Timothy Bradley has similarities that remind me of Hasegawa.

Bradley is one of the Top 5 PFP fighters in the world. Hasegawa is garbage, just another Pacquiao-style fraud with a puffed-up record. There are no similarities. yea ur ****in dumb ,bradley's feather fisted ass couldn't touch hasegawa

That's true. And I could easily disagree with your opinions too. But I'm sure you wouldn't disagree that Bradley has the better defense, timing and reflexes. I mean anyone with two eyes could see that. So its still even. And stuff like this is why I think Bradley's a better counter puncher. He also did the same to Witter: Look at 0:27 And you're still failing to answer my question on how Bradley is overhyped, but Alexander (who has one really good fight to his name) isn't. Bradley has very SNEAKY power. That shot was very on point and I even felt that.

Fernando Montiel is the Mexican Rustico Torrecampo.

Bradley is one of the Top 5 PFP fighters in the world. Hasegawa is garbage, just another Pacquiao-style fraud with a puffed-up record. There are no similarities.

There's nothing Alexander done to show he's above Bradley at this moment,, and when Bradley mops the floor with Maidana, all the haters and doubters are gonna realize he's above Alexander..Alexander needs to start stepping his game up quickly, and looking for a fight with Zab ain't cutting it..

You're the one who thinks Bradley is a better counter puncher. Not me. That's true. And I could easily disagree with your opinions too. But I'm sure you wouldn't disagree that Bradley has the better defense, timing and reflexes. I mean anyone with two eyes could see that. So its still even. And stuff like this is why I think Bradley's a better counter puncher. He also did the same to Witter: Look at 0:27 And you're still failing to answer my question on how Bradley is overhyped, but Alexander (who has one really good fight to his name) isn't.

And what does that have to do with Bradley being overhyped? It actually shows that he's not. Not only did he beat these guys, but neither took more than 3 rounds. He also dropped Witter, Peterson and Cherry. You also mentioned Alexander's advantages, and I mentioned Bradley's, which can match those. So based on your logic, its an even fight. You're the one who thinks Bradley is a better counter puncher. Not me.

Cotto had a better resume than Margarito at the time they fought. Did that keep Margarito from beating him? And what does that have to do with Bradley being overhyped? It actually shows that he's not. Not only did he beat these guys, but neither took more than 3 rounds. He also dropped Witter, Peterson and Cherry. Overhyped fighters wouldn't do that. He's proven himself much more than Alexander, Khan and Ortiz. You also mentioned Alexander's advantages, and I mentioned Bradley's, which can match those. So based on your logic, its an even fight.

Cotto had a better resume than Margarito at the time they fought. Did that keep Margarito from beating him? Resumes don't always determine winners, but I sure you can find better examples that are so disputable. Hand wraps and all. But I get your point. Still, barring a good K.O. punch, I just think Bradley's too good for Alexander.

What? How is Bailey, N'Dou, Malignaggi, Corley and Torres not a good resume? Besides Floyd, who did he duck? Tszyu, Mitchell and Judah were either gone or moved up. And as for Bradley's resume, how is Holt, Peterson, Cherry, Witter and soon to be Maidana not a good resume? Name one fighter in the JWW division that has a better resume than that. Alexander: Decision against Corley, RTD against Witter on hand trauma and KO against Urango Khan: Decision against Kotelnik (who lost to Witter) and a 3 KD rule stoppage over Dmitry fricken Salita Ortiz: Quittage loss to Maidana and KO victories over Diaz and Allatorre I dare anyone to say those resumes can compare... Cotto had a better resume than Margarito at the time they fought. Did that keep Margarito from beating him?

What's so great about Bradley's opposition? It's like Cotto's resume at 140. A long line of good, but not elite fighters. What? How is Bailey, N'Dou, Malignaggi, Corley and Torres not a good resume? Besides Floyd, who did he duck? Tszyu, Mitchell and Judah were either gone or moved up and Ngoudjo was irrelevent. I think Castillo was still at 135, too. And he probably wouldn't have fought Urango because both were trained by Evangelista. And as for Bradley's resume, how is Holt, Peterson, Campbell (short fight but dominant), Cherry, Witter and soon to be Maidana not a good resume? Name one fighter in the JWW division that has a better resume than that. Alexander: Decision against Corley, RTD against Witter on hand trauma and KO against Urango Khan: Decision against Kotelnik (who lost to Witter) and a 3 KD rule stoppage over Dmitry fricken Salita Ortiz: Quittage loss to Maidana and KO victories over Diaz and Allatorre I dare anyone to say those resumes can compare...

