If you were in their situation would you want, or be able, to fight your brother to be crowned undisputed HW champ?
I don't have a brother but I couldn't imagine inflicting pain on them like I'd have to in order to win.
Wouldn't it feel unnatural and wrong every single moment your in the ring and throwing shots?
Or could you just go into fight mode and switch it off for 36 mins (or less)?
I respect the Klitschko's for taking their stance.
Just think it is interesting to hear your views.
id do it i have an older brother whom i ****ed up and i doubt either klit can cause each other the damage the damage i gave to him broken ribs broken jaw 4 mssing teeth broken nose severe concussion internal bleeding they had him hooked on machines after what i did to him and no i didnt use any weapons
Not really. And if I did I wouldn't be able to give it my all, and I doubt he would either, making the whole undertaking somewhat pointless both from a viewer's point of view and as a means of determining the undisputed number 1.
Yes i agree, but what i find intriguing is that it seems they haven't fought due to their mother rightly objecting. Making it appear that they would be open to it if it weren't for their mother.
If any of you have any sort of common sense, you would realize you should never be forced to fight your brother. If they were made to fight each other they would probably both retire instead.
Well some would argue that it is necessary. because one of them would be able to be called Undisputed Heavtweight Champ of the world. Something that is very rare in boxing history
Dont matter
If a boxer cant give it all that he has, then he shouldnt be fighting.
A brother wont finish his brother off and KO him when he has him hurt
Undisputed champ is not necessary
Well some would argue that it is necessary because one of them would be able to be called Undisputed Heavyweight Champ of the world. Something that is very rare in boxing history