Will pacquiao 7 weight division championship belt ever be broke?

Manny will win 8.

He won the lineal champ at 140. 7 titles, 7 weight-classes. people are forgetting that's where the 7 comes from, combining both Alphabet and Lineal titles, no one has ever done that and manny can possibly break it himself, now that pbf may be taking time off again... manny may take the challenge for the 8 and anyone of the 154 champs would give him that more so if cotto wins ...

It can be done, but it will take certain conditions. The one who would do it would also have to turn pro young, so he can grow into most of the above weight classes naturally and still be talented enough to step above his weight limits a couple classes. It will not be easy, but there will always be some who will go for it.

I may be wrong but manny is not a true 7 division champion.and no im not saying cause of the wbo belt.i actually count the wbo title but the won he won at 140 was an ibo.so technically he is a 6 division champ just like oscar delahoya who was a 10 time 6 division champion and beat a total of 17 ex champs including chavez,quartey,vargas,ruelas,molina,camacho,and genaro hernandez.and the fights he should have one like the second mosley fight.and then again did oscar really beat felix sturm to win the 160 title.and i love manny but dont make it seem like he has the greatest accomplishment in boxing history. He won the lineal champ at 140. 7 titles, 7 weight-classes.

I may be wrong but manny is not a true 7 division champion.and no im not saying cause of the wbo belt.i actually count the wbo title but the won he won at 140 was an ibo.so technically he is a 6 division champ just like oscar delahoya who was a 10 time 6 division champion and beat a total of 17 ex champs including chavez,quartey,vargas,ruelas,molina,camacho,and genaro hernandez.and the fights he should have one like the second mosley fight.and then again did oscar really beat felix sturm to win the 160 title.and i love manny but dont make it seem like he has the greatest accomplishment in boxing history.

what has Malignaggi done since? Beat Juan Diaz? I don't know. I am not a Malignaggi fan either. So I am not here acting like he was great. I know at the time though when he fought Hatton he was in the top 10. I know he is still in the top 10 in what many consider a loaded division. I know he was a champ at the time he fought Hatton and got stripped from his title cuz he fought Hatton. I mean to not give Hatton any credit for that. To me sounds bush league and really nitpicking. But, I could do that to ever single fighter as well. No matter how great they're. i could nitpick their career. But, since it had more to do with Malignaggi then Hatton. Then I guess Malignaggi at the time was more ruined or shot than Hatton was. But, oh well to each is own.

Oh that is what it is. It said more about Malignaggi then Hatton. OK... what has Malignaggi done since?

We could try Sergio Martinez, for the 9th.... 8th would be attainable, Cotto Rematch I agree about the 8th belt but pac getting the 9 division belt is very unlikely, he's already small in 147, if he will fight at 160 he will be outweigh by 20-30 lbs by his opponent.

is pacquiao ever fought a prime great fighter? HOW MANY TIMES DID HE WON the wbc wich is teh officil belt did he ever unifed a the titles in a weight class? Basically they were moving up and catching a fighter in a weight class who had a belt but was simply out of their prime and quickly move up before a young fighter challenge them did i forget to say he did all this using ped's He beat Barrera who was a prime great fighter. And, what makes the We Be Crooks... Excuse me, I mean the WBC the official belt? So pac has been the only fight "using" PED's now also? Because, if PED's can have you winning 7 titles in 7 divisions. And, since nobody has done it. I guess Pac is the only fighter that is on PED's

is pacquiao ever fought a prime great fighter? HOW MANY TIMES DID HE WON the wbc wich is teh officil belt did he ever unifed a the titles in a weight class? Basically they were moving up and catching a fighter in a weight class who had a belt but was simply out of their prime and quickly move up before a young fighter challenge them did i forget to say he did all this using ped's Whatever u think bro, it was all your opinion and no one can take that away from you. Pacquiao is the only recognize 7 weight division champ and 4 lineal champ and no one can't deny that except maybe u and the flomos......

in the history of boxing only pacquiao become the 7 weight division champion, plenty of people here in this forum said that belts are so easy to collect, since it was so easy to collect is there any chance that someone in 10-100 years can broke pac's accomplishments or i just say pac's 7 weight division champion since pac's accomplishments is impossible to broke. 7 weight division champion 4 lineal champion 3x fighter of the year fighter of the decade sorry flomos i need to tell the truth.... :439: is pacquiao ever fought a prime great fighter? HOW MANY TIMES DID HE WON the wbc wich is teh officil belt did he ever unifed a the titles in a weight class? Basically they were moving up and catching a fighter in a weight class who had a belt but was simply out of their prime and quickly move up before a young fighter challenge them did i forget to say he did all this using ped's

