Judges arent scoring fights using compubox stats, when one fighter is noticeably busier it can give the impression that they're winning. Its hard to analyze every punch to determine their effectiveness.
Judges IMO lately have not been scoring fights based on the rules of boxing. I feel more credit is being given to the more aggresive fighter. But the rules state the aggression has to be EFFECTIVE and a lot times that is not the case.
The bold is true but these men and women are supposed to be professionals and do a better job than what they have been doing IMO.
Do state commission review how judges score fights to determine if they are still competent and what they do?
Judges arent scoring fights using compubox stats, when one fighter is noticeably busier it can give the impression that they're winning. Its hard to analyze every punch to determine their effectiveness.
Mayweather/Delhoya
Was thinking this fight also but the fact that it was a split decision and considered close made me not want to reply with that fight.