And any of the so-called slicker black fighters out htere!! Pacquiao is slicker than any of Mayweather's opponents in his career. Pacquiao being slicker than Mosley, Judah, and Demarcus Corley (Mayweather's slickest opponents) is easily proved by four words. Miguel Cotto outboxed all three.
I personally picked Mosley to beat Mayweather, I admit I picked on passions and not intellect. Throughout, I knew in the back of my head I knew that the fact Cotto outboxed Mosley, if Mayweather followed what Cotto did he would win. And, that's exactly what happened. Mayweather imitated Cotto's fight of picking Mosley apart with the jab, coming forward and closing the distance, sometimes following with the right hand.
Cotto could not do this to Pacquiao. Another thing to know about Pacquiao, is that guys like Mayweather, and fighter like him, they fight "slick" because that is their only option, or they don't have the means to fight in the offensive manner Manny Pacquiao does. Look at what Pacquiao did in the Margarito fight. He fought about a minute, dancing, sticking and moving, as if to say "look at how untouchable I am when I do this" (this was in the mid rounds, about the 4th or 5th).
Another important factor in Pacquiao's style is that Manny Pacquiao, in many of his best combinations, scores knockdowns and very effective punches when it seems difficult to do so. This is really how he beat guys like Margarito and Cotto. Early on in the Margarito fight Pacquiao was landing miracle shots on the inside, something Mayweather could NEVER do.
So my point is, that just because Pacquiao isn't content with winning the fight in the snoozy manner Mayweather beat Baldomir, odes not mean Pacquiao isn't a slick fighter. A lot of talk about how Pacquiao hasn't fought or beat a slick black fighter (which even made ESPN headlines) is unmerited.
PACQUIAO IS SLICKER THAN THE SLICKEST AFRO-AMERICAN FIGHTER OUT THERE. Yes, he's as slick or slicker than Mayweather. He has better footwork, that's for sure.
what makes you think or suspicious that manny is on JUICE? because he is beating old, shot, drained and past prime boxers?:owned2:
Shane Mosley is older than any opponent Pac has faced.
That's why he is special. He is a rare gem. And that is why there is only one Sugar Ray Robinson, Ali, Henry Armstrong,Michael Jordan. If everyone can do what they do. Then they ain't special no more.
Good point, but I'd argue Pacquiao>>>Ali P4P...Ali was too defensive, ran away and covered up.
Why don't Pactards want to admit Manny Pacquiao is on that ****? No fighter can move up in weight as quickly as Pac and not lose any speed or power. Does his refusal to take OST not make this obvious?
Straight flomo right here.
Manny is not slick, Manny is just very busy. Walking forward throwing punches on the off foot does not make you slick. And when was the last time you watched a fighter go up in weight nearly 50% of his original fighting weight and carry his power with him. Did somebody say juiced?...........Rockin':boxing:
Another pinhead in the house
u dont kno wat ur talking about if u say mayweather fights slick because he has to. he fights that way because its proven effective time and time again. ur analysis makes no sense. and pac isnt slicker than mayweather. dont let hate cloud ur head with stupidity. its a very feminine thing to do.
oh yea btw. while one can make the argument that judah is slick, there is no way in hell anyone ever considered mosely slick. he isnt and never has been.
Who is the slickest blackie Mayweather's fought then?
Well then, Manny Pacquiao just chooses to knock his opponents out/give a good performance.
Manny would've knocked Baldy out in 6 or 7 rounds
Pac showed in Marg fight that he can be a very good counterpuncher or smooth slick fighter but he prefers bringing excitement to fans by re-arranging the faces of his opponents. Marg can only hits him when Pac purposely stands stationary or going in the ropes but most of the time he can makes Marg misses his shots every time he wants too.
You're kidding me right? Anyone would look slick against Margarito. Sorry but counter punching a guy who takes 15 seconds to throw a jab is not 'good'. I was impressive however in the Cotto fight were he completely took away Cotto's jab.
Pac showed in Marg fight that he can be a very good counterpuncher or smooth slick fighter but he prefers bringing excitement to fans by re-arranging the faces of his opponents. Marg can only hits him when Pac purposely stands stationary or going in the ropes but most of the time he can makes Marg misses his shots every time he wants too.
Why don't Pactards want to admit Manny Pacquiao is on that ****? No fighter can move up in weight as quickly as Pac and not lose any speed or power. Does his refusal to take OST not make this obvious?
yeh fighters stamina punch output punch resistance and power dnt suddenly ****e up once they reach 30
Manny is not slick, Manny is just very busy. Walking forward throwing punches on the off foot does not make you slick. And when was the last time you watched a fighter go up in weight nearly 50% of his original fighting weight and carry his power with him. Did somebody say juiced?...........Rockin':boxing:
That's why he is special. He is a rare gem. And that is why there is only one Sugar Ray Robinson, Ali, Henry Armstrong,Michael Jordan. If everyone can do what they do. Then they ain't special no more.
