Shannon Briggs has Mars in Pisces

what da hell....i don't understand a thing of what those guys was talking about.. lol. I got that WHAT face on right now!

Not bought on this stuff, but life on earth is from the cosmic dust, and the path and movements of the stars are apparently predictable.

I guess I can understand people having fun with astrology. But to actually take it seriously? That's a bit laughable. But yeah, like I said, as a bit of fun, why not.

Cool thread. Always been interested in the deeper aspects of astrology, even though I don't understand it fully. Imagine getting this shit down to a science and betting based on planets, etc, and actually making some cash? Would be the shit. I'm Gemini sun, Capricorn moon and Virgo rising. Most of my favorite boxers have been born under Gemini as well. Hagler for instance was a Gemini and was unlike the teen gosip shit they try to portray Gemini as (weak). But then again, if you go by sidereal, he'd be a Taurus. My mars is in Gemini btw.

for those not hip to astrology.. Mars in your natal chart is your planet of war. Ideally your mars planet would be in a Fire sign like Aries (planet ruler) Leo, or sagittarius. Or Capricorn which is also exalted. His Planet of war..vitality,assertiveness is in pisces Mars is in 22 Degrees Pisces. Very sensitive and vulnerable, it is difficult for you to assert yourself. At times, you feel quite tired and you will require a lot of sleep in order to maintain your health and your strength. You are at your best when you act without your ego being important. You can be very unselfish and considerate of the needs of others. You get the most satisfaction by giving to others when you expect nothing in return. Beware of a tendency to want always to work behind the scenes or to become overly deceptive by doing things behind others' backs. Im a firm believer in natal astrology... Lazy people tend to have mars in air signs..or cancer, pisces. Sorry dude, the Pacquiao is taking a shit thread has caught all of the forum's attention. :)

jermain taylor is a mars libra hes a musician or poet not a fighter this is a classic artists mars... its opposite of a fighters mars which is aries (evander holyfields placment)

I think you probably know more than anybody else does about yourself. Oh yeah definately. But sometimes you would like to know why things are the way they are.

My link expired. heres a new one. http://www.astro.com/cgi/chart.cgi?clang=e&rs=3&btyp=w2gw&cid=5jwfileFh452C-u1271493788&nhor=1&go.x=17&go.y=5&go=Go Anything U guys can tell me about myself? I think you probably know more than anybody else does about yourself.

My link expired. heres a new one. http://www.astro.com/cgi/chart.cgi?clang=e&rs=3&btyp=w2gw&cid=5jwfileFh452C-u1271493788&nhor=1&go.x=17&go.y=5&go=Go Anything U guys can tell me about myself?

Can you tell me as much as you possibly can about myself from this chart? http://www.astro.com/cgi/showgif.cgi?lang=e&gif=astro_w2gw_01_patrick_ortiz_hp.31458.6672.gif&res=63&va=&cid=5jwfileFh452C-u1271493788

We don't have equal levels of burden of proof, you have the heaviest weight because you are trying to make a definite positive assertion that astrology is true. So like I said before, the burden of proof is on you my friend. Please tell me how inanimate objects affect the personality of a human being. Quick correction cause it'll bug me if i don't point it out, the stars and planets are very animate objects.... however they still don't affect the personality of a human being. I agree with your statement, (after my correction) extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. That hasn't been delivered yet.

Damn this thread got kind of ugly Yall should really tone down the personal attacks I agree, it was/is an interesting discussion. I don't think there is any need for personal attacks, clearly its just a couple of different points of view. I personally don't feel convinced that astrology plays any factor in a boxers career, but that doesn't mean we can't be civil about the debate.

