What's everybody's gripe with Paul Williams being ranked #3 P4P?

I'm asking this because I saw the Yahoo rankings, and the only guys on there that have a better body of work overall are Pacquiao and Mayweather. Skills aside, I didn't see anybody else on there with a better resume than Paul Williams. This is the truth. Why can't some people on here put their hard feelings aside and realize that Mosley, JMM, Martinez, and even Dawson and Adamek don't have a better body of work than Paul Williams. When I say that I mean when you talk about what have you done for me lately. And don't bring titles into this shit either. Mayweather didn't even pay for one when he beat Mosley's ass. What have Casamayor or Diaz gone on to do? Nothing. Tarver is a frigging TV commentator. Adamek has went on to be successful at higher weights. But outside of that I don't see anything that impessive about Chad'e resume. And yet Sergio Martinez went on to beat Pavlik. Margarito put together a three fight winning streak despite being wiped out by Mosley. Now the reason why you can't rank Martinez over Williams P4P is because of the head to head match up. It's just being biased. Do people rank Clottey over Cotto P4P? No, they don't. And even though it happened a long time ago Martinez does have a knockout loss to Margarito. To sum it up, the only two guys that were on that P4P list that I could see giving Williams a run for his money where competing on a P4P scale goes is Dawson and Martinez themselves. Dawson's resume is good too, but he is a lot more inactive than Williams. And I explained the deal with Martinez. So what's everybody's problem with Williams being at #3? I'm not on any nuthugging shit, because unlike Burner I do admit that Williams has flaws and I don't think he could beat Hopkins even at this stage like Burner does. But I think the guy gets way too much hate and not enough credit.