i dont, someone should explain straddling
An example would be:
Betting on Khan to UD Maidana
and
Maidana to KO Khan.
The odds for those outcomes were: 9/4 and 11/4 respectively. So whichever one happens you make money. You're betting on Khan to win a decision straddled with Maidana to win by KO. I made money off of this play because I didn't believe Khan would be able to stop Maidana... Luckily el chino made it out of the first round...
this guy is a prime example of fluff and no show.
he picked Maidana to KO Khan and Ortiz to steamroll Peterson.
He lost huge over the weekend. Both wrong picks.
Honestly ur better off just throwing **** at the wall.
and this numbnuts is a good example of a moron who doesnt even know what Dwyer is all but
this guy is a prime example of fluff and no show.
he picked Maidana to KO Khan and Ortiz to steamroll Peterson.
He lost huge over the weekend. Both wrong picks.
Honestly ur better off just throwing **** at the wall.
and im guessing you've never got one of your predictions wrong?
this guy knows his boxing .... great video
I don't even think he picks 60% at this point.
anyone betting on both sides of the fence will have the same level of success. i mean anyone. mouth breathing tards like urself too. believe it or not.
You clearly don't understand how straddling works.
this guy is a prime example of fluff and no show.
he picked Maidana to KO Khan and Ortiz to steamroll Peterson.
He lost huge over the weekend. Both wrong picks.
Honestly ur better off just throwing **** at the wall.
if you get 60-65% of your bets correct, you are doing GREAT.
and if you truly listen to him, he straddles a lot of bets. So even when he loses....he wins