Why didn't PAC had a 24/7 to begin with??! because it's the same BS over and over...nobody wanted to see it..
BRAVO!!! RIGHT ON!!! EXACTAMUNDO!!!!! As if it's Floyd's fault that Pac lacks personality.
pactards be honest look at the stats as numbers don't lie if u was mayweather would u not ask for a bigger split or if u was pacquiao and had floyd's ppv numbers wouldn't u ask for a bigger split? remember mosley, hatton, de la hoya and marquez highest ppv buys have been with floyd mayweather
mayweather vs de la hoya 2.4million pacquiao vs de la hoya 1.25million
mayweather vs hatton 920k pacquiao vs hatton 800k
mayweather vs marquez 1million pacquiao vs marquez 400k
mayweather vs mosley 1.4million pacquiao vs clottey 700k
yes "yall" as in, those of you saying that its unfair to compare may mos to pac clottey, where were yall claiming it was unfair to compare may jmm to cotto pac?
its not unfair
look for another excuse and i can careless if you are may fan. your logic is flawed.
Are you ****ing retarded or something?
We are talking about DRAWPOWER given the insane promotion that this fight is gonna get. It is about how much money you will generate to the fight.
A fight vs Joshua Clottey with no 24/7 and considerably less promotion put behind it is not a relevant comparison given the circumstances.
Your logic is like having two runners squaring off about who is faster.
One lines up ready to run and the other guy comes driving a car yelling "not my fault you didnt get one!"
And for the record. I never said it was fair to compare JMM with Cotto fight. I said the opposite.
Im not being biased as you clearly are.
spin my ass ur the one spinning im telling u the truth and now ur trying to reason around it by injecting dumb ass weak arguments
UNTIL YOU DISPROVE WAT I SAY AND ENGAGE THEM DIRECTLY and .. NOT ARQUE AROUND IT, it is the truth bwahahaha
you're right, i'm stumped. i can't argue with you, b/c i don't understand wtf you are saying....
pull out some REAL numbers, then we can go.
by REAL numbers, i mean, what the fights costed to market, and what they made in overall sales.
that shit you're talking about, means nothing.
yea mayweather-mosley was expected to do more, pacquiao-clottey was also. 700K was disappointing.
im talking about the last fight of mayweather and pac wtf do u think i am talking about??
in the lead up b4 mayweather and ssm mosley fight, golden boy promotion including gayweather promotion manager ellerbe all projected the fight to make 3 million ppv base off the amount of hype generated from all the media coverage and advertisement of floyd and that's understandable while on the other hand pac and clottey were very very minimally advertise, they had like 1 media conferance in the state of texas alone with no 24-7 and pretty much no marketing behind it
i gotta spoon feed that shit to you like youre a noob here geez
point is, you get more bang for your buck for pac because he is clearly the bigger draw
spin it any way you want.....700K is a disappointment for a fight that supposedly sold 50-60,000 seats.
Floyd's last PPV without a 24/7 = 350K
Pac's last PPV without a 24/7 = 700K
Why didn't PAC had a 24/7 to begin with??! because it's the same BS over and over...nobody wanted to see it..
why he made sense.. u dumb **** and if floyd and ssm didnt do any 24/7 plus ride pac's cock with their pac name dropping just to piggyback his name, they aint gonna do 1.4 million.. he doesnt need respect from a dumb mother****er like u
wat happen to the 3 million ppv?? FAIL
here's another good comparison
floyd + 3 million ppv's worth of advertising = 1.4 mil= -50% decrease in projected profit from advertising point
pac + 0 ppv's worth of advertising = 700k= 700,000% increase in profit from an advertising point of view
700,000% > -50%
numbers dont lie:spankme:
this numbers exist and r not bias UNLES U TRYING TO REASON AROUND IT INSTEAD OF DIRECTLY DISPUTING IT.. which u cant
pac is the real prize fighter, may is a dud when the numbers r tallied and u see the net loss
FACT
Yeah and you're just as stupid.
For the record, may you please state the dates of each of their respective fights, and then try to argue how it's relevant? :lol1:
why he made sense.. u dumb **** and if floyd and ssm didnt do any 24/7 plus ride pac's cock with their pac name dropping just to piggyback his name, they aint gonna do 1.4 million.. he doesnt need respect from a dumb mother****er like u
wat happen to the 3 million ppv?? FAIL
here's another good comparison
floyd + 3 million ppv's worth of advertising = 1.4 mil= -50% decrease in projected profit from advertising point
pac + 0 ppv's worth of advertising = 700k= 700,000% increase in profit from an advertising point of view
700,000% > -50%
numbers dont lie:spankme:
this numbers exist and r not bias UNLES U TRYING TO REASON AROUND IT INSTEAD OF DIRECTLY DISPUTING IT.. which u cant
pac is the real prize fighter, may is a dud when the numbers r tallied and u see the net loss
FACT
u can't be serious.....tf are you talking about? :thinking:
Mayweather for once please let boxing fans see you fight Pacquiao. Money comes and goes and it's time for you to think about your legacy.
Money will follow after you defeat Pacquiao.
Floyd's last PPV without a 24/7 = 350K
Pac's last PPV without a 24/7 = 700K
furthermore, he stated he'd do this back in february. idk why everybody is shocked either.
pac will give in, fight will get done. 55-45.
floyd spend a 3 million PPV worth of advertising and came up 1.5 million PPV short.. PAC sold 0 PPV worth of advertising and came up with 700k PPV.. you tell me who's the draw.. the one who u put 3 dollars in and and got robbed a dollar fifty or the guy u didnt spend anything on and he pulls in a net gain
im pretty damn sure GOLDEN BOY is pretty pissed off at may for spending all that dough to promote him only to come up short:You_Rock_
the most logical split should be 90-10 in favor of pac, because we all know no matter how much the promoters spend on may, they will have a huge net loss BUUUUUT im more than sure pac will only take 50-50 and hey im alright with that because a 90-10 he rightly deserves will just be another reason for may to duck and pac and all boxing fans dont want that...pac will rightly give up his right share and ensure the fight because that's whats relevant to everyone in boxing when u look at the bigger picture and the only reason anyone is tuning in to watch may is because of PAC.. just like they tune in because of hatton and hoya.. TO SEE ALL 3 of them beat his ass.. MAY COULDNT SELL AN ARENA BY HIMSELF UNLESS IT WAS IN THE GHETTO AND THATS A FACT!
O wow, dumbest pactard post of the decade???? there as so many things wrong with it you should be banned from posting ever again
your post is a contradiction.
its not unfair to compare may mosley to pac clottey. these were their most recent fights.
where were yall, claiming it was unfair to compare may jmm to pac cotto?
its not unfair.
"yall"?
I am infact a Floyd fan.
Simple logic states comparing the two fights are horrible.
Cotto and Mosley fights are however equal in exposure(24/7) and name recognition.
In the same post i also state Floyd has shown to be the bigger draw and deserve the bigger cut. Maybe you didnt read that.
dumb post from a dumb poster.
Pac-clottey was did not have a 24/7, was not a walking advirtisement.
Floyd-mosley did have a 24/7, and had a tons of advitisements.
They are comparing pac-cotto to floyd-mosley because they both had 24/7s and had decent exposure on tv and etc.
:spankme:
1.4 is greater than 1.2. And if you dont agree i ask would you rather have 1.2 million dollars or 1.5 million dollars?
plus there would be no 24/7 with out mayweather.
plus would a 24/7 pac even be good?
i mean what is he gonna do? Stutter and then sing soft ballads from the
80's??
Pacs last 3 opponents before PPV without 24/7:Cotto,Hatton and DLH which are all his highest 3 ppv buy opponenets and he headlined 2.
Mayweathers last 3 opponents beforfe PPV without 24/7:Judah,Shamba Mitchell and gatti which one wasnt a ppv event and the other 2 were his first ppvs and he headlined only 1 of them.
Also Clotteys very minimal fan base is likely larger than Baldimors at that point.
Try again.
yep yep yeppers