which win was better?

Mosley gassed often even when he was young. To me he looked physically fine, but he just had absolutely no answer to Mayweather's game and looked beaten quite early on - which I thought was weird considering the near unrivaled success he had in round 2.

Cotto for Pac or Mosley for Mayweather? Consider skill level, condition, how far their were past their prime as so on. Mosley to me looked around 80-90 percent of the guy who fought cotto or margo. It could be because mayweather made him looked like that but you know punch stats showed mayweather threw VERy little body punches... so why the hell was mosley gassed out by the 4th? I am inclined to go for Cotto as I think he was a better boxer than a 38 year old Mosley but you know I want to know what others think Tough call, both Shane an Cotto were coming off big wins but I'd give it to Pac. He also dominated Cotto in his own way, but a TKO is much more impressive to me than a UD.

Cotto for Pac, Mosley was too old. Hindsight is perfect and all that but that's the truth, he didn't have the fitness and gassed inside 2.

this was discussed before the fight. it's definitely mosley for mayweather. coming into his fight with manny, many ppl felt cotto had lost 2 of his last 3 fights. mosley on the other hand, was coming off probably the biggest, and most improbable win of his career.

mosley for mayweather and i say it with a heavy cotto is my favorite fighter but i think after the margo fight he hasnt had the killer instinct and his stamina has been an issue for awhile now