May vs JMM was paid off and JMM won the 2nd fight vs PAC

F8ck the poll. Who;s that big boob woman?

TS truly is a shit poster

Your threads are ATG pieces of crap. http://thumbs.newschoolers.com/index.php?src=http://www.gifbin.com/bin/052009/1243271414_black_guy_laughing.gif&size=400x1000

Your threads are ATG pieces of crap.

this guy is a trip

I'm not a fan or buy into the conspiracy theories of boxing as if it were on an existing basis. More so that the logic of throwing the 'bout when you could've won is that doing so favors you more. Clottey could've lost in a less boring manner and still be "sellable" so if he was going to throw the bout to Pac, he may as well done so in a way that wouldn't have thrashed his career forever and still ensure 1 decent future paycheck. Mosley is the worse example, frankly it is. The guy does have everything to gain and if he did beat Mayweather, he'd be the prime target for Pac ensuring at least a bigger share of the PPVs (not a lion's share but larger than what he could now command) and would command a larger crowd draw than he does now. The way I look at Mosley, at his age he needs to be more active on a consistent basis and that 18 month layoff didn't help. He also showed in his bout with Cotto he adjusts to changes in style longer than you'd like to see. If someone said he should've won against Cotto and that was a conspiracy, its a plausible idea. Not on the Mayweather. Marquez vs Mayweather is interesting given everything to gain but Mayweather had advantages in all arenas. The other facts that don't get mentioned by Floyd nuthuggers is that it was the first bout at that weight for Marquez and he seemed to move poorly in training camps (you should really watch the vids of it)but also we really dont know how much in weight Mayweather came into that bout. For all we know he could've weighed as Margarito did for Pac and that uncertainty casts a shadow on how much of an advantage Mayweather had alone in size going into that ring. Another thing I'd put on the table is Mosley and Marquez are pride fighters like Pac; these guys want cash but they carry tons of pride to just throw away a bout for the sake of a paycheck. One way to look at it is Morrales has no problems going into a bout with Pac right now and getting slaughtered but he wouldn't throw the 'bout, he'd give in an honest effort. These types of "conspiracy ideas" reflect poorly not on the winner but looser: Marquez would have to be buyable and so would Mosley and frankly I don't buy it. Both guys would fight the good fight even if they knew the odds were against them winning but they'd still give it their all. They could be in the ring against Andre War in his weight division and they'd still fight to the bitter end.good stuff and add to all of this---shane is in line fine to fight manny--so why would he throw the fight against floyd when he asked to fight manny twice, with no success even at catchweight and not he's an option for manny--of course after he loses by wide, really wide ud to floyd and a draw to mora--now, manny may want to fight him--at 147 i think-lol--- let me ask him this--and maybe you can try to ask him too? do you think shane will throw the fight for manny? since that's what he does---i mean, of course it's floyd, so people have to be paid to lose against him---let's not take into account how fukking talented this kid is, how nasty his skills are---how hard it is to beat him, and how hard it's always been to beat the fukker---always been--damn near impossible unless he has an injury before coming into the fight--- now, let's not say how clottey looked against manny--that fight looked stage--clottey didn't even throw until rounds 7 and 8--- now, shane rocked floyd in round 2---if that's getting paid to lose, then i don't want it if i'm floyd-lol--that's hard earned money-lol--

we think you're full of sh1t---any more questions?

size and styles proved to much for jmm. mayweather was to big and is also a great counter puncher, lets not forget that mayweather came in heavy into that fight so he probably had 10lbs on marquez the night of the fight. secondly jmm does well against fighters that pressure him and that night he was trying to pressure the bigger man with quicker hands and was getting countered easily.

Why would Floyd pay off a fighter he can clearly beat and he's better than him? Remember Floyd said he's a great big fighter and JMM is a great small fighter.

May is no match for Pac or JMM but money talks baby... thats all.. what da ya all think?:boxing: Hm, I need to rewatch the Mayweather-Marquez fight before making any conclusion.

When ur missing, getting countered, and entirely in affective. It's not only dumb for u to leave it all in the ring, it's very HARD to leave it all in the ring. Look what happened when Mayweather fought Corrales. Corrales left it all in the ring to.

