I, Danny Gunz will be accepting an online debate via the chat about the legitimacy of Shane Mosley as Manny Pacquiao's next opponent.
Since this is an open forum I will pick through a poll decided, after the challengers private message for debate, through NSB.
The topic will be "Is Shane Mosley a legitimate opponent for Manny Pacquiao."
The full topic of debate will be "Resolved: Manny Pacquiao the undisputed welterweight champion of the world and recognized pound-for-pound champion is picking legitimate opponents for his respective championship." My opponent for the debate will be arguing for the affirmative (Manny Pacquiao is picking legitimate opponents for his championship) and I will be arguing for the negative (There is no good data suggesting Manny Pacquiao is picking legitimate opposition for his championship).
All specific details (minutes on rounds, and types on rounds etc.) will be determined after an opponent is selected and agreed upon by both parties. A moderator can be determined before hand and a question and answer period if decided.
If any questions just pm me faggots
hey danny I provided a poll for you and some peeps here seems to agree with you that pac is an undisputed WW champ. There
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=453237
i believe this is a money stay busy fight for pac,not a career fight.
it will be harder than people think,but pac will make it look easy,whilst working hard to make it look so.
shane should ideally have been made to prove hes not past it and come off a win before getting the fight.
but berto is a chump whos not proven himself vs anyone good,so he could have just been knocked out in the first round and been exposed.
marquez and the weight issue isnt too bad,both would come in at 145.with marquez staying 1457,pac 147 on the night of the fight.
but if marquez didnt do what he could to get the fight,even should have left gbp if he really wanted the fight!.
dont think any light welters are seasoned or big enough name wise to threaten pac,so no big takers there.
alverez might be one opponent if he faces someone really decent,same for berto if he sorts his act out.
really,just be thankfull pac is staying busy,taking regular exciting fights agiasnt powerful punchers with strong chins,and blame mayweather/marquez for pac having to hang around and fight clottey margarito and mosley.
I don't like this fight, I think Pac will run away with a UD or even KO Shane. I do understand why they chose him & I can't hate. Just like Floyd did when he picked Shane, they're picking the least risky opponent with a big enough name in order to generate the most money.
I, Danny Gunz will be accepting an online debate via the chat about the legitimacy of Shane Mosley as Manny Pacquiao's next opponent.
Since this is an open forum I will pick through a poll decided, after the challengers private message for debate, through NSB.
The topic will be "Is Shane Mosley a legitimate opponent for Manny Pacquiao."
The full topic of debate will be "Resolved: Manny Pacquiao the undisputed welterweight champion of the world and recognized pound-for-pound champion is picking legitimate opponents for his respective championship." My opponent for the debate will be arguing for the affirmative (Manny Pacquiao is picking legitimate opponents for his championship) and I will be arguing for the negative (There is no good data suggesting Manny Pacquiao is picking legitimate opposition for his championship).
All specific details (minutes on rounds, and types on rounds etc.) will be determined after an opponent is selected and agreed upon by both parties. A moderator can be determined before hand and a question and answer period if decided.
If any questions just pm me faggots
Why, what's wrong with Mosley? Did he get physically damaged from his fights against Margarito, Mayweather, Mora?
Against Mora, I thought Mosley won the fight, he can't do much when someone runs and don't want to fight. Mora should be banned from fighting again. There should be point deductions for running in boxing, let's say more than 4 backsteps in a row and you get a point deducted. This way so called boxers are forced to use actual boxing skills.
Against Mayweather, Mosley landed the most significant punches in round 2 of that fight, almost knocking Mayweather out. Is there anyone out there who actually, realistically thought Mayweather was going to lose to Mosley? Mosley did better than Marquez, who didn't win a single round. Me thinks if there was a Mosley Marquez fight, Marquez loses. Me thinks if there was a Mosley Berto fight, Berto loses.
And we all know what happened against Margarito.
So what was your point again?
Danny calls it undisputed. Kadyo says its not. Seems clear who is the pactard here!
Mosley is not the fight that Pacquiao fans want. Not even close!Danny acts like a pactard, what with calling him an undisputed WW champion. Pac won the WBO version of the welterweight belts and he's suddenly undisputed. That's very funny and I'm thanking him for the good laughs hahahahaha
LMAO!!!
Your proposal is defective in the first place, just admit it. Pac ain't no undisputed WW champ fool.
Danny calls it undisputed. Kadyo says its not. Seems clear who is the pactard here!
Mosley is not the fight that Pacquiao fans want. Not even close!
Who else would be the welterweight champ? Mayweather who clearly wont fight until at least the end of this year?
Fuck off PussyLMAO!!!
Your proposal is defective in the first place, just admit it. Pac ain't no undisputed WW champ fool.
I, Danny Gunz will be accepting an online debate via the chat about the legitimacy of Shane Mosley as Manny Pacquiao's next opponent.
Since this is an open forum I will pick through a poll decided, after the challengers private message for debate, through NSB.
The topic will be "Is Shane Mosley a legitimate opponent for Manny Pacquiao."
The full topic of debate will be "Resolved: Manny Pacquiao the undisputed welterweight champion of the world and recognized pound-for-pound champion is picking legitimate opponents for his respective championship." My opponent for the debate will be arguing for the affirmative (Manny Pacquiao is picking legitimate opponents for his championship) and I will be arguing for the negative (There is no good data suggesting Manny Pacquiao is picking legitimate opposition for his championship).
All specific details (minutes on rounds, and types on rounds etc.) will be determined after an opponent is selected and agreed upon by both parties. A moderator can be determined before hand and a question and answer period if decided.
If any questions just pm me faggots
What exactly do you want us to debate?
I mean I don't think it's a great matchup and neither do a lot Pacquiao fans on this site.
Manny Pacquiao is the undisputed welterweight champion of the world???? WTF!!!
and you expect people to take you seriously, eh danny? :lol1:
Who else would be the welterweight champ? Mayweather who clearly wont fight until at least the end of this year?
Fuck off Pussy
Dude even the most hardcore Pac fans dont like this fight
This kind of debate will only end up in another Pactard-Flomo war
no body wants pac/mosley. debating the wlad?haye situation would be better
you'll win this debate since most of them on this site lack critical thinking skills and reading comprehension.
they'd rather not talk about the issue and focus it on floyd or you or their circle jerking and how pacquiao will pay off their credit card debt
I, Danny Gunz will be accepting an online debate via the chat about the legitimacy of Shane Mosley as Manny Pacquiao's next opponent.
Since this is an open forum I will pick through a poll decided, after the challengers private message for debate, through NSB.
The topic will be "Is Shane Mosley a legitimate opponent for Manny Pacquiao."
The full topic of debate will be "Resolved: Manny Pacquiao the undisputed welterweight champion of the world and recognized pound-for-pound champion is picking legitimate opponents for his respective championship." My opponent for the debate will be arguing for the affirmative (Manny Pacquiao is picking legitimate opponents for his championship) and I will be arguing for the negative (There is no good data suggesting Manny Pacquiao is picking legitimate opposition for his championship).
All specific details (minutes on rounds, and types on rounds etc.) will be determined after an opponent is selected and agreed upon by both parties. A moderator can be determined before hand and a question and answer period if decided.
If any questions just pm me faggots
At this point, at 147, there is nobody active who really stands out as the definite guy. So from that standpoint, Mosley is just as good as the next guy.
Berto can be another option but the only time his name is brought up is to bring down the Mosley option. Other than that, Berto has been thrown under the bus plenty of times in the last year.
Since you brought this up, who is the clear option for you? See, it's not that clear, hey?
Nobody is thrilled about Mosley but one that everyone wanted is not available.