wow, this thread really exposes how NEW some of you are to boxing. Somebody said Pacquiao was pound for pound #1 in 2005? Wow. Just wow.
Do a LITTLE research before you actually start typing, ok little guys?
My bad, I thought it was consecutive weeks at #1.
Nah, Sugar Nikolay Valuev is the only fighter who could legitimately accomplish that...which is why Ring makes him ineligible for that sort of thing.
Who lost and remained number one? This is how long he has been on the top ten list not how long he's been number one.
My bad, I thought it was consecutive weeks at #1.
How does someone lose and remain #1 and how does someone not fight for 18 months and remain in the top ten.
Pac lost to Morales in '05, how is it possible that he ramained #1 even though he didn't beat Morales until '06. I would understand 5 years in a row, but not 7.
http://i939.photobucket.com/albums/ad236/ummeed/1288516474586.gif
How does someone lose and remain #1 and how does someone not fight for 18 months and remain in the top ten.
Pac lost to Morales in '05, how is it possible that he ramained #1 even though he didn't beat Morales until '06. I would understand 5 years in a row, but not 7.
Who lost and remained number one? This is how long he has been on the top ten list not how long he's been number one.
How many fighters have done this? I really don't know. Anybody? Whitaker? Chavez? Anybody know?
http://i51.tinypic.com/21dg9zn.jpg
How does someone lose and remain #1 and how does someone not fight for 18 months and remain in the top ten.
Pac lost to Morales in '05, how is it possible that he ramained #1 even though he didn't beat Morales until '06. I would understand 5 years in a row, but not 7.
How many fighters have done this? I really don't know. Anybody? Whitaker? Chavez? Anybody know?
http://i51.tinypic.com/21dg9zn.jpg
Bob Arum deserves that spot :rofl:
7 years and still scared of a OST :lol1:
not to mention the OST is worth 60 million :wave:
Yep a win over Morales (who had just lost to Raheem) and a draw and a lucky win over JMM really should have knocked Mayweather from the #1 spot. :dunce:
Well they were better fighters than anyone FLoyd fought at the time!
Many have been i suppose. But when Floyd was no1 p4p he shouldnt really have been really. Pac was always no1, its just cos floyd was there first they just thought they would keep him there until Pac and floyd fought each other.
But pac has always been fighting and beating the bigger names since barreera.
Yep a win over Morales (who had just lost to Raheem) and a draw and a lucky win over JMM really should have knocked Mayweather from the #1 spot. :dunce:
Many have been i suppose. But when Floyd was no1 p4p he shouldnt really have been really. Pac was always no1, its just cos floyd was there first they just thought they would keep him there until Pac and floyd fought each other.
But pac has always been fighting and beating the bigger names since barreera.
floyd's early reign was pretty solid bro. don't let the current floyd fool you, before he broke his hand and started acting like a fckin clown, pbf had a decent run.
Many have been i suppose. But when Floyd was no1 p4p he shouldnt really have been really. Pac was always no1, its just cos floyd was there first they just thought they would keep him there until Pac and floyd fought each other.
But pac has always been fighting and beating the bigger names since barreera.
Anybody know the time for Mayweather? It wouldn't surprise me if he was on from 1998 to 2008. I have to think Chavez, Whitaker and ODLH had long runs there too.