Freddie Roach responds to Joel Diaz. "Timothy Bradley would whip Pacquiao and Khan"

Again arguing from silence is not very strong which is exactly what you are doing. How am i arguing my point to video? :rofl::rofl:I am directly arguing with you. again you have to show me STATMENTS made AFTER the malignaggi fight in which roach shows lacking in CONFIDENCE. This thread means nothing until you do that. :rofl: Really if a video clearly telling Roach what Diaz stated that "Timothy Bradley can beat Pac and Khan. Roach did not comment on Khan, but only on Pac...It's obvious he dodged it..Roach has no confident in Khan against a Timothy Bradley Bradley is nothing special at all. Khan could beat him. It's dumb comments like this, that holds no weight....

Gotta love how he slipped in Salita name in between Khan and Pacquiao there :lol1: Lol yeah what was that about? Roach is an attention whore.... Roach isnt the 1 making the Ridiculous statements

If Bradley beat Alexander he would be able to talk about huge match-ups like that. Instead, he's fighting Abregu which gets him nothing if he wins.

I'm only stating what the video showed, if u wanna argue your point to video, go right ahead. :rofl: Roach could of atleast defended khan, but he was quick to defend Pac... Again arguing from silence is not very strong which is exactly what you are doing. How am i arguing my point to video? :rofl::rofl:I am directly arguing with you. again you have to show me STATMENTS made AFTER the malignaggi fight in which roach shows lacking in CONFIDENCE. This thread means nothing until you do that.

lol, Where did I say that you said this? Again I think you need to go back and read my post about the post fight interview of khan malignaggi. You said: "His own trainer couldn''t comment on that...." - how does this prove that his trainer isn't confident when after the khan malignaggi fight, roach said that he would have NO PROBLEM in Khan taking on all of the belt holders? You are using the fact of roach not speaking about khan, as an argument from silence. In this case it is a very poor argument. I'm only stating what the video showed, if u wanna argue your point to video, go right ahead. :rofl: Roach could of atleast defended khan, but he was quick to defend Pac...

I doubt Khan would be earning more than Bradley if Golden-boy didnt think he could beat Bradley. If Ortiz had boxed Maidana instead of getting into a brawl he would be Golden-Boys Golden boy, But that title has now been given to Khan. I hate to say it but I think De La Hoya has almost given up on Ortiz. u might be right on ortiz, but don't sleep on that boi, he just got careless in that fight...I still think he is a threat to anybody at 140, not saying he wins, but he has the components to win. As far as Bradley, Diaz is just hyping his guy up, nothing wrong with that, they all do it, but Bradley's people should be concerned about Alexander right now, I hate seeing them turn the other cheek every time Devon's name comes up.

Bradley has problems with both IMO, I'm not a fan of any of these guys but have seen them enough to know that while Bradley could outbox either, he just doesn't seem to have enough pop to KO even Khan to me and I wonder if Khan is faster now as well. With Pac I just don't see Bradley being able to be busy enough or have enough power to hurt him. I think Bradley could avoid a KO and stay in the fight but his lack of power would really make it hard for me to believe he could win or whip Pac easy.

WTF?? when did i say this? :rofl: lol, Where did I say that you said this? Again I think you need to go back and read my post about the post fight interview of khan malignaggi. You said: "His own trainer couldn''t comment on that...." - how does this prove that his trainer isn't confident when after the khan malignaggi fight, roach said that he would have NO PROBLEM in Khan taking on all of the belt holders? You are using the fact of roach not speaking about khan, as an argument from silence. In this case it is a very poor argument.

Bradley is a fighter, good fighter. Manny is on another level though, that ATG level. Khan and Bradley would be a good fight. I want to see Bradley/Alexander/Khan/Maidana/Ortiz get it on already.

lol two paragraphs and a video? Are you serious. Show me where Roach admitted that Bradley would beat Khan AFTER the malignaggi fight. Go on boy. WTF?? when did i say this? :rofl:

Look, you can talk all the star potential and talent all you want, but he will continue to be criticised and eatin up my the media unless he fights the top guys at 140..Bradley has already earned his no.1 spot at 140 and is trying hard to get the money he deserves...Cash cow or not is still doesn't prove the best fighter in the division In the interview that took place on Tuesday’s edition of Fight-Fan-Nation-Radio, Camponovo said that Freddie Roach even thinks that a fight with Bradley is just too risky of proposition at this stage of his career and Camponovo stated, “I talked to Freddie Roach a while back ago about the possibility of doing Amir Khan and Timothy or Pacquiao and he told me literally, ‘What for? Your kid is too good, that’s a fight we can do down the line,’ so they know of him and I’m not going to say they are avoiding him, but it probably has to make a little more sense economically and there will be a time when we are going to see showdown between Timothy and one of those guys.”

Pacquiao would kill Bradley knock him out horrendously.

:rofl: You being MAD is even funnier...LOL.. A bullshit thread? Ain't nothing different on the thread than the actual article,,,click the link idiot.... :rofl: http://boxing.fanhouse.com/2010/06/01/trainer-freddie-roach-answers-joel-diaz/ lol two paragraphs and a video? Are you serious. Show me where Roach admitted that Bradley would beat Khan AFTER the malignaggi fight. Go on boy.

Gotta love how he slipped in Salita name in between Khan and Pacquiao there :lol1: :lol1: I was just about to type that, when I heard his name, I was like :haha:

bradley would get hatton-fied by pac. khan would run circles round him with his reach.

Pac would stop bradley.........but bradley would beat khan...

Being silent does not mean a silent approval. Also it's funny how you made a bullshit thread title, just to draw users into your thread. Roach already said in the post fight interview that he was ready to take all of them on. He is obviously confident of khan beating bradley, otherwise why would he make such a statement? go and work for a weak ass tabloid newspaper. Khan would rape bradley and throw him into the "palm springs" :rofl: You being MAD is even funnier...LOL.. A bullshit thread? Ain't nothing different on the thread than the actual article,,,click the link idiot.... :rofl: http://boxing.fanhouse.com/2010/06/01/trainer-freddie-roach-answers-joel-diaz/

So your theory is that the fighter who makes more money is the best fighter in the division..You really don't know boxing, do you? Bradley is more accomplished, but Khan has more talent and star potential. Whether you like it or not, khan is the cash cow @ 140 and timidly bradley can do nothing about it, but dream of a payday.

Diaz was just trying to get a name for himself and a payday for Bradley. Even Bradley himself said that the cash cow @140lbs is Khan, Khan earns more than Bradley and Alexander combined. Here straight from the horses mouth: "But the most money is Khan. I would take Khan in a heartbeat" http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=28190 If Bradley is the best in the division then why is he earning less than Khan? The best boxer at 140lbs is Manny Pacman. No doubt about that. So your theory is that the fighter who makes more money is the best fighter in the division..You really don't know boxing, do you?

Bradley could very possibly hold his own with Pac at 140, but its going to come down to Bradley not being able to match Pacquiaos power.