Your post makes perfect sense if you switch the names around.
Tyson was destroyed and ruined by Lennox. That was one of the most brutal one-sided beatdowns of all time. Tyson became a shot fighter and was never the same after getting annihilated by Lennox.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/07/11/article-0-0089DC0500000578-722_468x378.jpg
LOL,,,thats pretty funny considering most felt tyson was already shot when holyfield man handled him
Williams was destroyed and ruined by Vitali. That was one of the most brutal one-sided beatdowns of all time. Williams became a shot fighter and was never the same after getting annihilated by Vitali.
Your post makes perfect sense if you switch the names around.
Tyson was destroyed and ruined by Lennox. That was one of the most brutal one-sided beatdowns of all time. Tyson became a shot fighter and was never the same after getting annihilated by Lennox.
Haye was never undisputed champ of anything.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/07/11/article-0-0089DC0500000578-722_468x378.jpg
exactly. "old" is whatever suits your biased opinions.
when vitali beats fighters younger than him age means nothing
when vitali made lennox look bad age meant everything
Wait for Haye to heroically come out and say "lets make this happen!" when Vitali turns 40 in a few months and retires. Then Haye can say Vitali ducked him. And the crosseyed british retards on this forum will nod in agreement.
Old basically means past prime, Briggs is way further past his prime than Vitali is. Stop the BS.
haye doesnt have enough fights to even be considered in serious all-time KO ratio records, or else wed probably find some guy who was HW champion for 1 fight in the 1800s then retired and rank his astounding 100% ko ratio #1
vitali lost on a cut but was obviously winning the fight
and to the people who say vitali beat an "old" briggs, do any of you comprehend the fact that vitali is actually OLDER than briggs is? vitali has been past prime for years and years but nobody mentions it because he never loses
Vitali's injury allowed him to basically rest his body for all those years, he can't be compared to a boxer that has been fighting year after year after year. Briggs is so out of his prime it's not even funny, I remember in the Ibragimov fight he was winded after the first few rounds and only threw about 30 punches the entire 12 rounds.
haye doesnt have enough fights to even be considered in serious all-time KO ratio records, or else wed probably find some guy who was HW champion for 1 fight in the 1800s then retired and rank his astounding 100% ko ratio #1
vitali lost on a cut but was obviously winning the fight
and to the people who say vitali beat an "old" briggs, do any of you comprehend the fact that vitali is actually OLDER than briggs is? vitali has been past prime for years and years but nobody mentions it because he never loses
An "old" fighter doesn't have to be older in age. :smashfrea
Danny Williams stopped Tyson faster than Lennox did.
Williams was destroyed and ruined by Vitali. That was on of the most brutal one-sided beatdowns of all time. Williams was shot after that beatdown, he was never the same.
Fraudley is 1-1 against shot Williams.
You use past prime fighters to try and prove the Klitschko's are better than Lewis, but call them shot when someone does it against to the Klitschko's. You are a complete nuthuggin fool.
Lewis went life and death with Briggs. He was badly hurt several times and almost KTFO by Briggs.
Vitali is 40 years old and well past his physical prime. He dominated every second or every round and destroyed Briggs. It was a massacre. The fight should have been stopped. Rounds 6,7,8,9,10,12 were all 10-8 rounds. Prime Vitali would've KO'd Briggs.
Lewis was brutally KTFO by Rahman.
Wlad easily destroyed Rahman.
Lewis couldn't stop Levi Billups.
Vitali destroyed Levi Billups in 2 rounds.
Lewis went life and death with Mercer and got a controversial decision. Many people thought Mercer won that fight.
Wlad annihilated Mercer in 6 rounds. He became the first man to knockdown and KO Mercer.
Vitali dominated Lewis and scared him into retirement. That's a FACT.
Audley Harrison stopped Williams faster than Prime Vitali. :rofl:
obviously haye's "HW champion KO ratio" isnt legitimate since he's barely fought at HW and the belt he holds (WBA) hasn't represented the actual HW champion in a millennium, im sure you could pull up 10 other guys with "ratios" of that nature but theyre simply not counted for the sake of reality
but to the guy who said lennox kicked vitalis ass... try actually watching the fight
.
Ive seen the fight more times than anyone on this site...Answer me this... Why did Vitali look like a used Tampon and Lennox walked away with a clean face?
As far as Hayes Ko ratio I will say this for the last time:
Cruiserweight= 200 lbs = Classic Heavyweight
The mean average weight of Haye's opponents is higher than that of Ali, Jack Dempsey and most Heavyweight greats.
If you really want to get fussy about it, Haye's KO ratio of opponents who weighed 200-299 lbs is 100%.
Haye matched Sprott by KOing Audley in the 3rd round. Sprotts win is better obviously, but Hayes result is the same, he did no worse.
Ironic how you are bringing up past fights today, when you were against it in the matter of Vitali/Lennox/Briggs.
Vitali failed to KO a shell of shannon briggs 13 years after lennox demolished him. That is much worse.
http://i53.tinypic.com/5mzwat.gif
Right, Vitaly almost killed Briggs, but why look at the facts and Briggs actually hurt Lewis in their fight, he didn't even make Vitaly blink...
Don't forget Mercer went full 12 with Lewis and Wlad anihilated him...
Oh and both Wlad and Vitaly have higher KO% than Lewis...
Lewis had his moma meet with Vitaly so she could tell him whether he should rematch him or not, she told him no, so he retired... LOL
obviously haye's "HW champion KO ratio" isnt legitimate since he's barely fought at HW and the belt he holds (WBA) hasn't represented the actualy HW champion in a millennium
but to the guy who said lennox kicked vitalis ass... try actually watching the fight
i understand that british people are excited to be involved in something other than soccer (even if haye looks about as "british" as a mayweather) but you guys need to calm down because its starting to seem like a self-parody
What's that supposed to mean?
- Tomato can Sprott did better against Fraudley than Haye did.
.
Haye matched Sprott by KOing Audley in the 3rd round. Sprotts win is better obviously, but Hayes result is the same, he did no worse.
Ironic how you are bringing up past fights today, when you were against it in the matter of Vitali/Lennox/Briggs.
Vitali failed to KO a shell of shannon briggs 13 years after lennox demolished him. That is much worse.
http://i53.tinypic.com/5mzwat.gif
Diva Gaye, the best at knocking out 40+ year old has beens and never wasis, congrats you delusional Brits have a hero to hang your Union Jack on. Too bad he is also a coward, liar, and a vagina that got KTFO by a 40 year old SMW. His KO% at HW is 80% against 40+ year old bums, bums he is 10+ years younger than.
Also too bad that he will be forced into exile by the Klitschkos some time next year. That's two British chumpions the Klitschkos would have retired, first it was Lennox now Gaye. Except Lennox was at least man enough to face Vitaly one time. Gaye will run into retirement without even facing one of the Klitschkos.
You all can enjoy that Brit-Cypriot Vagina for another fight or two until he gets retired by the Klitschkos next year at 31, then maybe you all can find another coward to worship. Too da loo Gaye Boyz...