Could Pacquiao go through Mayweather's resume undefeated?

i dont have to put words in your mouths just got back and read your own responses in this thread you admitedthat the fighters on floyds resume are a tough challenege for pac and he wouldnt make it through with a Zero floyd would skate through pacs floyds resume is ttougher than pacs but pac is greater? now you are contradicting yourself. dont change up now man, you said it and you know it pacs resume is full of names and thats it. Floyds Resume>>>>Pacs Pacs resume >>>>>>> Floyds resume Cry about it all you like,it wont change a thing :bottle:

i dont have to put words in your mouths just got back and read your own responses in this thread you admitedthat the fighters on floyds resume are a tough challenege for pac and he wouldnt make it through with a Zero floyd would skate through pacs floyds resume is ttougher than pacs but pac is greater? now you are contradicting yourself. dont change up now man, you said it and you know it pacs resume is full of names and thats it. Floyds Resume>>>>Pacs Do you understand style makes fights? Pac is a greater fighter than Corrales, Castillo, and Augustus. Can you read? Pac is greater and just overall better than those 3. However, those 3 have the style and attributes to give Pac hell and possibly even beat him. Especially Corrales... Because, style makes fights. Do you understand that concept? And, I also said Floyd would not go undefeated in Pac resume go look back. That he would be drained at 112 and 122. That he might not have been effective at 126 as he was at 130 because he was a big SFW. Going down to featherweight might of weakened him. Go back and look. Pac resume>Floyd resume. That is why I rank Pac higher than Floyd in the ATG list department. And, look at the accomplishments...

so you think Mayweather-castillo was closer then Pac-Marquez? what the hell kind of scoring system you use Well I thought both Pac and Castillo won. So........

this thread has exposed pacs resume. Even an Objective Pac Fan such as Jro has even admited that Floyds resume has tougher competition than Pacs. Pacs resume is full of names but those elite names werent elite fighters by the time pac fought them. and the ones that were, gave pac all he could handle. floyds resme is better competition wise Floyds Resume=Harder opposition Pac Resume=Names When did I admit that? WTF are you talking about? Don't put words in my mout because I don't believe that for a second... If that was the case I would have Floyd as the greater fighter. But, I rank Pac as the greater fighter... You always talking dumbshit for some reason... You never make any sense at all. NEVER... I still Richardson quote.... You make all the good smart knowledgeable Floyd fans look bad...

this thread has exposed pacs resume. Even an Objective Pac Fan such as Jro has even admited that Floyds resume has tougher competition than Pacs. Pacs resume is full of names but those elite names werent elite fighters by the time pac fought them. and the ones that were, gave pac all he could handle. floyds resme is better competition wise Floyds Resume=Harder opposition Pac Resume=Names Can I ask you a question, Do you hate Pac more then you love Floyd?

I thought Pac beat JMM in the rematch by a point. I had it 6 rounds a piece plus an extra point for the knockdown in Pac favor... That fight is a close that either man could of won... So is not a robbery so that means you have to go by what the judges went by. That is like me going around that Floyd is not undefeated cuz I had Castillo beating him the first. But, the first fight was close. It was not a robbery so I go with the judges scorecards... The only time you can make a case that you're trying to make its when it's a clear robbery. A close fight is not a robbery... Pac got the decision Pac won the fight, just like how Williams beat Martinez, and Flyd beat Castillo and many other examples. Oh and I think Pac stops JMM at WW... JMM is just not a WW fighter... I don't even want to see Pac-JMM 140. I am on record in saying I would only give Pac credit if he beats JMM at 135. Nothing higher... so you think Mayweather-castillo was closer then Pac-Marquez? what the hell kind of scoring system you use

He would have stopped everyone Floyd has fought at 135 and above, except Oscar who he would have UD. Below that I expect him to have been beaten, maybe by Corrales or someone early in his career with equal ability to Torrecampo and Singsurat.

