Probably Hatton. He had quick hands and quick feet.
It also helps that Hatton was more of a close range fighter with shorter arms, and his punches travelled less distance than Tito's. Tito was more effective at mid-to-long range.
Ricky Hatton was very fast in his prime, faster than Tito. But Tito would have killed him easily because he has better skills, MUCH MORE power and physical strength.
Trinidad KOs him round 5 at 147.
The thread isnt about who would win if they fought....
Ricky Hatton was very fast in his prime, faster than Tito. But Tito would have killed him easily because he has better skills, MUCH MORE power and physical strength.
Trinidad KOs him round 5 at 147.
also - barack obama is the US president, the seasons are going more extreme and floyd just backed out of another fight w/ pacman.
When you make a list of undeniable facts, its best not to use Bob Arum's lines of bullshit as one of those.
hatton had faster hands, actually hattons foot speed is what was most impressive. Tito wasnt slow... just hatton was faster. Tito was the better p4p fighter though.
also - barack obama is the US president, the seasons are going more extreme and floyd just backed out of another fight w/ pacman.
hatton had faster hands, actually hattons foot speed is what was most impressive. Tito wasnt slow... just hatton was faster. Tito was the better p4p fighter though.
Hatton at 140,faster handspeed than Tito,but in this comparison,it means nothing!!Tito,bigger,stronger & would ko every single person that Hatton ever fought!!Up to & including Floyd!!