Views of Jim Lampley, Emmanuel Steward and Bert Sugar Regarding Todays Super Fight!

I'm suprised Jim didn't mention Shane being good on the inside, that dude was a vicious body puncher in his heyday and at this point in the game Shane can't afford to play the boxer role on the outside. That's the same exact thing I was saying. He claimed Mayweather was meaner than Mosley. Nazim let us all know what's up with that.

I'm suprised Jim didn't mention Shane being good on the inside, that dude was a vicious body puncher in his heyday and at this point in the game Shane can't afford to play the boxer role on the outside.

Surprisingly good analysis from Lampley.

Excellent post man. Nice to see their videos. As usual Emanuel doesn't commit to a prediction which is kinda ....anticlimatic.

steward is the only one really saying anything. red k given for weak ass analyses

Lampley's description of Shane Mosley not having a very good jab is kinda accurate. But I think Mosley's jab is better than what people make it out to be even though he does use it as a range finder in a lot of cases. I however don't agree with Lampley's assessment of Mosley trying to fight a technical fight with Floyd. And by that I mean doing what he said of going in and out. Mosley needs to be aggressive and keep up the combinations at the same time. And how the fuck is Mayweather meaner than Mosley? I don't get this notion at all.

bert sugar never makes predictions anymore.

Bert Sugar is the man. On MMA... "It'll be gone in 5 years" "Nothing better than watching 2 men try to mount each other"