fack this hypocrite making a thread about ronnie being biased.. but reaD almost all his post about PAC he is so biased and just a hater.. facking HYPOCRITE!!
Ronnie must be laughing his ass off when reading about this.
Try to put him on ignore Pureboxignorant, show him how OBJECTIVE you are.Hey pare, I remember seeing ronnie in person during a boxing event here in our city, I don't know whether to shake his hand or slap his head. I just forget about approaching him. Next time I see him in person, I'd ask him about his reactions to threads talking about him in this forum. Just curious.
the difference is bias is not a mistake for pure boxer, it isnt for most humans in this world. we are all biased in one way or another. but journalists are supposed to assume the guise of being unbiased, unlesss they are writing opinion pieces, which ronnie doesnt really write.
ok ok i got you dude.. im good but to me he is still a hypocrite..
i know i know... but there is a difference between a person looking at others mistakes but he himself is doing those mistakes.. cmon its really simple..
the difference is bias is not a mistake for pure boxer, it isnt for most humans in this world. we are all biased in one way or another. but journalists are supposed to assume the guise of being unbiased, unlesss they are writing opinion pieces, which ronnie doesnt really write.
lol, ok ill try to explain. ronnie is a journalist. he's supposed to tell news unbiasedly or at least not make his bias so apparent. its an art form amoung journalists actually. he's just blatanly biased. the fact is almost no1 who posts on this site likes his articles because they are so biased.
on the other hand, we have pure boxer. he posts on a foums where nearly everyone is biased and the idea is to let other ppl with a similar hobby/pastime/interest post their ideas/beliefs on that subject whether they are biased or not. it really isnt that hard to understand.
i know i know... but there is a difference between a person looking at others mistakes but he himself is doing those mistakes.. cmon its really simple..
I guess common sense dont get replies in here!
i know ur point man im just comparing his views on what is being biased and Unbiased.. doesnt have to be a MOD a simple poster or even the president.
so u think he is not BIASED against PAC??? answer me please..
lol, ok ill try to explain. ronnie is a journalist. he's supposed to tell news unbiasedly or at least not make his bias so apparent. its an art form amoung journalists actually. he's just blatanly biased. the fact is almost no1 who posts on this site likes his articles because they are so biased.
on the other hand, we have pure boxer. he posts on a foums where nearly everyone is biased and the idea is to let other ppl with a similar hobby/pastime/interest post their ideas/beliefs on that subject whether they are biased or not. it really isnt that hard to understand.
he is clearly bias in Floyd Mayweather's favour......that's not my point i am making..........keep thinking kid.....you may get there eventually.
so he is not a hypocrite??/
so u think he is not BIASED against PAC??? answer me please..
he is clearly bias in Floyd Mayweather's favour......that's not my point i am making..........keep thinking kid.....you may get there eventually.
but im not dumb to figure this out.. being biased and unbiased.. judging others but not looking at urself.. theres something wrong right?
you figure it out yet???
get back to me when you do?
....it's ok....i'll wait.
There is a difference.....apparently you are not smart enough to figure it out.
but im not dumb to figure this out.. being biased and unbiased.. judging others but not looking at urself.. theres something wrong right?
fack this hypocrite making a thread about ronnie being biased.. but reaD almost all his post about PAC he is so biased and just a hater.. facking HYPOCRITE!!
There is a difference.....apparently you are not smart enough to figure it out.