How many great undefeated fighters has Pacquiao beat?

I guess Baldomir, De La Hoya, and Judah were on killer runs when Floyd fought them weren't they? Corrales is the only guy that Floyd beat that hadn't been beat at the time he fought him. What about all these other gate keepers like Emmanuel Augustus, Brusseles, and Mitchell. Ironically, although Baldomir may be arugbally one of the wost Lineal Welterweights in history, he was actually on a 15 year unbeaten streak lol Oscar looked pretty good against Mayorga too.

Mayweather beat corrales and hatton when they both were on top of there games. It seems like the guys Pacquiao beat were either shot, weight drained, or coming off a loss. He beat some great fighters but none were undefeated and in there prime. And you still demand blood test to a guy whose opponents were "shot, weight drained, or coming off a loss." I told ya, these guys are clowns.

Being undefeated doesn't mean that you are great You obviously don't know **** about boxing. Marciano >>> that bum Ali :owned:

ouch, pactards owned ha Yes bruh. Pac might have beaten ATGs and HOFers (Barrera, Marquez, De La Hoya etc), but he never beat any unbeaten fighters. Fucking :owned:

Being undefeated doesn't mean that you are great

both are great fighters and future hall of famers. though Manny fought more future hall of famers. MAB, Morales, JMM, Oscar and Cotto. Floyd fought 3 hall of famers but way past their primes or old. Oscar, Mosley and a lightweight JMM. im not trying to discredit his resume but if Manny would fight Chris John in Jr Welterweight would that count as a great win? resume wise Manny fought better opponents. Floyds best win in his resume was against 38 yr old Mosley who lost to Cotto 3 years ago.

hatton makes a lot of excuses after fights hatton was 152 when he fight at 140 and 152 when he fight at 147. which is better? Hatton makes a lot of excuses after fight? Anyways, you just need to look at his record and ask anyone around to understand in which division Hatton belonged. At 147: Wins = 1 , Losses = 1, KOs= 0 At 140: Wins = 44, Losses = 1, KOs= 32 As for the weight numbers you just stated in your comment, it doesn't mean that that person is better off fighting at 147. Actually, it could mean that he should fight at 140, if he trained properly. At 140, Hatton could use his style to wear out his opponents. Against the bigger Floyd at 147, the effects were not the same. Hatton had to do it against a bigger and stronger opponent(Floyd). Plus, Hatton's punches were not as effective at 147. There have been many cases where the boxer was great in one division but couldn't perform the same once he moved up a division. Hatton was not made for 147. There was NO PROOF that Hatton could perform well at 147.

He beat Jorge Solis and Emmanuel Lucero. But neither of them was world champ or ever became world champ. So the answer is zero. Btw, His name is Poochiao not Pacquiao. :lol1::lol1: actually solis won a 130 title.

arum prevented marg and cotto b.c he didnt want to pay. not floyd http://www.mytorontohomeimprovement.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/chinese-dog-paws.jpg this image........ http://www.afunnystuff.com/forumpics/roomfull.jpg

threads like this are no better than the dumbass threads pactards make...cant we just talk boxingI agree with you, Larryx.

Ummmm, JMM called Floyd out on live TV and agreed to everything. Ummmm, Ricky technically called Floyd out on live TV and agreed to everything. Did he agrees and knows Floyd will come fight night 3 lbs overweight of their weight contractual agreement from the very start of the negotiation? Did Ricky also agreed that he is going to be koed by the ring post?

Mayweather beat corrales and hatton when they both were on top of there games. It seems like the guys Pacquiao beat were either shot, weight drained, or coming off a loss. He beat some great fighters but none were undefeated and in there prime. Corrales and Hatton were good you're stupid if you think either of them were great though Pac-Barrera 1>any win of Floyd's and OMG, Marco wasn't even unbeaten! :omfg:

I'd prefer to look at Hatton's record and his own words to make up my mind if he was better at 140 or 147. Hatton said after the Floyd fight that there is a difference between the 140 Hatton and the 147 Hatton...... At 147: Wins = 1 , Losses = 1, KOs= 0 At 140: Wins = 44, Losses = 1, KOs= 32 hatton makes a lot of excuses after fights hatton was 152 when he fight at 140 and 152 when he fight at 147. which is better?

Most undefeated fighters nowadays aren't great. Just afraid of losing their '0'

147 had nothing to do with that fight. hatton was better at 147 because he didnt have to dry down I'd prefer to look at Hatton's record and his own words to make up my mind if he was better at 140 or 147. Hatton said after the Floyd fight that there is a difference between the 140 Hatton and the 147 Hatton...... At 147: Wins = 1 , Losses = 1, KOs= 0 At 140: Wins = 44, Losses = 1, KOs= 32

how many great undefeated fighters has any fighter beaten? how many GREAT PRIME fighters has any fighter beaten? the last fight i can remember that a fighter won a fight over a GREAT fighter that was undeniably in their PRIME was lennox lewis over vitali - and lennox really got his ass beat, he just lucked up and cut vitali. given lennox wasn't training hard and vitali took the fight on like 10 day notice so... you could have said margarito beat cotto, but margs is a cheating bastard. here is a better question in regards to all fighters: how many times has any said fighter taken on lesser opposition when more lucrative bouts against more dangerous opponents was on the table? these are the fighters that deserve heat.

BIGBOXINGFAG when you're not busy shoving replicas of floyd's babydick down your throat and/or ass/pusssy consider that making another floyd-pacquiao thread makes you a flomo shaped cunt with an erectyle dysfunction. does this shhit give you a better kick than rolling your ass on a floyd poster every night? fagggot.

Mayweather beat corrales and hatton when they both were on top of there games. It seems like the guys Pacquiao beat were either shot, weight drained, or coming off a loss. He beat some great fighters but none were undefeated and in there prime. what's with people's obsession with undefeated boxers? NONE of the top 5 ATGs were undefeated, nor were they undefeated when they were at their prime.

147 had nothing to do with that fight. hatton was better at 147 because he didnt have to dry down What,,, who dry what what?

Hatton: He had only fought once at 147 and didn't look good in the fight. His prime wins were ALL at 140. Hatton didn't have power in his fights at 147. Floyd fights Hatton at 147. Again, from your own words, we need to scratch Hatton from the list since he was NOT at the top of his game at 147. He NEVER was! 147 had nothing to do with that fight. hatton was better at 147 because he didnt have to dry down