We could try Sergio Martinez, for the 9th.... 8th would be attainable, Cotto Rematch It would be suicide to fight Martinez.

says more about Malignaggi losing then Hatton winning really. Hatton was done he was just cashing out basically did not have another fight after losing to pac Oh that is what it is. It said more about Malignaggi then Hatton. OK...

We could try Sergio Martinez, for the 9th.... 8th would be attainable, Cotto Rematch

probably not i reckon the divisions will get smaller in the future so someone should do it in the next 10 if its ever going to be broken

He won 10 rounds against Lazcano. And, right after Lazcano, you know the fight prior to Pac. He stopped a top 10 JWW in Malignaggi. By all accounts Malignaggi is better than Lazcano right? So if you just as good as your last fight. Well then before pac he stopped a top 10 fighter. Bradley stopped a fighter who wasn't even ranked. So since the facts has been dealt out can you please answer my question. When Pac signed to fight Hatton. How was Bradley the best fighter in the division? And, keep and mind when Pac-Hatton had been signed. Bradley still had not beaten Kendall Holt. says more about Malignaggi losing then Hatton winning really. Hatton was done he was just cashing out basically did not have another fight after losing to pac

you judge a fighter by how they look in there most recent fights and Hatton was looking like a ruined fighter after getting rocked by lazcano he was no where near the best even at a weak division He won 10 rounds against Lazcano. And, right after Lazcano, you know the fight prior to Pac. He stopped a top 10 JWW in Malignaggi. By all accounts Malignaggi is better than Lazcano right? So if you just as good as your last fight. Well then before pac he stopped a top 10 fighter. Bradley stopped a fighter who wasn't even ranked. So since the facts has been dealt out can you please answer my question. When Pac signed to fight Hatton. How was Bradley the best fighter in the division? And, keep and mind when Pac-Hatton had been signed. Bradley still had not beaten Kendall Holt.

He unified the titles against Maussa, he also beat Urango who later became champ, he stopped Malignaggi, and won the lineal title for beat Tszyu. And, you saying that he fought nobodies? All this fighters were in the top 10 at 140. And he fought nobodies? And, again when Pac signed to fight Hatton. How was Hatton not the best fighter at 140? At the time the fight was signed Bradley hadn't even beaten Holt. Hatton was coming off 2 wins against the champ Witter in Witter homeland and Edner Cherry. Cherry wasn't even ranked at 140 at the time. So how could you have said that at that time Bradley was better than Hatton? you judge a fighter by how they look in there most recent fights and Hatton was looking like a ruined fighter after getting rocked by lazcano he was no where near the best even at a weak division

Hatton fought nobodies so yeah he wasn't beat at 140 but whatever I know Manny had a questionable title fight win at 130 and didn't fight the best at 135 140 and 147 thats why I'm not that big on what he did the last 3 years He unified the titles against Maussa, he also beat Urango who later became champ, he stopped Malignaggi, and won the lineal title for beat Tszyu. And, you saying that he fought nobodies? All this fighters were in the top 10 at 140. And he fought nobodies? And, again when Pac signed to fight Hatton. How was Hatton not the best fighter at 140? At the time the fight was signed Bradley hadn't even beaten Holt. Hatton was coming off 2 wins against the champ Witter in Witter homeland and Edner Cherry. Cherry wasn't even ranked at 140 at the time. So how could you have said that at that time Bradley was better than Hatton?

I don't know if it was a paper belt or not, but what i know is that hatton is the man and recognize lineal champ at 140 lbs...... Whether you think he cherry pick the tittle that's your opinion but pac has shown that he is willing to fight anyone they put in front of him and he prove it by facing barrera, marquez and morales.......... I don't if he is the man or not in those 7 weight class all i know is that he's the 4 lineal champ out of those 7.... Hatton fought nobodies so yeah he wasn't beat at 140 but whatever I know Manny had a questionable title fight win at 130 and didn't fight the best at 135 140 and 147 thats why I'm not that big on what he did the last 3 years