Link: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-42747-Fort-Smith-Boxing-Examiner~y2010m6d11-Boxing-historian-Mike-Silver-labels-MayweatherPacquiao-the-most-important-fight-in-20-years
"I don't understand it. I mean, in the old days this fight would have been made in a matter of minutes," Silver said. "The managers would have grabbed the fighters by the scruff of the neck and said, 'Are you out of your mind? Sign the contract!' But this is one fight that is not sure he can win so I guess he has doubts. Maybe it's not worth it to him."
The thing that gets me about these guys is they don't criticise past fighters at all...........i mean if you know the history of this sport (as good as he was and he is the GOAT) SRR acted like more of a petulant child in negotaitions than Manny and Floyd combined...........
these "historians" have short memories.........look at Sugar's pre fight and then post fight analysis of JMM vs PBF.........it's ying and yang, a complete 180.......his ego won't allow him to just admit he got it wrong.......in my view he is no longer relevant.....he is a pompous old fool.........one minute he is saying Pac and Floyd aren't even top 100 ATG....and next time he is asked Pac is in the top 10???? :nonono:
wtf could he have possibly done in that timeframe to leapfrog 90 spots in his mind?????
............senile old fool!!!
i live in vegas. right now at the station casinos the odds favor pacquiao winning without blood tests and mayweather winning easy with blood tests. im not shitting i think its ****ing funny.
Oh lol.
Which casinos would take such a bet? Examples?
wtf are you talking about?
didn't i say they have floyd as a slight favorite?
i just stated why i think that is.
they feel the betting public favors floyd slightly.
what part of what i stated "don't work that way"?
they set the line as to get as much bets on both sides as possible.
that's why when one side gets more money on them than the other , the lines move.
Do you understand the difference between a pro sportsbettor and a sportsbook?
Sportsbettors dont set any lines.
i live in vegas. right now at the station casinos the odds favor pacquiao winning without blood tests and mayweather winning easy with blood tests. im not shitting i think its ****ing funny.
wtf????? :lol1:
It dont work this way. If a line is off, the professional sportsbettors will correct it.
No one hates free money.
wtf are you talking about?
didn't i say they have floyd as a slight favorite?
i just stated why i think that is.
they feel the betting public favors floyd slightly.
what part of what i stated "don't work that way"?
they set the line as to get as much bets on both sides as possible.
that's why when one side gets more money on them than the other , the lines move.
vegas odds is all about getting action.
they feel a slight majority of the casual boxing public would bet mayweather. they're probably right.
It dont work this way. If a line is off, the professional sportsbettors will correct it.
No one hates free money.
the historians make mistakes vegas does not. vegas odds favor a mayweather decsion victory...
vegas odds is all about getting action.
they feel a slight majority of the casual boxing public would bet mayweather. they're probably right.
Bottom line, this fight would of happened if Floyd did not call for excessive blood testing demands that he does not have authority over.
If the NSAC demanded them then this fight would of happened, but since Floyd through in this road block we are not going to see the fight..
But honestly, this fight aint happening since floyd only fights once a year now FACT..
Same damn story! pbf is scared of this and that fighter until he beats them. then so what. that fighter was suppose to lose.
mate , the only fighters floyd fought that people accused him of ducking before was mosley (and to a small extent hatton)
This guy's opinion isnt as valid as most posters on here.
Im sorry, but it should be clear to all of us that he is a bitter
old man who is stuck in his own time.
He said in the 20 years no one has made it into his all-time list.
WTF???
Not Hops, Jones, Toney, Whitaker, Floyd, Pac, Holyfield...
Please stop posting this guy's opinion.
Oh, and its a good thing that the days of athletes being treated like slaves are over. Guess he missed that memo.
no kidding boxers today are slicker and have more power, I wonder if the fighters of yesterday could compete today. The reason I ask this is because Leila Ali said the older version of Ali (post 2 year suspension) could not have competed because his legs were not the same and the rope a dope would be dangerous.
Neither of them are sure, that's why the fight hasnt been made yet.
If Floyd really wanted it, he would have signed. If Manny really wanted it, he would have agreed to the tests. Their egos have kept this fight from being made long enough, Let's fookin' 'ave it.
I agree with you, can you imagine the press conference once people see these guys standing next to each other alot of opinion will change b/c especially in the begining Floyds probably around 160 right now. 2 me Floyd looked bigger than Shane in the ring
most of these article writers never boxed in their life and know nothing about the sport everyone is entitled to their opinions but i hope their give credit when floyd beats manny and not make up excuses
You are interpreting this wrong!!!
It's not that Floyd will or will not win. It's that with Manny, these historians are saying, the odds are not as stacked as with let's say a Marquez or a Baldomir. With guys like that, Floyd signs the contract with his eyes closed..... but these historians are saying this is why there are all these delays.
So it's possible that Floyd can still win but Manny has enough of a chance that Floyd is not sure about the win and keeping his ZERO in tact .......
This guy's opinion isnt as valid as most posters on here.
Im sorry, but it should be clear to all of us that he is a bitter
old man who is stuck in his own time.
He said in the 20 years no one has made it into his all-time list.
WTF???
Not Hops, Jones, Toney, Whitaker, Floyd, Pac, Holyfield...
Please stop posting this guy's opinion.
Oh, and its a good thing that the days of athletes being treated like slaves are over. Guess he missed that memo.
I remember when boxing historian Bert Sugar said that Marquez vs. Mayweather was 50/50 and a fight he liked very much. . .
days after the fight, you see Bert Sugar discrediting the win,
and saying he cherry picked the fight.
:dunno:
i just don't understand the logic in that.
pasa once again you all keep saying floyd is scared , then when he takes care of business in the ring there is always reason for it AKA excuses. Mosley went from the most dangerous fighter in the WW division who mayweather was ducking to an old shot 38 year old that never had a chance. Like I have already seen if pac loses all you pac followers will say because he either got blood drained or is a congressman so he couldnt focus fully on a fight paying him 40M dollars against a guy he hates...LOL
didnt it ever occur to you..............that i just dont trust/like you enough........to bet with you.....................LOL..............fukin stalker:bottle:
If you're going to use multiple accounts, you might want to change your writing style between them so that it's not so damn obvious.
15y ago
Boxing historian Mike Silver says Mayweather ain't sure | BoxingScene Community