Lets face it you lot score it to who you prefer.

Let me refer tot the best post this week. Froch commanded the Dirrell fight, why does everyone think Dirrell won?, because Dirrell landed the better shots. Froch lands more and makes Kessler miss but because Kessler was the one chasing it, it was a clear victory for Mikkel? I don't get it, what scoring criteria is it. Absolutely spot on. Froch landed more, cleaner punches against kessler, that is fact. Not opinion. The fact that he should have kncoked him out shows this. But the anti froch brigade(seesm like most of the world) scored it to kessler bacuse he pressed the fight??wtf Yet the Moaners against froch are more than happy to flip there arguement against dirrell(even though froch landed far better punches in that fight and bust open his face), claimed that although froc pressed the fight and worked harder, dirrell landed the cleaner punches and had won. So you cannot have it boh ways, either froch won kessler, or he schooled dirrell, but you cannot have it both ways. Lets face it, most people hate froch(slating calzaghe/arrogance etc). So even if yu deep down had ot to froch you will do what you can to score it to his opponent.