Would you say that Floyd was "old" and had "lost it" at 34 years of age? Or would it be as great a victory if it had happened last year when Floyd was 32?
In fact, what would you chalk it up to if Floyd clearly lost to Manny?
Depends on the fight obviously. You'd have to see it or read about first to form an opinion. But as of today I'd chalk it up to floyd being better since he is the betting favorite.
In other words, I'm biased.
the idiots who say roach is full of shit will start using his quotes saying floyd was past prime
it's not possible an ATG lose in his prime
everyone has an excuse except for those two morons that got hit by a lucky punch (Lewis/Klit)
And if Floyd beat Manny what would you chalk it up to?
Depends on the fight obviously. You'd have to see it or read about first to form an opinion. But as of today I'd chalk it up to floyd being better since he is the betting favorite.
Depends on the fight obviously. You'd have to see it or read about first to form an opinion. But as of today I'd chalk it up to luck.
And if Floyd beat Manny what would you chalk it up to?
Would you say that Floyd was "old" and had "lost it" at 34 years of age? Or would it be as great a victory if it had happened last year when Floyd was 32?
In fact, what would you chalk it up to if Floyd clearly lost to Manny?
Depends on the fight obviously. You'd have to see it or read about first to form an opinion. But as of today I'd chalk it up to luck.