Timothy Bradley describes his own fighting style as Aggressive, Reckless, not caring, and street style way of fighting. He attributes those characteristics as the reason he is where he is at today. Undefeated, 2 time Junior welterweight champion, and #1 in the division. The consequences of his style has resulted in a total of 18 head butts occurring on 6 opponents, in 6 consecutive fights.
So with that said, Did The end justify the means?
Sophocles wrote "The end excuses any evil." In other words, the end justifies the means
Does Bradley continued success of winning justify 18 head butts occurring on his past 6 opponents, in 6 consecutive fights. Even if some of them were called accidental.
http://www.gifsoup.com/imager.php?id=1863651 GIFSoup
Minimizing and justifying what the hell Bradley is doing is absurd, and WRONG!
To try and deny the FACTS of Bradley's past 6 fights, or to try minimizing and justifying what the hell Bradley is doing with his head is reckless, shameless, and ignorant. Some might say it is Bradley’s opponents fault for not keeping a good, constant, and solid jab in Bradley’s face for 12 rounds.
My response to that is if they cannot for 12 rounds keep a good, constant, and solid jab in Bradley's face it is their fault if Bradley head butt’s them?
The answer is no it is not their fault. The duty of stopping an illegal action is NOT the victim’s responsibility. if we go by this theory or logic, if women cannot kick, scream, scratch, and bite her attacker for the entirety of the assault it is her fault if she gets raped.
I know this comparison is harsh. However I applied this logic and theory to another situation to show the consequences of thinking the way some might think. The consequence of logic like this is dangerous. Because it puts the duty on the victim to take responsibility for the attackers actions. This is wrong in all aspects of life, including boxing
The point is the responsibility is not on Bradley’s opponents to stop him from doing something illegal. Bradley’s opponents should not be blame for being on the receiving end of an illegal action, or dangerous and reckless behavior.
http://www.gifsoup.com/imager.php?id=1863651 GIFSoup
What we can all determine by these facts are that no matter how big or how small of a part it played. Bradley's headbutts played a "CONSTANT" role in his past 6 victories.
So what we need to do is STOP BLAMING BRADLEY’S VICTIMS, and Start BLAMING BRADLEY.
How more opponents have to get headbutted before we say ENOUGH!
Horus Twitter::http://twitter.com/#!/Horusp4p
Horus Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/p...00000555462366
Horus Email:Horusp4p@aol.com
http://www.gifsoup.com/imager.php?id=1863609 GIFSoup
oh gosh, then I wont get to hear all the amazing factual nonbiased things you have to say!
Just blow my brains out, anything but put me on ignore!
:lol1: :lol1:
Timothy Bradley describes his own fighting style as Aggressive, Reckless, not caring, and street style way of fighting. He attributes those characteristics as the reason he is where he is at today. Undefeated, 2 time Junior welterweight champion, and #1 in the division. The consequences of his style has resulted in a total of 18 head butts occurring on 6 opponents, in 6 consecutive fights.
So with that said, Did The end justify the means?
Sophocles wrote "The end excuses any evil." In other words, the end justifies the means
Does Bradley continued success of winning justify 18 head butts occurring on his past 6 opponents, in 6 consecutive fights. Even if some of them were called accidental.
http://www.gifsoup.com/imager.php?id=1863651 GIFSoup
Minimizing and justifying what the hell Bradley is doing is absurd, and WRONG!
To try and deny the FACTS of Bradley's past 6 fights, or to try minimizing and justifying what the hell Bradley is doing with his head is reckless, shameless, and ignorant. Some might say it is Bradley’s opponents fault for not keeping a good, constant, and solid jab in Bradley’s face for 12 rounds.
My response to that is if they cannot for 12 rounds keep a good, constant, and solid jab in Bradley's face it is their fault if Bradley head butt’s them?
The answer is no it is not their fault. The duty of stopping an illegal action is NOT the victim’s responsibility. if we go by this theory or logic, if women cannot kick, scream, scratch, and bite her attacker for the entirety of the assault it is her fault if she gets raped.
I know this comparison is harsh. However I applied this logic and theory to another situation to show the consequences of thinking the way some might think. The consequence of logic like this is dangerous. Because it puts the duty on the victim to take responsibility for the attackers actions. This is wrong in all aspects of life, including boxing
The point is the responsibility is not on Bradley’s opponents to stop him from doing something illegal. Bradley’s opponents should not be blame for being on the receiving end of an illegal action, or dangerous and reckless behavior.
http://www.gifsoup.com/imager.php?id=1863651 GIFSoup
What we can all determine by these facts are that no matter how big or how small of a part it played. Bradley's headbutts played a "CONSTANT" role in his past 6 victories.
So what we need to do is STOP BLAMING BRADLEY’S VICTIMS, and Start BLAMING BRADLEY.
How more opponents have to get headbutted before we say ENOUGH!
Horus Twitter::http://twitter.com/#!/Horusp4p
Horus Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/p...00000555462366
Horus Email:Horusp4p@aol.com
http://www.gifsoup.com/imager.php?id=1863609 GIFSoup
What do you think about Andre Ward?
oh gosh, then I wont get to hear all the amazing factual nonbiased things you have to say!
Just blow my brains out, anything but put me on ignore!
just trying to be fair and give people like you a warning.
so you will no reason to ***** and complain when it happens
i wish Bradley would headbutt Horus' computer
Thanks for addressing the topic.
If bradley headbutted my computer, His insurance would cover it because bradley has a high rate of accidents. lol