And any of the so-called slicker black fighters out htere!! Pacquiao is slicker than any of Mayweather's opponents in his career. Pacquiao being slicker than Mosley, Judah, and Demarcus Corley (Mayweather's slickest opponents) is easily proved by four words. Miguel Cotto outboxed all three.
I personally picked Mosley to beat Mayweather, I admit I picked on passions and not intellect. Throughout, I knew in the back of my head I knew that the fact Cotto outboxed Mosley, if Mayweather followed what Cotto did he would win. And, that's exactly what happened. Mayweather imitated Cotto's fight of picking Mosley apart with the jab, coming forward and closing the distance, sometimes following with the right hand.
Cotto could not do this to Pacquiao. Another thing to know about Pacquiao, is that guys like Mayweather, and fighter like him, they fight "slick" because that is their only option, or they don't have the means to fight in the offensive manner Manny Pacquiao does. Look at what Pacquiao did in the Margarito fight. He fought about a minute, dancing, sticking and moving, as if to say "look at how untouchable I am when I do this" (this was in the mid rounds, about the 4th or 5th).
Another important factor in Pacquiao's style is that Manny Pacquiao, in many of his best combinations, scores knockdowns and very effective punches when it seems difficult to do so. This is really how he beat guys like Margarito and Cotto. Early on in the Margarito fight Pacquiao was landing miracle shots on the inside, something Mayweather could NEVER do.
So my point is, that just because Pacquiao isn't content with winning the fight in the snoozy manner Mayweather beat Baldomir, odes not mean Pacquiao isn't a slick fighter. A lot of talk about how Pacquiao hasn't fought or beat a slick black fighter (which even made ESPN headlines) is unmerited.
PACQUIAO IS SLICKER THAN THE SLICKEST AFRO-AMERICAN FIGHTER OUT THERE. Yes, he's as slick or slicker than Mayweather. He has better footwork, that's for sure.
Good point. Props man!
Why don't Pactards want to admit Manny Pacquiao is on that ****? No fighter can move up in weight as quickly as Pac and not lose any speed or power. Does his refusal to take OST not make this obvious?
And any of the so-called slicker black fighters out htere!! Pacquiao is slicker than any of Mayweather's opponents in his career. Pacquiao being slicker than Mosley, Judah, and Demarcus Corley (Mayweather's slickest opponents) is easily proved by four words. Miguel Cotto outboxed all three.
I personally picked Mosley to beat Mayweather, I admit I picked on passions and not intellect. Throughout, I knew in the back of my head I knew that the fact Cotto outboxed Mosley, if Mayweather followed what Cotto did he would win. And, that's exactly what happened. Mayweather imitated Cotto's fight of picking Mosley apart with the jab, coming forward and closing the distance, sometimes following with the right hand.
Cotto could not do this to Pacquiao. Another thing to know about Pacquiao, is that guys like Mayweather, and fighter like him, they fight "slick" because that is their only option, or they don't have the means to fight in the offensive manner Manny Pacquiao does. Look at what Pacquiao did in the Margarito fight. He fought about a minute, dancing, sticking and moving, as if to say "look at how untouchable I am when I do this" (this was in the mid rounds, about the 4th or 5th).
Another important factor in Pacquiao's style is that Manny Pacquiao, in many of his best combinations, scores knockdowns and very effective punches when it seems difficult to do so. This is really how he beat guys like Margarito and Cotto. Early on in the Margarito fight Pacquiao was landing miracle shots on the inside, something Mayweather could NEVER do.
So my point is, that just because Pacquiao isn't content with winning the fight in the snoozy manner Mayweather beat Baldomir, odes not mean Pacquiao isn't a slick fighter. A lot of talk about how Pacquiao hasn't fought or beat a slick black fighter (which even made ESPN headlines) is unmerited.
PACQUIAO IS SLICKER THAN THE SLICKEST AFRO-AMERICAN FIGHTER OUT THERE. Yes, he's as slick or slicker than Mayweather. He has better footwork, that's for sure.
u dont kno wat ur talking about if u say mayweather fights slick because he has to. he fights that way because its proven effective time and time again. ur analysis makes no sense. and pac isnt slicker than mayweather. dont let hate cloud ur head with stupidity. its a very feminine thing to do.
oh yea btw. while one can make the argument that judah is slick, there is no way in hell anyone ever considered mosely slick. he isnt and never has been.