Who do you think is best? Haye, Adamek or Arreola?

100% haye. Haye beats both of them.

Just wanted to get your opinions. So, what do you think? Personally I think Haye would beat both of them pretty comfortably. Haye couldn't even beat Valuev comfortably who Arreola and Adamek are better then.

Haye barely beat Valuev, beat a washed up Ruiz and now is #3 in the Heavyweight Rankings. WTF. Lets Go Chris Arreola

haye would ko both of those guys...arreola would be fun to watch...it would accelerate arreolas path to gatekeeper...

Arreola would beat Haye, sorry. Haye would get knocked the **** out or run the whole night and potshot ala Valuev.

Povetkin might have been ahead of him, but I doubt that Chambers was. Got any rankings from that time period? Nope, do you? But I remember them. At that time Chambers had beaten Dimitrenko and Peter, both of whom were top 10 ranked by the RING at the time, and yes, he was ranked ahead of Valuev.

david haye is the most skilled most accomplished and probs has the best resume so david haye am afraid followed by adamek and wtf has arreola done??

I voted for :boxing: Arreola.

1) Haye 2) Arreola 3) Adamek

No, he wasn't. Chagaev, Chambers, Povetkin and of course Vitali, were all ranked above him, which means he was #5 by the RING and #6 overall, and of course he was only ranked that high because he "beat" Holyfield. Povetkin might have been ahead of him, but I doubt that Chambers was. Got any rankings from that time period?

Haye by KO in both fights.

Haye followed by Adamek. Arreloa is just rubbish. Nail, hammer, head, hit.

I'm pretty sure Valuev was the #3 contender for The Ring-belt when he and David fought, which means he was ranked fourth. He was definately a top HW, which is sad. No, he wasn't. Chagaev, Chambers, Povetkin and of course Vitali, were all ranked above him, which means he was #5 by the RING and #6 overall, and of course he was only ranked that high because he "beat" Holyfield.

Haye. Adamek is good, but he is a little over his head at heavyweight and we will see that at some point. Arreola has heart, but the guy just isn't that good and does not have the work ethic he needs.

Man ill take Arreola over them all.. many people forget before Chris was bigtime he sparred with the great James Toney for years... Arreloa may not be able to beat the Klit's but he's the 3-4 best HW out there IMO... KLit 1, Klit2, Povet3, Arreola4,Gaye5!

I'm pretty sure Valuev was the #3 contender for The Ring-belt when he and David fought, which means he was ranked fourth. He was definately a top HW, which is sad.

Because i'm a biased motherfukker and don't like fatty? Valuev was ranked number 3 HW for a couple of years and Ruiz has one the best if not the best resume at HW. At least better than Chambers, Arreola and Kingpin. If Adamaek loses to Fatass it's also about size difference. If Pavlik fights Pacquiao and beat him up, would you say Pavlik is a better fighter? Yes, that much is obvious. Valuev was never ranked #3 that I remember, and if he was, it certainly was not for longer than a couple of months. I'll also remind you that Valuev, leading up to the Haye fight, had regained his title through WBA politics, who stripped Chagaev, and then robbed a 47 year-old Holyfield to retain his title. Ruiz had not won a fight against a good HW in a lot of time, and his past resume (which is not that good, who has he beat apart from a shot Holyfield?) means nothing, or else the K bros should have to fight 47 year old Holyfield to prove themselves, which is laughable. Adamek is a bit smaller than Arreola, but not much, he says he'll weigh at 220+, while Arreola will probably weigh at 240, give or take a few. Now take the flab of Arreola out of the equation, and there's almost no size difference, unless you think that flab is an advantage.

I'd be very happy to see the fights.

75% in favor of Haye, good. I thought it would be less since so many seem to hate him here, lol.

Valuev and Ruiz two of the best fighters at HW? :rofl: If Arreola beats Adamek he's the better fighter, why would they be fighting for if it's not to prove who's the best fighter? Because i'm a biased motherfukker and don't like fatty? Valuev was ranked number 3 HW for a couple of years and Ruiz has one the best if not the best resume at HW. At least better than Chambers, Arreola and Kingpin. If Adamaek loses to Fatass it's also about size difference. If Pavlik fights Pacquiao and beat him up, would you say Pavlik is a better fighter?