To All Of NSB's Racists

And you can go back to being a bigoted coward. Mayweather-Hatton "bad for boxing" huh? LOL Bigoted coward? In what way? Because I don't think Mayweather Hatton was great for boxing? You and that other twit can't even say why it was good.

i like the brothers dont think their boring but lets be real the hw division is weak

Same thing used to be said about Larry Holmes when he was champ. And Lennox Lewis........

I've never, ever said Mayweather should change his style to please anyone. All of my criticisms of him are his choice of opponents. You can now go back to fvcking yourself. And you can go back to being a bigoted coward. Mayweather-Hatton "bad for boxing" huh? LOL

just remember people, G Dog is watching

The legendary heavyweights of your generation, the Ali and Louis of your time, are white men. There is no one alive who can defeat them TODAY. The most prestigious crown in all of sport are shared by the Brothers Klitschko for nearly ten years. Instead of crying about how they are 'just tall' or 'boring' or 'robotic', why don't you all be REAL MEN and just come out and say it. You hate them, and you hate their dominance, and you burn inside because you know the truth. That the great heavyweights of your time are white. http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/image.php?u=101673&dateline=1269705866

Finding the Klitz boring, unentertaining, and uninspiring does not make you a racists. It makes you a non fan of the Klit Brothers.

The legendary heavyweights of your generation, the Ali and Louis of your time, are white men. There is no one alive who can defeat them TODAY. The most prestigious crown in all of sport are shared by the Brothers Klitschko for nearly ten years. Instead of crying about how they are 'just tall' or 'boring' or 'robotic', why don't you all be REAL MEN and just come out and say it. You hate them, and you hate their dominance, and you burn inside because you know the truth. That the great heavyweights of your time are white. Same thing used to be said about Larry Holmes when he was champ.

Isn't that what you wan't Mayweather to do? I've never, ever said Mayweather should change his style to please anyone. All of my criticisms of him are his choice of opponents. You can now go back to fvcking yourself.

So he should get out of his comfort zone to please you? Isn't that what you wan't Mayweather to do?

thats because MIke Tyson destroyed them and took them out early like it should have been. Wlad lets these terrible heavyweights go until the very last few rounds and then it takes his world class trainer to tell him they shouldn't be in this fight with you right now, take them out. Like I said in my earlier post, he wants respect and to be mentioned in the history section with the other great heavyweights, then be a great heavyweight by taking these weak heavyweights out early if hes that much damn better then all of them. Notice nobody hates on Vital, I am a huge fan of his. Vital-Arreola is one of my favorite heavyweight fights in a real long time. But all Wlad does is 1-2 to the smaller skilled fighters, and 1-2 then leap in a clinch with the bigger fighters. YOU CANT SAY PETER CLINCHED AT THE BEGINNING OF THAT FIGHT! Peter was trying to throw haymakers from range and when he did Wlad would leap in right away initiating the clinch. Simply, if Wlad is really about it, and really is one of the best heavyweights of all time, PROVE IT! Take these bums out early and stop carrying them. Be about it. So he should get out of his comfort zone to please you?