Shane? Forrest and Winky(154) I doubt he goes undefeated... And, you not looking at weight-class with Pac resume... Wouldn't Floyd be wait drained at 122? Floyd used to bust Vernon Forrest ass in sparring sessions and wanted to fight him forreal because he already knew he could beat him Roger used to train Forrest in the amatures Floyd also wanted to fight Winky Wright and i think he would have beat him to

I thought Pac beat JMM in the rematch by a point. I had it 6 rounds a piece plus an extra point for the knockdown in Pac favor... That fight is a close that either man could of won... So is not a robbery so that means you have to go by what the judges went by. That is like me going around that Floyd is not undefeated cuz I had Castillo beating him the first. But, the first fight was close. It was not a robbery so I go with the judges scorecards... The only time you can make a case that you're trying to make its when it's a clear robbery. A close fight is not a robbery... Pac got the decision Pac won the fight, just like how Williams beat Martinez, and Flyd beat Castillo and many other examples. Oh and I think Pac stops JMM at WW... JMM is just not a WW fighter... I don't even want to see Pac-JMM 140. I am on record in saying I would only give Pac credit if he beats JMM at 135. Nothing higher... well i dont think he won i thought Marquez cleary took the 12th round but whatever i really dont even care Floyd and Pacquiao are both great fighters and we will see who is better when and if they ever fight

Mayweather goes through Pacquiao and Mosleys resumes undefeated. Shane? Forrest and Winky(154) I doubt he goes undefeated... And, you not looking at weight-class with Pac resume... Wouldn't Floyd be wait drained at 122?

Mayweather goes through Pacquiao and Mosleys resumes undefeated.

he has draw and anybody that saw the 2nd fight knows Marquez really won my point is that they ask can Pacquiao go through Floyd resume undefeated well he fought Marquez and you seen what happen do you think Pacquiao beat Marquez? I thought Pac beat JMM in the rematch by a point. I had it 6 rounds a piece plus an extra point for the knockdown in Pac favor... That fight is a close that either man could of won... So is not a robbery so that means you have to go by what the judges went by. That is like me going around that Floyd is not undefeated cuz I had Castillo beating him the first. But, the first fight was close. It was not a robbery so I go with the judges scorecards... The only time you can make a case that you're trying to make its when it's a clear robbery. A close fight is not a robbery... Pac got the decision Pac won the fight, just like how Williams beat Martinez, and Flyd beat Castillo and many other examples. Oh and I think Pac stops JMM at WW... JMM is just not a WW fighter... I don't even want to see Pac-JMM 140. I am on record in saying I would only give Pac credit if he beats JMM at 135. Nothing higher...

Why talk about the 2009 Pacquaio? It doesn't help prove anything, as you can't go back in time. If you gonna make a thread like this you have to accept that going through a career also means progressing. That's where Floyd has the advantage, since he was great since he turned pro. But nowadays Pacquiao is the beast.

i dont think so those calibre of fighters are better than any fighters on his resume he did not fight the real marquez. Im sorry man. I love Morales and Barerra. JMM is my dude too but Floyd is just on a different level then these guys. No disrespect to any of them but I think Floyd would beat them down. Like really really bad.

i guess yall must not know who De La Hoya is because he not getting enough credit that boy sweet when he was at his best and would have whooped Pacquiao ass in his prime maybe but the one that fought floyd was not prime, floyd just fought cautious.

why? just bec because he is bigger. like your boy said boxing is not a weight lifting contest its skills and pac would outsmarted him and outspeeded him. i guess yall must not know who De La Hoya is because he not getting enough credit that boy sweet when he was at his best and would have whooped Pacquiao ass

We not counting Pac. He beats the brakes of Morales, Barerra and JMM. Lets be real here. i dont think so those calibre of fighters are better than any fighters on his resume he did not fight the real marquez.

who thinks floyd would still be undefeated if he fought in the great featherweight era of morales,barrera,marquez and pac. i dont think he would. We not counting Pac. He beats the brakes of Morales, Barerra and JMM. Lets be real here.

who thinks floyd would still be undefeated if he fought in the great featherweight era of morales,barrera,marquez and pac. i dont think he would.

If I am not mistaken Pac never lost to JMM... What are you talking about? Oh and JMM at 126/130 version>2007 version of Oscar at 154. True Story.... he has draw and anybody that saw the 2nd fight knows Marquez really won my point is that they ask can Pacquiao go through Floyd resume undefeated well he fought Marquez and you seen what happen do you think Pacquiao beat Marquez?