Its ok if you think different than me just add your facts against mine and lets make this a discussion that is what a forum is for......... you had to disrispect me and I dont need to talk to trash like u dude.. did i mention you are a dick sucking homo cunt??:bling1:

One day the truth about how corrupt boxing will come out....I feel alot of big PVV fights are fixed. Pacquaio vs Clottey Mayweather vs Marquez Mayweather vs Moseley all three of the losers in those fight put on a terrible acting job of trying to fight. So yes TS I'm with you on your theory. I'm not a fan or buy into the conspiracy theories of boxing as if it were on an existing basis. More so that the logic of throwing the 'bout when you could've won is that doing so favors you more. Clottey could've lost in a less boring manner and still be "sellable" so if he was going to throw the bout to Pac, he may as well done so in a way that wouldn't have thrashed his career forever and still ensure 1 decent future paycheck. Mosley is the worse example, frankly it is. The guy does have everything to gain and if he did beat Mayweather, he'd be the prime target for Pac ensuring at least a bigger share of the PPVs (not a lion's share but larger than what he could now command) and would command a larger crowd draw than he does now. The way I look at Mosley, at his age he needs to be more active on a consistent basis and that 18 month layoff didn't help. He also showed in his bout with Cotto he adjusts to changes in style longer than you'd like to see. If someone said he should've won against Cotto and that was a conspiracy, its a plausible idea. Not on the Mayweather. Marquez vs Mayweather is interesting given everything to gain but Mayweather had advantages in all arenas. The other facts that don't get mentioned by Floyd nuthuggers is that it was the first bout at that weight for Marquez and he seemed to move poorly in training camps (you should really watch the vids of it)but also we really dont know how much in weight Mayweather came into that bout. For all we know he could've weighed as Margarito did for Pac and that uncertainty casts a shadow on how much of an advantage Mayweather had alone in size going into that ring. Another thing I'd put on the table is Mosley and Marquez are pride fighters like Pac; these guys want cash but they carry tons of pride to just throw away a bout for the sake of a paycheck. One way to look at it is Morrales has no problems going into a bout with Pac right now and getting slaughtered but he wouldn't throw the 'bout, he'd give in an honest effort. These types of "conspiracy ideas" reflect poorly not on the winner but looser: Marquez would have to be buyable and so would Mosley and frankly I don't buy it. Both guys would fight the good fight even if they knew the odds were against them winning but they'd still give it their all. They could be in the ring against Andre War in his weight division and they'd still fight to the bitter end.

One day the truth about how corrupt boxing will come out....I feel alot of big PVV fights are fixed. Pacquaio vs Clottey Mayweather vs Marquez Mayweather vs Moseley all three of the losers in those fight put on a terrible acting job of trying to fight. So yes TS I'm with you on your theory. Thanks for sharing at least I am not the only one that doubts some of the fights I feel better.

Its ok if you think different than me just add your facts against mine and lets make this a discussion that is what a forum is for......... you had to disrispect me and I dont need to talk to trash like u dude..

One day the truth about how corrupt boxing will come out....I feel alot of big PVV fights are fixed. Pacquaio vs Clottey Mayweather vs Marquez Mayweather vs Moseley all three of the losers in those fight put on a terrible acting job of trying to fight. So yes TS I'm with you on your theory.

I dont care what people say but the fight of JMM vs May was planned I can see how May is a bigger fighter but every boxer has a trademark and JMM trademark is dying on the ring even when he loses. He did not even try that night... just watch the fight and you will notice how weak his punches are with NO PRECISION and believe me there is no one no one with a more precise punch than JMM... Also I want to comment that Pac did not win the 2nd fight against JMM that was a steal... the more I watch the fight and even the same day the fight happened I saw JMM winning the fight. May is no match for Pac or JMM but money talks baby... thats all.. what da ya all think?:boxing: we all think you are a dick sucking homo cunt!:smashfrea

Even if he was better every fighter has a trademark style and JMM is not a boxer that loses a fight without a fight u get what I am saying........ its ridiculous

Pay him to lose what a stupd question lol