Marquez clearly won the first Fight

Those 2 fights could have gone either way in my opinion. I give the first to Marquez and the second to Pac, but that's me. If you really think that round two was a draw, then you are a pac hater or blind

WTF?! we got sucked in a debate we already did passionately 6 yrs ago :D Where is the TS in 2004? Did you watched this back in 2004?yan ang sinasabi ko, di pa din sila nagsasawa. :lol1:

This is a little off the subject. However, the Marquez-Diaz fight should draw at least 1 million PPVs when the numbers come out, according to the experts on this site. Why? Because, according to the experts/haters on this site, Marquez was the draw in the Mayweather/Marquez fight, not Floyd. Marquez was the one responsible for those 1.1 million PPV buys in the Mayweather fight. Therefore, the PPV numbers should be huge for this fight since it was so action-packed and had such a good undercard, even without a 24/7 show.

I disagree. I think it was a close Pac win. JMM did a good job coming back. people act like Manny lost every round after the first two, and that's just not the case. The second fight was a lot more difficult to score. I can see JMM getting the nod.

i have scored all rounds after the first one to marquez, except round 2 which was a draw.. pac fans should be more than happy with the result of the first fight. So you are a boxing judge now? LOL:rofl:

nah...... i'm fairly spot on. you just don't know shit. not with this response.. but i'll give u a last chance, prove pac won more than 3 rounds in the first fight, can u?

WTF?! we got sucked in a debate we already did passionately 6 yrs ago :D Where is the TS in 2004? Did you watched this back in 2004?

Sorry man, most rounds werent even kinda close. Pac looked lost after the first round. :( Pacquiao Double what Marquez landed in round 2. Marquez was on the defense and werent actually attempting to counter. He was still dazed. Only a BIAS hater or 79 yr old like Guy Jutras can score this round for Marquez.

u know nothing about boxing or u r simply biased, if u really think pac won more than 1 round after the second one. marquez 9-3, easy! nah...... i'm fairly spot on. you just don't know shit.

if JMM goes up to 140 or 147 i think Pac knocks him out, if Pac goes down to Lightweight than JMM may have a chance. Because Pac will be weight drained if he goes down to 135 again. I never took anything away from pac's wins over Cotto and DLH and made the excuse about catchweight, the problem i have is when than Pac fans make the weight issue when he got knocked out by 3K battery in Thailane due to not making Flyweight. You cant have it both ways. they can, we are in pacland here :D

Sorry man, most rounds werent even kinda close. Pac looked lost after the first round. silly. marquez won a lot of "clear" rounds. but clearly winning rounds doesn't mean it's not close. if someone wants to say he thinks jmm won , fine. if someone wants to say jmm exposed a lot of pacquiao's weaknesses , fine. but to say it was some kind of blowout is just plain silly. jmm "clearly" won a lot of rounds but that doesn't mean it wasn't close rounds.

Marquez put on a clinic. If you actually score rounds then he won the fight. But some people cant score and just say "Pac knocked him down three times...who do you think won?!?" But Juan won more rounds in both fights easily. The first one was pathetic for Pac beyond the first round. He got outboxed badly the rest of the fight. But it doesnt matter now. Juan is slowing down and Pac is still on his game. If they fought today Pac turns out the lights on Juan. But as far as Im concerned, JMM 2 Pac 0. if JMM goes up to 140 or 147 i think Pac knocks him out, if Pac goes down to Lightweight than JMM may have a chance. Because Pac will be weight drained if he goes down to 135 again. I never took anything away from pac's wins over Cotto and DLH and made the excuse about catchweight, the problem i have is when than Pac fans make the weight issue when he got knocked out by 3K battery in Thailane due to not making Flyweight. You cant have it both ways.

i suggest you do that. to say most of those rounds weren't close is just plain ignorant. stupid hun. go stick to watching klitschko fights. they're easy to score. u know nothing about boxing or u r simply biased, if u really think pac won more than 1 round after the second one. marquez 9-3, easy!

i suggest you do that. to say most of those rounds weren't close is just plain ignorant. stupid hun. go stick to watching klitschko fights. they're easy to score. Sorry man, most rounds werent even kinda close. Pac looked lost after the first round.

i scored it pac tko1. :lol1: Nigel Benn TKO1 Iran Barkley !!!

u should watch the fight again without your fanboy glasses, then we can talk again kid. i suggest you do that. to say most of those rounds weren't close is just plain ignorant. stupid hun. go stick to watching klitschko fights. they're easy to score.

Marquez put on a clinic. If you actually score rounds then he won the fight. But some people cant score and just say "Pac knocked him down three times...who do you think won?!?" But Juan won more rounds in both fights easily. The first one was pathetic for Pac beyond the first round. He got outboxed badly the rest of the fight. But it doesnt matter now. Juan is slowing down and Pac is still on his game. If they fought today Pac turns out the lights on Juan. But as far as Im concerned, JMM 2 Pac 0.

yeah they weren't close. :dunce: just stfu. you're making yourself look more and more stupid. u should watch the fight again without your fanboy glasses, then we can talk again kid.

1st to rounds were very clear for Pacquiao Round 3 to 6 were very clear for Marquez Round 7 to 12 were the rounds we should debate on. 1pt for either fighter is good scoring IMO :) i scored it pac tko1. :lol1:

1st to rounds were very clear for Pacquiao Round 3 to 6 were very clear for Marquez Round 7 to 12 were the rounds we should debate on. 1pt for either fighter is good scoring IMO :)