Chad Dawson is the best technical fighter outside of Mayweather, agree?

I would say Timothy Bradley but as you said, Bradley tends to go crazy at times.

Steve Molitor

top three.. honestly. Guzman has so much skill but he is lazy, and his stamina and unwillingness to train year around hurts him.. on pure boxing ability i gotta give it to lazy guzman.. but chad is prob 3rd.. most ppl will disagree

Nope. Calderon is!!!!!

He's definitelys skilled. I don't think he's as crafty and slick as Martinez though.

he beats Pascal he is the new #1 P4P IMO, he is basically DOMINATING his division and would have fought just about everyone and beat every top contender in his division other then Hopkins who is not interested in fight Dawson and rightfully so his win over Adamek is looking even more impressive now reason why I would leapfrog him over Manny and Mayweather? because Manny and Mayweather need to fight each other to officially be crowd #1 P4P, right now fans and "Writers/So Called Experts" are ALL just assuming what would happen if they was to fight or if Manny was to fight Mosley or Berto or Williams or Margarito, or if Mayweather was to fight Cotto and Margarito and Paul Williams, we don't know for sure because they haven't fought each other in Dawson's division again if he beats Pascal it is really nothing left for him in that division, either he moves up and join that rumored Cruiserweight Tournament or maybe he moves down and go after Lucian Bute or wait for the winner of the Super Six I don't hear Dawson using "Money" as an excuse for not fighting someone, he doesn't use CATCH WEIGHTS to drain his opponent, I don't hear Dawson talking about PPV numbers as the reason why not to fight someone and I don't see him hiding behind his promoter, you never hear Dawson say "well it is up to my promoters", he is willing to fight any and EVERYONE! That is what a P4P King is suppose to be like

Pac isn't a good technical boxer just becasue he knock people the fuk out? Oh I'm sorry a good technical fighter has to have a hip hop fighting style with shoulder rolls and his hands have to be hanging down to his waste. Fuk Felix Sturm is pretty God Damn technical boxer if you ask me. We never said Pac is a good technical fighter, we're just asking who's the BEST. And Chad Dawson doesn't leave both his hands at his waste and neither does he use the shoulder roll.

Pac isn't a good technical boxer just becasue he knock people the fuk out? Oh I'm sorry a good technical fighter has to have a hip hop fighting style with shoulder rolls and his hands have to be hanging down to his waste. Fuk Felix Sturm is pretty God Damn technical boxer if you ask me.

Chad Dawson's technical skills are 2nd to none to Floyd Mayweather's technical skills. One of the best Pure All-Around boxers in boxing today. And he's unique in the fact that he's a right handed south paw so his hooks to the body and his jab will have more pop to it.

I would say, he's neck to neck with Floyd in terms of pure all-around skills..

i would give that to vitali. he never loses ANY rounds and his compubox stats are second to floyd. \third is wladimir, who also never loses a round anymore Read the TS's statement again.

i would give that to vitali. he never loses ANY rounds and his compubox stats are second to floyd. \third is wladimir, who also never loses a round anymore

Felix Sturm is worthy to be mentioned.

Easily the best technical fighter aside from Floyd.

Offensively yes...but defensively no. He gets dropped too much.But I am a fan and I think he should be on the pound for pound list too. What is being dropped "too much"? I remember he was dropped once against Harding and I forgot if Adamek dropped him but if he did then just twice. Why is being dropped twice "too much"?

Yes he is.

Offensively yes...but defensively no. He gets dropped too much.But I am a fan and I think he should be on the pound for pound list too.