I was just watching Pacquiao v Barerra I, and realized Paquiao was a 4 to 1 underdog going into that fight. It got me wondering what fights Floyd went into as an underdog, especially a big underdog...?
I bet if Mayweather had fought the extremely slow and unskilled Margarito people probably would have said he just wanted an easy fight and was ducking the champion, Baldomir. I mean, it isn't like Margarito would have been at all competitive against Mayweather.
you think baldomir and margarito are comparable? that's laughable.
1 guy is a journeymen who got lucky the linear champ(none of them would fight margarito btw) gasses in every fight and is 1-5 at welterweight. bingo he struck gold. then he beat a shot gatti and faded into bolivian losing just about every fight for the rest of his career.
the other is a guy who has been champ since 2002, was ranked in the top 3 since 2002, was ranked number 1 for over 3 years, has beaten such guys as andrew lewis, kermit cintron twice, joshua clottey, miguel cotto, and even fought paul williams to a close fight.
baldomir lost once and fell off the planet. not the sign of a very good fighter. margarito has been around for the last decade and even after taking some losses(santos debatable) still stuck around and fought the best time after time. that's staying power the sign of a good fighter.
baldomir is a slow plodder and even he managed to back floyd into the ropes a bunch of times in the fight. margarito may be slow but he's long, has more power, throws tons more punches and does not quit unless you hurt him(floyd can't). i doubt it would have been easy for mayweather. you can hang your hat on that victory over the super journeyman but i'd say a victory over margarito would have gone a lot farther.
and honestly who else could baldomir beat at welterweight to keep his linear status? the first real risk he would have took would have ended him. cotto, clottey, quintana, collazo, williams etc... his best bet would have been to remain stagnant like james braddock(original cinderella man) did after winning the heavyweight title until a huge fight 2 years later presented itself against joe louis. the man no one ever knocked out was then knocked out cold. luckily for baldomir a huge fight with mayweather came along much earlier and he cashed out.
and i bet mayweather set that whole charade up so he could have 2 easy fights in a row against judah and baldomir while pretending margarito didn't exist. probably threw some money at kenny and told him to say that.
I bet if Mayweather had fought the extremely slow and unskilled Margarito people probably would have said he just wanted an easy fight and was ducking the champion, Baldomir. I mean, it isn't like Margarito would have been at all competitive against Mayweather.
and i bet mayweather set that whole charade up so he could have 2 easy fights in a row against judah and baldomir while pretending margarito didn't exist. probably threw some money at kenny and told him to say that.
I see that I was right and you arent ever going to give him any credit. Now come back with your sarcasm. Seriously though, its alright to give the man credit sometimes even if you dont think he's as great as other do
and i bet mayweather set that whole charade up so he could have 2 easy fights in a row against judah and baldomir while pretending margarito didn't exist. probably threw some money at kenny and told him to say that.
The Margarito who at the time had 1 significant win in Kermit Cintron?
well..he was the linear champ and brian kenny claimed floyd was ducking him
and i bet mayweather set that whole charade up so he could have 2 easy fights in a row against judah and baldomir while pretending margarito didn't exist. probably threw some money at kenny and told him to say that.
Floyd has never been the betting underdog.
It is completely logical. If you are the best, you will always be considered a favourite.
Even against the "so called best p4p" Mayweather has opened as a solid betting favourite at -140.
Pacquiao came into the Barrera fight with 2 losses. Mayweather has never come into a fight with a loss.
You guys act like it means Pacquiao has achieved more in his career just because he's been an underdog before. When you're as good as Mayweather (Pacquiao isn't) and undefeated, you aren't an underdog ever unless you're fighting a guy way bigger than you.
LOL Mayweather was a big favorite against Corrales. Few thought Corrales would win. I admit his inexperiance made him an underdog against Hernandez though.
Corrales was undefeated and ranked #5 P4P at the time. Mayweather was ranked #7 P4P. There were lots of people who thought Corrales would win.
He was an underdog against Hernandez and Corrales, but only a very slight underdog as the odds were nearly even. That's what happens when you have a great amateur career and dominate almost every opponent you face as a pro, pretty soon people learn not to bet against you. In the last 7 years or so I think the closest he has come to being an underdog was against Oscar and against Hatton, he was only about a 2-1 favorite in each of those fights. Floyd was 2.5-1 vs Marquez, 4-1 vs Mosley, 4-1 vs Gatti, 5-1 vs Judah, 6-1 vs Baldomir, and 11-1 vs Shramba Mitchell.
baldomir. he was the linear welterweight champion of the world. that must mean you are good right? i mean not any old journeyman can be called that oh.....
LOL Mayweather was a big favorite against Corrales. Few thought Corrales would win. I admit his inexperiance made him an underdog against Hernandez though.
People thought Corrales would beat him but I don't think he was a big underdog...
And apparently a select few thought Gatti could beat him..................