Pac and Floyd Last 3yrs of previous fights..

2007 Barrera UD - Past Prime 2008 Marquez SD - Beat Pac 2008 Diaz KO - whatever 2008 DLH TKO - severely weight drained and dehydrated and already beaten by floyd 2009 Hatton KO - already destroyed by floyd 2009 Cotto TKO- already destoryed 2010 Clottey UD - and who did he beat of importance? fail you :owned: TS

In the past 3 yrs we look at both Floyd and Pacman and their level of competition... Floyd 2007 Oscar SD WIN 2007 Hatton KO WIN LATE 2007-Mid 2009 Lay off 2009 Mid Marquez UD 2010 Mosley UD Pacman 2007 Solis KO 2007 Barrera UD 2008 Marquez SD 2008 Diaz KO 2008 DLH TKO 2009 Hatton KO 2009 Cotto TKO 2010 Clottey UD Level of competition in the last 3 yrs Pac has had tough and more challenges in the past 3 yrs alone. This is something to consider when comparing the two.. Pac has been in serious battles compared to Floyd who's won a SD against DLH, KO Hatton in the late rounds before being pressured, took about a 2 year layoff, fought a smaller fighter in Marquez (really no competition there), and fought a Shane Mosely who didnt really do much after the 2rd.. Its all about level of competition and Pac has had some serious competition in the past 3 yrs alone.. clottey was a world beater and, i think we can all agree pacquiao fought tougher versions of delahoya and hatton...

Based on their records, Pacman has the higher percentage of KO/TKO than Floyd jr. who posted a single KO against Hatton. I'm still hoping that Floyd will finally agree to fight, its his chance to prove that BWWA was wrong in the selection of Pacman as "The Fighter of the Decade" lol! Floyd beating Pac in 2010 won't change the fact he was FOTD between year 2000-2009. Pac already proved he is the better man overall if you compare their resume and accomplishments.Flomos claimed Floyd beat Pac and better based on his skill but for us to believe it he should fight Pac first and beat him. Many times we saw boxers with superior skill may not win you the fight alone. Pac proved and fought many good/great fighters thought to be too much for him based on their skill (which is true but somehow Pac always prevailed) like his fights against Sasakul, Ledwaba, Barerra and Marquez.

Based on their records, Pacman has the higher percentage of KO/TKO than Floyd jr. who posted a single KO against Hatton. I'm still hoping that Floyd will finally agree to fight, its his chance to prove that BWWA was wrong in the selection of Pacman as "The Fighter of the Decade"

this is why Floyd loses the historical ranking discussion not just the last 3 years, but overall Pac simply has put in better work resume wise don't make Pac better head to head that only can be settled in the ring but Floyd can't take over Pac's res even if he beat him

The diffrerence is that Floyd aint eating no balut but Manny will.

I'm not sure about Floyd fighting quality opponent especially the last two. I mean c'mon Marquez is a quality opponent if he's at 135, he was clearly bloated in that fight. Mosley was on a year and a half layoff plus he's getting old, that's why he gassed out early. And for Hatton, it was at 147 and Hatton is at best in 140. The only commendable opponent is ODLH. So Hatton, Marquez, and Mosley were all ranked in the top 10 P4P because they suck? Fighting at 147 instead of 140 shouldn't be an excuse for Hatton, he was a titlist at that weight and he is bigger than Floyd anyways. Marquez was a smaller man, but he was also #2 P4P and had arguably beaten Pacquiao 18 months before the Mayweather fight. There have been many cases where a great smaller fighter has moved up a couple divisions and defeated a strong opponent. I thought it was very impressive that Floyd was able to win so convincingly. It is still a good win for Mayweather. Mosley was the consensus #3 P4P. Even though he was aging and had a long layoff, many people picked him to beat Floyd and considered him the most dangerous possible opponent for Floyd except for Pacquiao. Roach said he was too dangerous for Pacquiao to fight, and Arum said that he thought Floyd would be too scared to fight Mosley.

own me? the point is idiotic poster yesir said pac fought destroyed, fighters beaten fighters... as if floyd fought all of his fight undefeated fighters... hahahahha lol Awe aight I thought you were trying to make out that that floyd not fighting many undefeated invalidated his wins or something.

This is really not even that big a deal but i feel the need to own you... how many undefeated Champs has Pac beat? I know the answer already btw before looking it up. own me? the point is idiotic poster yesir said pac fought destroyed, fighters beaten fighters... as if floyd fought all of his fight undefeated fighters... hahahahha

did floyd beat the hell out of them???? This is really not even that big a deal but i feel the need to own you... how many undefeated Champs has Pac beat? I know the answer already btw before looking it up.