The legendary heavyweights of your generation, the Ali and Louis of your time, are white men. There is no one alive who can defeat them TODAY. The most prestigious crown in all of sport are shared by the Brothers Klitschko for nearly ten years. Instead of crying about how they are 'just tall' or 'boring' or 'robotic', why don't you all be REAL MEN and just come out and say it. You hate them, and you hate their dominance, and you burn inside because you know the truth. That the great heavyweights of your time are white. WaPost Headline Declares, "Race a Dominant Theme at Summit: Subject Seen as Drawing Leaders Closer", with WaPost Using the Word "Race" Nine Times in One Article. Although many people, particularly the white-news media, act as though they are unaware of it, the Human Genome Project has proved that "race" is a fallacy with no basis in science. According to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Human Genome Program, DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. While different genes for physical traits such as skin and hair color can be identified between individuals, no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another. There also is no genetic basis for divisions of human ethnicity. People who have lived in the same geographic region for many generations may have some alleles in common, but no allele will be found in all members of one population and in no members of any other. In other words, while the concept of separate human sub-species called "races" was developed four hundred years ago, during a time when white supremacists and the slave trade were seeking to justify the enslavement of Blacks, as well as the social, economic and political exaltation of whites, however, the most recent in-depth study of human DNA ever completed has shown that "race" does not exist. This certainly ought to be news, particularly in light of how often the word "race"continues to be used by the white-news media. For example, in a Washington Post article entitled, "Race a Dominant Theme at Summit: Subject Seen as Drawing Leaders Closer", I saw and counted the word "race" used nine times, discussing the importance of "race" for President Barack Obama's trip to the Latin American summit. Considering that "race" has been proved not to exist as a matter of scientific Government-approved fact, one would expect that the news media would begin using alternate words to refer to factors that DO exist, like skin color. But, the news media (and many Black bloggers) still stubbornly insist that "race" exists after the theory of its existence has been utterly disproven. I know the news media's motive. They are trying to help us Blacks to maintain our sense of identity in a rapidly changing world. Yeah, right! :) In fact, they are trying to help WHITES maintain their sense of superior identity in a rapidly changing world -- a world in which science is utterly disproving the fundamental theories of biology upon which white supremacy has been based. When people say, "my race", they might as well be saying "my fairy wings" as far as science is concerned. For example, "I am black, and what affects my race affects me," says Bennett, who also works part-time in criminal defense. "I feel that I am exposing things that people, black and white, try to hide. In my own way I am trying to force an honest debate and open dialogue." LATimes Of course, if you remove the phrase "my race" and insert the phrase "my skin color group", then the laudable statement of solidarity makes perfect political sense. It also makes biological sense, because "skin color" is something that actually exists. In light of the findings of the Human Genome Project, the American Journal of Color Arousal still uses the term "racist" but redefines it: A "racist" is "a person, organization or institution continuing to believe in, advocate, perpetuate or passively accept the proposition that there are separate 'races' among the human species, in spite of all of the well-known Human Genome Project evidence that separate human "races" do not exist. The continued use of the word "race", regardless of how or why it is used, will inevitably lead to prolonged belief in the unscientific fallacy of separate "races" within the human species, with a continued reluctance to adjust to the biological, social and political ramifications of the new genomic evidence.

I don't see why if you don't like someone for one reason or the other that makes you a racist . the race card is used way too much these days and for silly reasons , hey everyone is entitled to thier opinion .

Oh lord. Does anybody remember how disrespected Larry Holmes HW dominance was? He finally got respect when his dominance was over. So did Lennox Lewis, he didn't get his respect till the tail end of his career. I know they were not white. So what was the reason? Oh and they didn't finish their dominance with the likes of Sonowski, Briggs, or Peters.

The Klit Brothers will NEVER be mentioned in the same breath as Ali or Louis... And they shouldn't be.

well americans love Bernard Hopkins.. right hand, hold.. right hand, headbutt, hold... jab, hold, right hand.. also Peter did most of the holding. Chambers didnt and Wlad jabbed-righthanded him without any holding. Wlad has a monster left hook btw You're absolutely right, which is why you always hear of his amazing ticket sales and Pacquiao/Mayweather-like PPV numbers! :sarcasm1:

The Klit Brothers will NEVER be mentioned in the same breath as Ali or Louis... they are frequently in this forum. The question is should they be?? not if you ask me. theyre good, but not that good

The Klit Brothers will NEVER be mentioned in the same breath as Ali or Louis...

you dont?!? :ugh: i admire his skills and acknowledge that he was very good aggresive offensive fighter aswell before turning 40. I do however believe Wladimir has been more fun to watch for the last 5 years. Yet americans critisise him and still love and defend Bernard

well americans love Bernard Hopkins..right hand, hold.. right hand, headbutt, hold... jab, hold, right hand.. also Peter did most of the holding. Chambers didnt and Wlad jabbed-righthanded him without any holding. Wlad has a monster left hook btw you dont?!? :ugh: