Which of these guys deserves HOF consideration more? Miguel Cotto or Glen Johnson?

This was another one of my threads that I found pretty funny. Seriously, I know it's old people. But if Glen Johnson and Cotto get consideration for the HOF, why should Cotto go in first? Because of his popularity? It boggles my mind why Cotto leads this pole so one-sidedly.

iceta your man love for cotto is reaching ridiculous levels. if you come equipped with a labia majora you'd let cotto penetrate. don't deny it, cupcake.

It should easily be Johnson over Cotto if I had to pick though both guys will get in I am pretty sure. The poll results are disgraceful as Johnson has fought and beaten some very solid opposition in his time and even if it was for a brief period he was the undisputed champion at LHW regardless of whether all of the belt were at stake or not, IDK really and it doesn't matter. Cotto though he fought and beat some good opponents takes a real hit compared to Johnson getting stopped by a fighter 2 divisions smaller than himself and never having been the man at any weight class he fought in. What this dude said right here. :boxing: Johnson is still going strong at 41 with the pressure style he's got and Cotto is running from midgets at 30 years old. :boxing:

Remember guys. Call me an idiot all you want, but wins over guys like: Tarver Jones Harding Griffin Reggie Johnson Woods Cotto's resume consists of two razor close victories over Clottey and Mosley. Malinaggi isn't that good of a fighter. Corley, Torres, Quintana, Branco, Gomez, and Foreman are not better than the fighters listed above that Johnson beat. Sure the pole may be lopsided. But that's because Cotto has some of the most fanatical supporters on this site. I haven't heard one person give me a legitimate reason why Cotto should get voted in the HOF before Johnson does.

LMFAO @ ICETA........... 2 me none of da above at least Cotto no yet. But if to u a guy with a bunch of so many "almost wins" and so many "close defeats" is a HOF, I think u r as boxing smart as my pu$$y a$$ Yorkie Terrier.............

Definitely Cotto, but Johnson has made a mark in history as well.

At one point, I remember him being credible...now he seems radical and sure does seem to have an unhealthy obsession for Cotto like the above poster mentioned. I'm pretty sure he isn't a fan of Glenn Johnson, he's just looking for ways to discredit Cotto by bringing up Johnson of all people. Glenn Johnson is a good fighter no doubt, but he's far less accomplished than Cotto. Glenn Johnson loses to contenders and rising stars and Cotto brutalizes them. Its such a silly comparison... EDIT: I forgot...Johnson did beat Yusaf Mack...Cotto has nothing on that... Johnson has been a great fighter and has some great wins, although he is a little overrated on here because people like the jump on his wagon. Equally Cotto gets overrated on here somewhat due to the fanatical support that he has. Regardless, Iceta has, as always, failed to bring up any semi-logical arguments in his attempts to bash Cotto's name. He has reverted to "Lol, but Mosley lost decisively to Mayweather and Clottey lost decisively to Pacquiao! Lol", as his arguments. He is a fool with no idea whatsoever about boxing.

Neither one of them. WTF is are you guys smoking?

STFU Iceta you dirty cunt. Cotto is one of the best fighters of this era. You should stop your blind hate and jealousy.

Damn, the poll has spoken.

Sure, but its not even that. He is such a moron. He will hug Johnson's nuts incessantly for dropping close decisions to Cloud/Dawson/Tarver but then say Cotto is nothing because he "barely beat" elite guys like Shane and Clottey. The man is a joke. As I said, very close to the worst poster on these boards. At one point, I remember him being credible...now he seems radical and sure does seem to have an unhealthy obsession for Cotto like the above poster mentioned. I'm pretty sure he isn't a fan of Glenn Johnson, he's just looking for ways to discredit Cotto by bringing up Johnson of all people. Glenn Johnson is a good fighter no doubt, but he's far less accomplished than Cotto. Glenn Johnson loses to contenders and rising stars and Cotto brutalizes them. Its such a silly comparison... EDIT: I forgot...Johnson did beat Yusaf Mack...Cotto has nothing on that...

Yeah, I love how he thinks the Floyd fighting the 2010 version of SSM is better than Cotto fighting the 2007 version... Sure, but its not even that. He is such a moron. He will hug Johnson's nuts incessantly for dropping close decisions to Cloud/Dawson/Tarver but then say Cotto is nothing because he "barely beat" elite guys like Shane and Clottey. The man is a joke. As I said, very close to the worst poster on these boards.

LoL...Floyd and Pac are the best fighters in the last 10 years...Glen Johnson is the most over glorified gatekeeper in the modern era...all his 'big' wins were all against out of prime dudes as well. Him and Tarver...riding the Roy Jones KO until the day they die. Glen Johnson will be buffing Cotto's HoF bust while Johnson will be crying more robberies. In an era of 100 titles per weight class, Glen managed to win just 1 of the alphabet titles. You do anything to discredit Cotto. Just give it a rest man. We get it, you hate Cotto...there isn't any reason to keep these pointless threads I think Iceta wishes he was buffing Cotto's you know what. LOL

For someone who hates Cotto so much, it seems more like a crush you have on the man. Damn get of his jock strap already. You post on all of Cotto's threats, and now you are starting threats about the guy. If you do not like the guy, why always on Cotto's threats? I don't know about everyone else, but it sure sounds like an obsession to me. It is a little to much for someone who hates someone but is always talking about them. That is not hate, my man, that is love. You have a crush on Cotto. Give it up, you have been exposed. :luvbed:

So what? Because Mosley was soundly beaten by Mayweather does that mean that Cotto's victory isn't a good one? You act like a guy getting beaten decisively by the two best fighters in the world over the past decade means that any victory over them is meaningless. You are a joke. Went to hit you with red again, couldn't, it was too soon. As far as I am concerned you are one of the very worst posters on here. At least those foolish trolls that don't know shit don't try to act like they are serious. You attempt to put across that you know what you are talking about. Yeah, I love how he thinks the Floyd fighting the 2010 version of SSM is better than Cotto fighting the 2007 version...

Cotto barely beat Mosley. Barely beat Clottey. And both of those guys were beaten decisively by Floyd and Pac respectively. Lol. So what? Because Mosley was soundly beaten by Mayweather does that mean that Cotto's victory isn't a good one? You act like a guy getting beaten decisively by the two best fighters in the world over the past decade means that any victory over them is meaningless. You are a joke. Went to hit you with red again, couldn't, it was too soon. As far as I am concerned you are one of the very worst posters on here. At least those foolish trolls that don't know shit don't try to act like they are serious. You attempt to put across that you know what you are talking about.

I like both of umm and hope they both make it.

Cotto barely beat Mosley. Barely beat Clottey. And both of those guys were beaten decisively by Floyd and Pac respectively. Lol. LoL...Floyd and Pac are the best fighters in the last 10 years...Glen Johnson is the most over glorified gatekeeper in the modern era...all his 'big' wins were all against out of prime dudes as well. Him and Tarver...riding the Roy Jones KO until the day they die. Glen Johnson will be buffing Cotto's HoF bust while Johnson will be crying more robberies. In an era of 100 titles per weight class, Glen managed to win just 1 of the alphabet titles. You do anything to discredit Cotto. Just give it a rest man. We get it, you hate Cotto...there isn't any reason to keep these pointless threads

Johnson for me and it's not even close. And I don't think either guy should make it to the HOF. Wins over: Tarver Jones Harding Reggie Johnson Montell Griffin Controversial losses to Woods, Dawson, Gonzales, Ottke, and Cloud. Johnson's resume shits on Cotto's. All the titles Johnson won weren't vacant either. Your hate for Puerto Ricans is so obvious:lame:

It's because Johnson is a good guy and peopel want to root for him. He lost the Dawson fight barely, he won the Tarver fight barely. Which one will they mention was a close fight that the other guy should have won? The Dawson one. Cotto barely beat Mosley. Barely beat Clottey. And both of those guys were beaten decisively by Floyd and Pac respectively. Lol.