Pacfans please make sense of this for me and explain

the fight with manny and cotto almost didn't happen because miguel said that they had all agreed to a catch weight fight that was not goin to be for miguels tittle yet after that manny says he wants to fight for miguels belt so the wbo makes a whole new belt for manny and bob has to pay miguel more money to put his tittle on the line but the main point was that Cotto agreed from the start about the weight.... no real controversy like between Floyd vs Manny

1) Both Manny and Cotto accepted those terms (145 instead of 147 for only Manny's 2nd fight at WW) and neither one, NOT BEFORE NOT AFTER, regretted those terms. Neither one at any moment thought the terms were crazy and heavily tilted to favor the other opponent. More importantly, the fight was made with neither fighter insinuating that the other is cheating. 2) Catch-weights are not new. Floyd vs Marquez had catch-weight too .....Also, Floyd fans are just making it sound like all of Manny's fights have catchweights. Can't be further from the truth. 3) Floyd and company started this on the wrong note. They have stated on many occassions that Manny is probably on PED and that is why he is that good. That is, Floyd ACCUSED Manny of using PEDs with not one shred of evidence. This can be very damaging to Manny's reputation. 4) Doctors have now stated that blood testing for boxers at 14 days and less can be risky. So should we still go for it because Floyd says so? 5) Floyd does not really believe in random drug testing so that's what makes these demands more of a joke. 6) Floyd not accepting 14 days does not make him scared of Manny but just like there is now a question about Manny taking PEDs there is a question about Floyd dodging. See there is a difference. a) Manny has NEVER been tested for PEDs so Floyd fans can only speculate. b) Floyd was supposed to fight other opponents but stepped away from the negotiations. Example, Margo ... So if this fight doesn't happen (Manny vs Floyd) it's just more ammunition. So it doesn't matter who makes the demands...... but will history repeat itself? the fight with manny and cotto almost didn't happen because miguel said that they had all agreed to a catch weight fight that was not goin to be for miguels tittle yet after that manny says he wants to fight for miguels belt so the wbo makes a whole new belt for manny and bob has to pay miguel more money to put his tittle on the line

cotto is just fighter and accepts what the cashcow wants thats all. mayweather is thinks hes the cashcow apparently and pacquiao and the publics knows mayweather aint todays cashcow.. thats all...QUOTE] forbes says otherwise

Im just trolling. =) lol Keep up the good work.

1) Both Manny and Cotto accepted those terms (145 instead of 147 for only Manny's 2nd fight at WW) and neither one, NOT BEFORE NOT AFTER, regretted those terms. Neither one at any moment thought the terms were crazy and heavily tilted to favor the other opponent. More importantly, the fight was made with neither fighter insinuating that the other is cheating. 2) Catch-weights are not new. Floyd vs Marquez had catch-weight too .....Also, Floyd fans are just making it sound like all of Manny's fights have catchweights. Can't be further from the truth. 3) Floyd and company started this on the wrong note. They have stated on many occassions that Manny is probably on PED and that is why he is that good. That is, Floyd ACCUSED Manny of using PEDs with not one shred of evidence. This can be very damaging to Manny's reputation. 4) Doctors have now stated that blood testing for boxers at 14 days and less can be risky. So should we still go for it because Floyd says so? 5) Floyd does not really believe in random drug testing so that's what makes these demands more of a joke. 6) Floyd not accepting 14 days does not make him scared of Manny but just like there is now a question about Manny taking PEDs there is a question about Floyd dodging. See there is a difference. a) Manny has NEVER been tested for PEDs so Floyd fans can only speculate. b) Floyd was supposed to fight other opponents but stepped away from the negotiations. Example, Margo ... So if this fight doesn't happen (Manny vs Floyd) it's just more ammunition. So it doesn't matter who makes the demands...... but will history repeat itself?

lol =) Good stuff. I actually don't endorse the quote at all because it has many presumptions about Pacquiao fans. :)

lol =) Good stuff.

Oh... And D33P..... If you cant handle people ripping on your thinly hidden nutthuggery... Dont dig old sh*t like this out of the dumpster and splash on the board again. "Uh..ummm...just a quick question, dont hate on me it wasnt my idea, i just put the time in to find it, copy it, and repost it...im the simple messenger...aww shucks" Homo. Oh..and dont hate on me..someone else wrote all this...im just curious. http://i50.tinypic.com/23iwihi.jpg

Oh... And D33P..... If you cant handle people ripping on your thinly hidden nutthuggery... Dont dig old sh*t like this out of the dumpster and splash on the board again. "Uh..ummm...just a quick question, dont hate on me it wasnt my idea, i just put the time in to find it, copy it, and repost it...im the simple messenger...aww shucks" Homo. Oh..and dont hate on me..someone else wrote all this...im just curious.

cotto is just fighter and accepts what the cashcow wants thats all. mayweather is thinks hes the cashcow apparently and pacquiao and the publics knows mayweather aint todays cashcow.. thats all...

:lol1: :lol1: you make me laugh.................. Is it due to my helium-induced humor or the juvenile-clichéd and laden statement that you find ambiguous! bwahahahha Well, either way, I won't mind being laughed at or laughing with.....I am laughing, nevertheless. :)

If Pacquiao does some shit like Mayweather did. id be disgusted with him too. this isnt a case of being biased to one fighter and ripping on another. im just a boxing fan, and mayweather has shit on boxing for the majority of his career, then tries to act as if hes the spokesperson for boxing. **** him. and **** B-Hop. How has he defecated on boxing for the majority of his career?

How has he defecated on boxing for the majority of his career?

Did you find any today?If Pacquiao does some shit like Mayweather did. id be disgusted with him too. this isnt a case of being biased to one fighter and ripping on another. im just a boxing fan, and mayweather has shit on boxing for the majority of his career, then tries to act as if hes the spokesperson for boxing. **** him. and **** B-Hop.

ah well, I am perhaps but not with the wines or spirits but with the culinary treat that is the best offering. And oh I like it non-deep fried or it will be too crunchy and non of the meat. (showboating) :) :lol1: :lol1: you make me laugh..................

haha you must be drunk :lol1: jk ah well, I am perhaps but not with the wines or spirits but with the culinary treat that is the best offering. And oh I like it non-deep fried or it will be too crunchy and non of the meat. (showboating) :)

the ones who wanna fight and aint in the habit of ducking fighters in their primes. Did you find any today?

what fighters do you like?the ones who wanna fight and aint in the habit of ducking fighters in their primes.

D33Pwaters-buddy. To me, these are nothing more spices to a good meal. And a "good meal" is a healthy and generous servings of tasty and unadulterated home-cooked pugilism. I love spices but it isn't the main entree'. :) haha you must be drunk :lol1: jk

i dont rly care for either topic. Mayweather is a piece of shit, noone gonna change my mind. i know pac aint innocent, but their life outside boxing really doesnt interest me. what fighters do you like?