Dont kid yourselves.
He throws every punch in the book with speed, power and laser precision. Also he places punches in the perfect spots.
He mixes it up between body and head punches. He rarely misses.
Saying Pac has the best offense is like saying Paul Williams has the best offense.
Just because you take the most shots in the NBA doesnt make you the best offensive player.
That is all.
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z285/raypaterson2/Pretty.gif
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z285/raypaterson2/PrettyPunching2.gif
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z285/raypaterson2/PrettyPunching.gif
No,no, and no. If you want to say he is the more complete fighter then Manny, ok I won't argue to much with that. However to say that he is the superior offensive fighter -- when he's in fact an economical precise counter puncher who's game is bult on using his superior defense and ungodly ability to counter punch off his opponents mistakes as being the best offensive fighter -- no that is not what an offensive fighter is about. Floyd's best offense is his defense. Based on weighing the criteria above, Manny Pacquaio's offensive repertoire, is what define's an offensive fighter. You will not see him sitting back in the pocket waiting for opportunities; or waiting for his opponents to make mistakes to counter (which the Pacquiao of present can now do). When you watch Manny he makes things happen with his take no prisoners style of fighting by finding openings, using his in-out movement, side-to-side, throwing combinations from all different types of angels, with speed, power, and well balanced rhythm. Manny is always pressing the action, and that is why he is one of the most exciting fighters in boxing to watch -- he's like watching a hurricane destroy what ever is in it's way -- and that my friend, Mayweather is not. That is all!
EXCELLENT POST.........this is exactly how I feel, there is a difference between economical execution an overwhelming combination punching
Dont kid yourselves.
He throws every punch in the book with speed, power and laser precision. Also he places punches in the perfect spots.
He mixes it up between body and head punches. He rarely misses.
Saying Pac has the best offense is like saying Paul Williams has the best offense.
Just because you take the most shots in the NBA doesnt make you the best offensive player.
That is all.
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z285/raypaterson2/Pretty.gif
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z285/raypaterson2/PrettyPunching2.gif
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z285/raypaterson2/PrettyPunching.gif
No,no, and no. If you want to say he is the more complete fighter then Manny, ok I won't argue to much with that. However to say that he is the superior offensive fighter -- when he's in fact an economical precise counter puncher who's game is bult on using his superior defense and ungodly ability to counter punch off his opponents mistakes as being the best offensive fighter -- no that is not what an offensive fighter is about. Floyd's best offense is his defense. Based on weighing the criteria above, Manny Pacquaio's offensive repertoire, is what define's an offensive fighter. You will not see him sitting back in the pocket waiting for opportunities; or waiting for his opponents to make mistakes to counter (which the Pacquiao of present can now do). When you watch Manny he makes things happen with his take no prisoners style of fighting by finding openings, using his in-out movement, side-to-side, throwing combinations from all different types of angels, with speed, power, and well balanced rhythm. Manny is always pressing the action, and that is why he is one of the most exciting fighters in boxing to watch -- he's like watching a hurricane destroy what ever is in it's way -- and that my friend, Mayweather is not. That is all!
Dont kid yourselves.
He throws every punch in the book with speed, power and laser precision. Also he places punches in the perfect spots.
He mixes it up between body and head punches. He rarely misses.
Saying Pac has the best offense is like saying Paul Williams has the best offense.
Just because you take the most shots in the NBA doesnt make you the best offensive player.
That is all.
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z285/raypaterson2/Pretty.gif
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z285/raypaterson2/PrettyPunching2.gif
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z285/raypaterson2/PrettyPunching.gif
Most efficient offense yes, most dominate offense no.
pac offense is not as good as people are trying to make it seem. if pac offense is as good as people say he would have koed clottey but guess what he couldt. pac was loss in the sauce in how to break clottey defense with his so call superior offense.
LMAO.
And how many rounds did clottey won.
pac offense is not as good as people are trying to make it seem. if pac offense is as good as people say he would have koed clottey but guess what he couldt. pac was loss in the sauce in how to break clottey defense with his so call superior offense.
clottey didn't open up and who has hurt or opened up clottey previously???? yup noone. have a good day.
Cmon man if your just going to troll whats the point of the debate?
why even debate when your extremely biased and your mind is already set. i would say your heart and your hands are already at floyds nuts. you ask a question and given some logical explanations. no rebuttal but efficiency?
so you rather have a gun that is a bit more accurate vs output and damage then extreme output a little bit less precise, comes in BUNCHES, doesn't stop coming, can go 12 full rounds, jumps in and out on you, and explodes like the energizer bunny?
failure at life and your guido avatar makes you more of a fool from now on.
Cmon man if your just going to troll whats the point of the debate?
that's a serious question man.. what is your opinion?? calderon is a mini version of floyd, he is undefeated aswell.
So does Williams and Calzaghe.
I know you don't like it when Pac has an edge over Floyd, but being a better offensive fighter doesn't equal who's the more complete fighter..But you have to tell it like it is, Manny is the better all-around offensive fighter..
Yeah, i understand that..But Pacquiao can throw them in so many awkward directions that it can completely make anyone uncomfortable and out of their game plan..
So does Williams and Calzaghe.
Burner Calderon has better offense than Pac too?? claderon's the shit man he barely misses he shits on pac's offense too??
Cmon man if your just going to troll whats the point of the debate?
Burner Calderon has better offense than Pac too?? claderon's the shit man undefeated, rarely misses, throws every punch in the book, basically a mini version of floyd. he shits on pac's offense too??
Throwing more punches doesnt equal greater offense.
Yeah, i understand that..But Pacquiao can throw them in so many awkward directions that it can completely make anyone uncomfortable and out of their game plan..
Burner, let it go man..Pacquiao's offense is better, just accept that Floyd is more accurate..
Pretty much what I'm thinking, Floyd is certainly the better counter puncher,and as someone mentioned above, he more efficient. But Pacquiao can counter punch, show excellent accuracy and he can put together devastating combinations.
Pac has the better offense.
Whats hilarious about comparing him to Paul Williams? I alsocompared him to Calzaghe as well.
ok maybe i see some similarities just like i see between floyd and Bhop.
So Valero had the best offense?
:thinking:
Well i cant really make a statement about that, cause ive only seen a handful of Valero's fight highlights.
But i dont see this as anything but our own opinion on who has the best offense, if its punch accuracy youd have to say Floyd, but if you see it as punch output and K.O's id say Pac.