is completely old and shot. Right, I'm stupid. I'm sure mensa is all over you. Briggs was a champ just over 4 years ago; he has accomplished more than Audley ever will. I don't look at the whole picture you say? Why don't you point out why Vit even fought Briggs in the first place? It's because there was no one else available including Haye because he was MIA at that time. How can you claim Audley is a legit contender when even Haye swore he would never fight him because he's a joke. If Haye had half the balls and a quarter the brain you seem to think he has, then he would have taken a tuneup in England in and then fought in July or later in the summer and that way he could have fought Wlad without having to deal with Sauerland. Jesus, you Haye fans have more excuses than a pregnant nun.