But who has the better defense, reflexes, timing, etc? Bradley. Whose the better counter puncher? Bradley.. They each have their advantages, which makes it so even. Its funny because I heard these same mismatch speeches before Bradley-Holt, and when he went out there and gave him a boxing lesson everyone was so quick to dismiss Holt. Holt may not be as strong as Urango, but he is faster, longer and is a counter puncher. His punches are more accurate and you don't always see them coming, which makes them more dangerous than Urango's. Bradley was dropped in the first round because he fell right into Holt's s**t talking trap prior to the opening bell, and attacked him. The second knockdown was a great counter by Holt that Bradley didn't see. It didn't hurt him at all. Holt just punched him and moved out of the way quickly so Bradley could fall. That's what makes Holt a good fighter. He was severely weight drained in his last fight, so I'm very curious to see how he does at 147. And its not fair to say Bradley is overhyped but Alexander isn't. The dude had one fricken fight and everyone jumps on his sack. He failed to stop DeMarcus Corley and fought Witter just as efficiently as Bradley (only Witter was stopped because of hand trauma). And didn't he lose a lot of rounds against some random dude who took the fight on two weeks notice? Alexander is good, but saying Bradley and Khan have no chance against him after one fight is just ridiculous. truth. people are all over alexander as much as they are bradley. just because of a highlight reel ko

i don't really see the comparison... you calling both bradley and hasegawa hype jobs? No, they are good fighters. Being overrated by some posters and being a hype job are two different things to me. I think both fighters would be capable of bouncing back from a loss as I think Hozumi will.

Bradley is a great boxer, no doubt the best guy at 140lbs atm

I analyze their styles and it's not just Alexander's power advantage over him. It's the whole package. Better jab, stamina is a toss up, better footwork, better chin (Urango hits harder than Holt). This is why Bradley is saying he'll fight Maidana, Khan, and then Alexander. But who has the better defense, reflexes, timing, etc? Bradley. Whose the better counter puncher? Bradley.. They each have their advantages, which makes it so even. Its funny because I heard these same mismatch speeches before Bradley-Holt, and when he went out there and gave him a boxing lesson everyone was so quick to dismiss Holt. Holt may not be as strong as Urango, but he is faster, longer and is a counter puncher. His punches are more accurate and you don't always see them coming, which makes them more dangerous than Urango's. Bradley was dropped in the first round because he fell right into Holt's s**t talking trap prior to the opening bell, and attacked him. The second knockdown was a great counter by Holt that Bradley didn't see. It didn't hurt him at all. Holt just punched him and moved out of the way quickly so Bradley could fall. That's what makes Holt a good fighter. He was severely weight drained in his last fight, so I'm very curious to see how he does at 147. And its not fair to say Bradley is overhyped but Alexander isn't. The dude had one fricken fight and everyone jumps on his sack. He failed to stop DeMarcus Corley and fought Witter just as efficiently as Bradley (only Witter was stopped because of hand trauma). And didn't he lose a lot of rounds against some random dude who took the fight on two weeks notice? Alexander is good, but saying Bradley and Khan have no chance against him after one fight is just ridiculous.

What's so great about Bradley's opposition? It's like Cotto's resume at 140. A long line of good, but not elite fighters. I said it was better than Hasegawa's. Not that hard to understand, Iceta. You admit that Bradley's opposition is a long line of good fighters. With exception of Montiel, Hasegawa's recent opposition is long line of decent fighters who aren't as good or as accomplished as Bradley's recent opponents.

Everybody is on his dick talking about how he'll beat everybody at 140. No doubt he deserves his position in the sport and I got him top ten P4P, but he's not beating Alexander. Believe that. i don't really see the comparison... you calling both bradley and hasegawa hype jobs?

And you're saying this comparable to Hasegawa because many thought Hasegawa was unbeatable at 118? The main difference to me is that Bradley has very arguably had a tougher lineup recently. So if anything, it's more believable to me that Bradley is "unbeatable" at his weight. What's so great about Bradley's opposition? It's like Cotto's resume at 140. A long line of good, but not elite fighters.

Hasegawa was kicking ass till he got cought!!!! I see him dominatng in a rematch!!!

Maybe He said that knowing a fight with Alexander down the road is a big fight? Since HBO now has both of their backs and of course wants them to meet in a big fight soon. And I think Bradley has experience over Alexander atm and if anything I feel Bradley is the tougher of the two. No doubt Alexander's skillset is good but i don't see anything special about it yet. Maybe with better opposition i'll change my mind, but atm i don't see how you could truely believe Alexander is a cut above Bradley, yet.