Calzaghe Vs Froch early 2009 - who would have won?

Any version of Calzaghe by a painful-to watch unanimous decision. This would be like Calzaghe/Lacy part 2.

any1 who picks froch is a fan boy or a hater of calzaghe look at it with a clear frame of mind theres only 1 winner hell id pick a pre calzaghe lacy to beat froch

calzaghe would have made froch look silly imo. he's got the mouth and promotional abilities of an elite fighter, but the cobra just doesnt have the speed to deal with elite fighters. he's fortunate to be in such a weak division...

About 23 Slaps for every punch Froch lands. Calzaghe by tko

now calzaghe was pretty damn quick, but can you imagine how quick he'd look in the ring with froch? would be like something out of benny hill. calzaghe sits in the pocket ala lacy, avoids the nottingham twats big loopy punches all day and proceeds to slap the ever loving crap out of him.

Calzaghe would still beat Froch now

Calzaghe loses round 1, then wins every minute of every round after that.

just look at wat dirrel did to froch and almost win?? now times that by 10 and add the will to win at all costs and you get a calzaghe 118-112 ud

An aging Calzaghe to win a decision.

look at the 3 people that voted for froch how did i know that they would be shit posters

Although Calzaghe would beat him, I voted Froch for obvious reasons. I don't see any obvious reasons to do such a thing.