Lmao im so happy b-hop was robbed

In this case, I feel he was justified. No,being robbed and to be dead are too different levels. He wasn't justified,especially just being a simple Hop nutthugger. Deserves a ban.

It was a close fight but hopkins deserved the nod no doubt-too be fair hopkins and his nuthuggers are always crying about him being robbed,so its like a broken record on here right now

I'm happy your grandmother died It was pretty ugly dude. We are on a sport website.

I don't like Hopkins as much as the next person. But, you are not a fan of the sport if you take joy in flat out robberies. In fact, you are a disgrace. Gtfo. NO!!! Bernard is cherry picking, he said Dawson is too young and a no name, then even younger Quebec club fighter Pascall and his tailor made style upset Dawson, and Bucknard fights him. Really funnny huh?? I excuse Nard to fight Pascal because he's old but not for being an hypocrit and a racist tool. I laughed when I heard the decision.

I'm happy your grandmother died

When you are accused of cherry picking Jean Pascal, who beat the former best Light Heavyweight in the world Chad Dawson, you are held to extremely high standards. Why didnt hopkins fight dawson then?

When you are accused of cherry picking Jean Pascal, who beat the former best Light Heavyweight in the world Chad Dawson, you are held to extremely high standards.

I think at Hopkin's age nobody realistically expected him to dominate a division again. At his age, and all he's done in the sport, he's earned the right to cherry pick his opponent.

Way to change your tune from Hopkins was robbed but you're happy about it to Pascal was the champ so he deserved the few close rounds. GTF outta here you ****ing monkey. ouch lol get off bhops dick for once in your life...that is all

jheez the stuff bernard can get away with-so basically the general consensus across this forum is he's excused for ducking dawson when he was at the top because he's hopkins? I thought he won however a draw wasn't surprising...pascal was the champ and hence deserved the nod in a few close rounds Way to change your tune from Hopkins was robbed but you're happy about it to Pascal was the champ so he deserved the few close rounds. GTF outta here you ****ing monkey.

jheez the stuff bernard can get away with-so basically the general consensus across this forum is he's excused for ducking dawson when he was at the top because he's hopkins? I thought he won however a draw wasn't surprising...pascal was the champ and hence deserved the nod in a few close rounds

Serious what is wrong with you? You actually want the winner of the fight to not be rewarded. Give the man some credit hes 45 years and put on an asswhooping to a hometown favourite.

First of all i thought he won the fight, but think about it from this point of view. He ducks dawson and when pascal beats him he views it as an opportunity to enhance his legacy by beating a 'weaker' titleholder. IMO Pascal should ask hop and dawson to fight each other with the winner getting a rematch-watch bernard retire again I don't like Hopkins as much as the next person. But, you are not a fan of the sport if you take joy in flat out robberies. In fact, you are a disgrace. Gtfo.