Beaten and destroyed are 2 different things. U get knocked out head hit the buckle and lets see what state your brain is in. Better yet get beat in the fast with plasters for 11 rounds straight and lets see how u bounce back. THeres a difference in losing and getting beat the **** down. Hatton and cotto got beat the **** down.. did floyd beat the hell out of them????

Corrales and Hatton were undefeated... oh theres two of them hahahahah

idiot did all floyd fought undefeated boxers? meaning all of floyds previous fights are all beated.. OWNED!! Beaten and destroyed are 2 different things. U get knocked out head hit the buckle and lets see what state your brain is in. Better yet get beat in the fast with plasters for 11 rounds straight and lets see how u bounce back. THeres a difference in losing and getting beat the **** down. Hatton and cotto got beat the **** down..

idiot did all floyd fought undefeated boxers? meaning all of floyds previous fights are all beated.. OWNED!! Corrales and Hatton were undefeated...

I don't really see how you come to the conclusion that Pac's level of opposition is higher. Pacquiao has fought more fights than Mayweather, but Mayweather's average level of opposition is higher. He fought better versions of Oscar and Hatton than Pacquiao did (although Pacquiao fought a better version of Marquez), and Mosley was rated higher than Cotto or Clottey. It's not like Solis, Diaz, or past-prime coming-off-a-loss Barrera were particularly dangerous opponents either. Pacquiao = more fights Mayweather = less fights, but those fights are against quality opponents I'm not sure about Floyd fighting quality opponent especially the last two. I mean c'mon Marquez is a quality opponent if he's at 135, he was clearly bloated in that fight. Mosley was on a year and a half layoff plus he's getting old, that's why he gassed out early. And for Hatton, it was at 147 and Hatton is at best in 140. The only commendable opponent is ODLH.

Previous fights dont matter. You cant use the triangle theory in boxing because "styles make fights". The only thing that matters is that both these mother****ers sign on the dotted line and throwdown on Nov 13th so we can stop all this damn bickering and 1 upping each other. I agree with this guy. Would give green K but got redded to the max by a guy you guys might remember lol Pacboy.

Previous fights dont matter. You cant use the triangle theory in boxing because "styles make fights". The only thing that matters is that both these mother****ers sign on the dotted line and throwdown on Nov 13th so we can stop all this damn bickering and 1 upping each other. Yes sir. I'm a fan of Mayweather but a bigger fan of boxing. It gets annoying hearing people come up with any way possible to argue that their fighter is better than the other. Hopefully we find out in November and there will be no excuses.

Previous fights dont matter. You cant use the triangle theory in boxing because "styles make fights". The only thing that matters is that both these mother****ers sign on the dotted line and throwdown on Nov 13th so we can stop all this damn bickering and 1 upping each other.[/QUOTE. X100000 it will be settled in the ring

2007 Barrera UD - Past Prime 2008 Marquez SD - Beat Pac 2008 Diaz KO - whatever 2008 DLH TKO - severely weight drained and dehydrated and already beaten by floyd 2009 Hatton KO - already destroyed by floyd 2009 Cotto TKO- already destoryed 2010 Clottey UD - and who did he beat of importance? fail idiot did all floyd fought undefeated boxers? meaning all of floyds previous fights are all beated.. OWNED!!

In the past 3 yrs we look at both Floyd and Pacman and their level of competition... Floyd 2007 Oscar SD WIN 2007 Hatton KO WIN LATE 2007-Mid 2009 Lay off 2009 Mid Marquez UD 2010 Mosley UD Pacman 2007 Solis KO 2007 Barrera UD 2008 Marquez SD 2008 Diaz KO 2008 DLH TKO 2009 Hatton KO 2009 Cotto TKO 2010 Clottey UD Level of competition in the last 3 yrs Pac has had tough and more challenges in the past 3 yrs alone. This is something to consider when comparing the two.. Pac has been in serious battles compared to Floyd who's won a SD against DLH, KO Hatton in the late rounds before being pressured, took about a 2 year layoff, fought a smaller fighter in Marquez (really no competition there), and fought a Shane Mosely who didnt really do much after the 2rd.. Its all about level of competition and Pac has had some serious competition in the past 3 yrs alone.. I don't really see how you come to the conclusion that Pac's level of opposition is higher. Pacquiao has fought more fights than Mayweather, but Mayweather's average level of opposition is higher. He fought better versions of Oscar and Hatton than Pacquiao did (although Pacquiao fought a better version of Marquez), and Mosley was rated higher than Cotto or Clottey. It's not like Solis, Diaz, or past-prime coming-off-a-loss Barrera were particularly dangerous opponents either. Pacquiao = more fights Mayweather = less fights, but those fights are against quality opponents