There's what 17 weight divisions and the top fighter in each can't crack top 10
Yes 140 is one of the best weight divisions but neither fighter has really fought
The big dogs yet
Bradley deserves it for sure, not devon
After he beats Bradley, what will be your opinion?
personal oppinions aside..fact is alexander is undefeated
Larry how the fuk you gonna make a thread about people's personal opinions and then say "personal opinions aside"? lol
Should the #1 fighter in 1 of boxing's most stacked division crack the top 10 pfp??Seriously??People pay far too much attention to pfp as it is,but if the top fighter in 1 of boxing's toughest weightclasses can't crack the top 10 pfp,then they might as well do away with it altogether.
There's what 17 weight divisions and the top fighter in each can't crack top 10
Yes 140 is one of the best weight divisions but neither fighter has really fought
The big dogs yet
Bradley deserves it for sure, not devon
It depends on how the fight goes and how the winner wins.
If its a 12 round shitfest, then neither deserve to be on the list. If one guy clearly destroys the other, then an argument can be made for a late spot on the list.
I agree. both have got to give great performances when they fight despite the lack of attendance.
if both give at FOTY type fight/performance, then both will get on the top 10 p4p list. however if both stink out the joint, both should not be in the top 10
IMO...
No one that is only a 1 division champion should be on the p4p list period...
Its easy to stay in your weight class and beat everybody there, say you're the best and wait till someone better comes along?
Divisional championships are what define boxers, their will and desire to be the best.....
Your post is made of a lot of fail. When a fighter grows out of his original weight class it is not a credit to him when he decides to move up a weight class.
The only thing that should matter is the quality of your opposition.
IMO...
No one that is only a 1 division champion should be on the p4p list period...
Its easy to stay in your weight class and beat everybody there, say you're the best and wait till someone better comes along?
Divisional championships are what define boxers, their will and desire to be the best.....
bullsh1t its harder to remain dedicated and keep making weight and beat everyone who enters your division than to jump weight and fight the weakest champion in each division
Who knows how Ring Magazine would position the winner, but if it was me to decide I'd put Bradley at #8 (can't put him over Montiel). If Alexander wins, I'd put him in Bradley's #9 position.
IMO...
No one that is only a 1 division champion should be on the p4p list period...
Its easy to stay in your weight class and beat everybody there, say you're the best and wait till someone better comes along?
Divisional championships are what define boxers, their will and desire to be the best.....
Actually that is not so easy at all.
IMO...
No one that is only a 1 division champion should be on the p4p list period...
Its easy to stay in your weight class and beat everybody there, say you're the best and wait till someone better comes along?
Divisional championships are what define boxers, their will and desire to be the best.....
On second thought, I don't think devon cracks the list with a win over Bradley
His win over Tim will be like pascals win over Dawson and he didn't crack the top 10
Agree with this.
On second thought, I don't think devon cracks the list with a win over Bradley
His win over Tim will be like pascals win over Dawson and he didn't crack the top 10
Should the #1 fighter in 1 of boxing's most stacked division crack the top 10 pfp??Seriously??People pay far too much attention to pfp as it is,but if the top fighter in 1 of boxing's toughest weightclasses can't crack the top 10 pfp,then they might as well do away with it altogether.