Miguel Cotto would still be undefeated if...

-Kirby-;9867184']He'd still be undefeated if he learned how to clinch and fight backwards. Instead he likes to be the bully in the fight, and the bigger/faster men always got the best of him. Judah and Mosley were faster than him! Miguel is a verry good boxer with underrated skills too and im happy he doesnt clinch. But a Pacquiao is just better than him. And Margacheato doesnt count! But i think Cotto should have stayed at 147.

Ok lets be real about this, with no hate or dumb crap and answer your points. 1.Any work to the defense will make you a better fighter so ...good point. . 2.Better training is debatable but if it truly is better then no argument and good point. 3.Checked Margaritos hand wraps is possible. Lets be real. If his people checked the wraps before the fight most likely the same thing that happened in the Mosley fight would have happened here. In the sense that the fight would have went on. Who wins? no one knows. But Cheato would have been suspended. If the wraps with plaster were found after the fight, Cheato would have been suspended forever and maybe in jail and the fight loss would have been erased from Cottos record. 4.If Cotto would have proposed OST testing Pac would have never fought him and Pac would look even worse than he looks now. Pac would have had two high profile fighter unwilling to fight him and there would be more pressure and scrutiny on Pac. But the simple fact is Cotto would either be unbeaten or have 1 loss to Tony. Agree with everything you say, great post!

doesn´t matter...cotto goes against anyone at anytime. thats all he does and knows. my respects....:boxing:

You make some good points, but who cares about being undefeated? Boxers lose when they face the best and challenge the best, it's a part of the game. Smart post. You get it.

1) Work on his defense as a youngster 2) had a better trainer from the beginning most important... 3) Checked his opponents hand wraps throughly 4) Proposed Random blood testing YOur thoughts?? i agree 100% good job

If he would have clinched against Margarito...he would have won that.

Miguel would still be undefeated if he stopped fighting after he beat the mighty Alfonso Gomez.

"Miguel Cotto would still be undefeated if..." - If he didn't abandon his jab against pac ROFL

know your facts stright before you talk dumbass...pac alway had a problem with bloodtest so close to the fight, floyd knew this , thus hs reason he demaded it....you think ,fear of bloodtest is BS, then you must not know who sonny liston was..and to be honest i dont expect you to!.. Spare us all your Pac obsession and your conspiracy theory..their both crap. You love this fighter too much that it blinds you I on the other hand see things for what the are.

saying some1 implied something is an opinion, what i said was facts. he lost 2 a guy who got caught cheating in his next fight and 2 a guy who refused random drug test. since you denyin it now, , heres a fact:....margo and pac spanked that ass fair and square...

Entertaining thread!!

Cotto would be a better fighter if he had a good trainer with experience since he was young. He lacks the boxing fundamentals you need to be a great fighter. He never worked on his footwork, defense, movement, etc. He fights the same way pretty much against all his opponents and doesn't give them a different look.

You make some good points, but who cares about being undefeated? Boxers lose when they face the best and challenge the best, it's a part of the game.

OMG...Forgetting the whole PAc and Floyd crap..its hard to believe that some people still defend this point of Pacs. Damn enough of the obsession with any man. Floyd is ego tripping and is not innocent but neither is Pacs dumbass. Stop telling us pactard excuses already. If everyone in the Olympis can take this test from all countries then so can your "god". He is just a man to the rest of the world. know your facts stright before you talk dumbass...pac alway had a problem with bloodtest so close to the fight, floyd knew this , thus hs reason he demaded it....you think ,fear of bloodtest is BS, then you must not know who sonny liston was..and to be honest i dont expect you to!..

Miguel Cotto would still be undefeated if he... took a vacation

pac does'nt feel 100 % after a bloodtest.....why would he want to feel like sh1t so close to the fight?.... when you said he needs to take the bloodtest to prove he's clean, do you mean(base on what youre sayin) that floyd and shane are the only ones clean then, right?.... OMG...Forgetting the whole PAc and Floyd crap..its hard to believe that some people still defend this point of Pacs. Damn enough of the obsession with any man. Floyd is ego tripping and is not innocent but neither is Pacs dumbass. Stop telling us pactard excuses already. If everyone in the Olympis can take this test from all countries then so can your "god". He is just a man to the rest of the world.

i never said he needs 2 take the test. i said cotto said he should 2 proove every1 he is clean. get it right brother. LOL.....ok, sure he said it but he never implied that he got beat by pac becuase of it like you did!....lol

pac has fronted on random test this whole time. 1st he wanted nothing 2 do with it when floyd asked for it, then the 2nd time they tried 2 get the fight done, they said he agreed 2 have it up until 7 days of the fight. pac does'nt feel 100 % after a bloodtest.....why would he want to feel like sh1t so close to the fight?.... when you said he needs to take the bloodtest to prove he's clean, do you mean(base on what youre sayin) that floyd and shane are the only ones clean then, right?....

Should I even entertain a "comeback" like this? Should I stoop to your level and respond "You too"... :rofl: i did'nt want you to respond mofo, i was simply letting you know you were describing yourself whe you said you have nothing intelligent to say to one of the posters...lol....now you know!

like you have....lol Should I even entertain a "comeback" like this? Should I stoop to your level and respond "You too"... :rofl: