Nacho Beristain on Floyd Mayweather, Jr Vs Manny Pacquiao prediction

Nacho trying to say that the judges will give pac the fight because pac is spectacular and floyd is boring even when he's dominating.

People should be coming to Beristain for more insight. His prediction and reasoning behind it, blew my mind. One fighter is "spectacular" and the other is "unspectacular". Pure genius!!!! that pretty much sums it up. i mean there's no denying floyd is a master boxer, but then again so are the klitschkos. but they're so darn boring .... give me a tyson over the klitschkos any day give us pacquiao over boringweather ... That's not true Mayweather and Klits aren't on the same level. Klits are the most boring thing i've EVER seen in boxing. Floyd is entertaining as hell. Except for the Baldomir and DLH fights, Floyd was involoved in a lot of classic brawls and dog fights: against Corley, Judah, Hatton; Castillo and Mosley. I agree with Beristain's point: Pacquiao is a much more entertaining fighter. An A level version of Arturo Gatti.

That's the opinion of a boxing trainer/expert, i can respect that even though i disagree. He picked southpaw stance+ workrate over skills+timing. Floyd needs to throw a lot more against Pacquiao, that's a fact. He needs the same kind of performance he produced VS Mosley.

People should be coming to Beristain for more insight. His prediction and reasoning behind it, blew my mind. One fighter is "spectacular" and the other is "unspectacular". Pure genius!!!!

How do you see the Floyd Mayweather, Jr Vs Manny Pacquiao fight playing out if it ever happens? NB: I’m inclined to pick Pacquiao because he’s the type of fighter that creates spectacular fights, he does not compromise to be spectacular, and also due to what I saw Shane Mosley do to Mayweather in the second round of their fight. I think it will be a spectacular, high tension fight; Pacquiao has very fast hands and hits very hard – great tools to have. Meanwhile Mayweather is always on the defensive and always takes the safest route, always short of spectacular. In that regard I don’t give Mayweather much credit. Sure he wins, but at what cost? For the people that pay for expensive tickets, it seems they are being shortchanged. He gives great lessons in boxing; no one will argue that, but very little spectacle and excitement. http://**********.com/pag/article.php?aid=19942 If the fight goes the distance i think the judges have an obligation to the sport to just give the decision to pac. Becasue you know he will have earnt it.

I am actually surprised. Nacho knows his boxing. But to choose Pacquiao simply because he throws more punches is stupid. So Pacquiao wins because he has a spectacular style? gtfo Nacho you cunt.... Get back to crying over Mayweather schooling your boy Marquez he didn't said anything like that. he even said mayweather wins. but just questioned its excitement.and other stuffs like that.

Link doesn't seem to work pal.

He said because Manny is exciting,he would want to pick Manny and also because of the 2nd round of Mayweather-Mosley but Mayweather wins even though he's boring No, read it properly. He picks Pacquiao and says Mayweather wins fights in general but is boring and unspectacular when doing it.

I am actually surprised. Nacho knows his boxing. But to choose Pacquiao simply because he throws more punches is stupid. I didn't see him mention punch output at all :S

Nacho is very clever trainer not so a good manager but very clever with his methods, But you cant pick a winner just based on the fact that Pacquiao looks spectacular while Mayweather doesnt.

"Inclined to pick Pac" means deep down he knows Floyd would fight a boring fight just to have that victory over Pac.

And Marquez schools Pacquiao at 140lbs and lower. Try again. Too bad there were judges that scores the fight and unfortunatelly you are not one of them... better luck next time :)

yeah at ww......lol...... And Marquez schools Pacquiao at 140lbs and lower. Try again.

BEFORE the Pac vs Cotto scrap he picked Pac to stop Cotto and also picked Pac to beat Floyd if it happened http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=312619&highlight=nacho

So Pacquiao wins because he has a spectacular style? gtfo Nacho you cunt.... Get back to crying over Mayweather schooling your boy Marquez He said because Manny is exciting,he would want to pick Manny and also because of the 2nd round of Mayweather-Mosley but Mayweather wins even though he's boring

How do you see the Floyd Mayweather, Jr Vs Manny Pacquiao fight playing out if it ever happens? NB: I’m inclined to pick Pacquiao because he’s the type of fighter that creates spectacular fights, he does not compromise to be spectacular, and also due to what I saw Shane Mosley do to Mayweather in the second round of their fight. I think it will be a spectacular, high tension fight; Pacquiao has very fast hands and hits very hard – great tools to have. Meanwhile Mayweather is always on the defensive and always takes the safest route, always short of spectacular. In that regard I don’t give Mayweather much credit. Sure he wins, but at what cost? For the people that pay for expensive tickets, it seems they are being shortchanged. He gives great lessons in boxing; no one will argue that, but very little spectacle and excitement. http://**********.com/pag/article.php?aid=19942 He likes Pacquiao but knows Mayweather will win.

lol, Nacho is pretty clever. He really didn't give a clear cut winner but he apparently chose Mayweather to win but by being boring. :lol1:

I am actually surprised. Nacho knows his boxing. But to choose Pacquiao simply because he throws more punches is stupid.

Flomos to discredit Nacho as a trainer in 3, 2, 1....

Repost. Of course he's going to say that when Mayweather schooled Marquez over 12.