Damn this thread got kind of ugly Yall should really tone down the personal attacks

Wait a second, if you're following due process as it seems you are with your arousals of burden of proof, then shouldn't we be equally circumspect to first establishing all the proper bases and fundamentals? After all, how can we possibly establish a scientific principle if the values that we are using are not consistent? So, if you are to assert the things you're spouting, you must first do so in clear congruence with fact. So first of all, before we are even able to get ahead of ourselves we must first discuss your own mis-steps. After all, you wouldn't start a scientific experiment when you know your instruments are mis-aligned and inaccurate would you? So I say to you, the burden of proof first falls onto YOU to explain why it is you lied and what you meant by stating that this thread was started on the exact premise of proving astrology. I assert that that was not the initial premise for this thread. So since you are trying to disprove it, the burden of proof falls upon you to set this straight and prove to me how this thread was started on that assertion? K I'm waiting. When you prove that, then we'll be able to get a better handle on the foundations of our terminologies and practices and then we can make headway towards legitimizing your challenge. We don't have equal levels of burden of proof, you have the heaviest weight because you are trying to make a definite positive assertion that astrology is true. So like I said before, the burden of proof is on you my friend. Please tell me how inanimate objects affect the personality of a human being.

Yes this thread was trying to make a connection as to how a person's horoscope corresponds to their personality, which in turn has a correlation on how they box. Either way, the burden of proof always weighs heavily on those who are trying to positively assert a claim, and I believe you are trying to claim that astrology is legit. Again I say to you, explain how the allignments of the planet correspond to an individual's personality, more than any other external inanimate object. Wait a second, if you're following due process as it seems you are with your arousals of burden of proof, then shouldn't we be equally circumspect to first establishing all the proper bases and fundamentals? After all, how can we possibly establish a scientific principle if the values that we are using are not consistent? So, if you are to assert the things you're spouting, you must first do so in clear congruence with fact. So first of all, before we are even able to get ahead of ourselves we must first discuss your own mis-steps. After all, you wouldn't start a scientific experiment when you know your instruments are mis-aligned and inaccurate would you? So I say to you, the burden of proof first falls onto YOU to explain why it is you lied and what you meant by stating that this thread was started on the exact premise of proving astrology. I assert that that was not the initial premise for this thread. So since you are trying to disprove it, the burden of proof falls upon you to set this straight and prove to me how this thread was started on that assertion? K I'm waiting. When you prove that, then we'll be able to get a better handle on the foundations of our terminologies and practices and then we can make headway towards legitimizing your challenge.

wrong this thread wasn't made with your stated intention so you're lying again. Rule #5: When someone uses deliberate lies and straw men arguments to disprove a claim then he obviously has an agenda. The burden of proof thus lies on YOU to dispute it, and you are attempting to do so only with deceit and lies so it isn't looking very good for you thus far. Yes this thread was trying to make a connection as to how a person's horoscope corresponds to their personality, which in turn has a correlation on how they box. Either way, the burden of proof always weighs heavily on those who are trying to positively assert a claim, and I believe you are trying to claim that astrology is legit. Again I say to you, explain how the allignments of the planet correspond to an individual's personality, more than any other external inanimate object.

The burden of proof lies on the party making the claim, this thread was created with the intention of legitimizing astrology, so now I ask you a supporter of this belief to explain how it works. Explain how the alignments of the planets has an effect on the personality of human beings. wrong this thread wasn't made with your stated intention so you're lying again. Rule #5: When someone uses deliberate lies and straw men arguments to disprove a claim then he obviously has an agenda. The burden of proof thus lies on YOU to dispute it, and you are attempting to do so only with deceit and lies so it isn't looking very good for you thus far.

Explain to me how it doesn't? Ouch... http://www.funmunch.com/funny_pictures/baby/Owned.jpg The burden of proof lies on the party making the claim, this thread was created with the intention of legitimizing astrology, so now I ask you a supporter of this belief to explain how it works. Explain how the alignments of the planets has an effect on the personality of human beings.

Explain then how planatary alignment controls or predicts a personality more so than the weather that day, the wind speed in china, or the temperature in the city? Explain to me how it doesn't? Ouch... http://www.funmunch.com/funny_pictures/baby/Owned.jpg

Rule #4: if a person attempts to disprove something with zero corroborating evidence, said person is a fraud. http://www.funnystuffblog.com/images/granny-owned.jpg Explain then how planatary alignment controls or predicts a personality more so than the weather that day, the wind speed in china, or the temperature in the city?