Why have the 2 last decade winners been either on steriods or accused?

Why have the 2 last decade winners been either on steriods or accused? Because, colonial mentality is out, crab mentality is in.

im still wondering Why have the 2 last decade winners been either on steriods or accused? are u seriously asking that question? if yes then i might just have met another one with a two digit IQ. if you are at the top, u will have haters that spout bullshit and baseless accusations. happens everywhere in sports.

As if Roy Jones was ever caught taking steroids. 1. He took ripped fuel, which was legal at that time 2. His opponents test was 2 times higher 3. He stopped taking it, after it wasn't legal anymore, elsewise he would've been caught.

im still wondering Why have the 2 last decade winners been either on steriods or accused?

Other boxers have fans too. These fans are so butthurt about their idol not being voted the decade's best or when a boxer has more different excuses than numbers in a phone book im scared of needles, it will weaken me, floyd is not the comission, etc etc.

exactly! The poster child for testicular cancer allegedly cheated also.He took time off when it got hot then came back les than he did when he was dominating. Kind of odd dont you think? No one is above suspicion. Not really. Considering they tested him a ton while he was active and he didn't fail a test except for the one supposed test way back which he was cleared of for tampering or something like that...Lance was how old when he retired? Age: 34 And how long was he inactive? about 3-4 years And how old was he when he came back? 37+ Inactivity kills in most sports, especially endurance sports. Add Lance's age which isn't "fresh" in a sport like that, and do you really expect him to be back at #1? And let's not act like he got killed when he came back. He placed #3 at the Tour De France, which was the only tournament he was truly preparing for. The rest were just to warm up his body to peak for the Tour. Now could he have been on PEDs? YES.. Especially given the field is said to be mostly on them in a sport where "endurance" is a key attribute and you can use PEDs to help you with that. Plus the Doctor he was using at the time was said to be suspicious. So what is the end talk? They are ALL Suspect in today's era...even if they are proven "clean" in tests. It's just the way it is in an era where athletes can stay ahead of the testers. Not fair but that's really the way it is.

rumors does'nt count.... anywhere. Indeed that grapes is sour.. :banana:

There isn't a shred of evidence to link Pacquiao to PED's. Being "accused" doesn't count when it is based on nothing.

Well Roy Jones did test positive for a banned substance for the Richard Hall fight in 2000. He said it was from Ripped Fuel. Who knows really. And you can go back to the 1980s too. Sugar Ray Leonard was accused by Tommy Hearns & Manny Steward of being on steroids. It's fukking pro sports at the highest level. Wouldn't surprise me of all of them used PEDs, as well as many of the other guys around them as well. exactly! The poster child for testicular cancer allegedly cheated also.He took time off when it got hot then came back les than he did when he was dominating. Kind of odd dont you think? No one is above suspicion.

Well Roy Jones did test positive for a banned substance for the Richard Hall fight in 2000. He said it was from Ripped Fuel. Who knows really. And you can go back to the 1980s too. Sugar Ray Leonard was accused by Tommy Hearns & Manny Steward of being on steroids. It's fukking pro sports at the highest level. Wouldn't surprise me of all 3 of them used PEDs, as well as many of the other guys around them as well.

You forgot Holyfield.

success breeds envy/jealousy.. i love ti also, but its proof about the 2 fighter im talking bout

success breeds envy/jealousy..

but aint it a shame that the last two decade winner are involed with steriods?? Yes it is a shame. Pacquiao hasn't been proven of steroids but refusing to prove your legitimacy is just as bad.

Because they are the greatest in their decade. i love roy jones, but if he was so great mostly due to steriods then no he was the greastest of his decade, the steriods were but aint it a shame that the last two decade winner are involed with steriods??

becuz its the only way to turn down a great boxer.. tarnish his reputation cuz of pussyness and jealousy...

Other boxers have fans too. These fans are so butthurt about their idol not being voted the decade's best

Because they are the greatest in their decade.

And only one got caught, crazy