There is the level of comp to consider.
There is also some key fights. Calzaghe struggled against Hopkins who was hardly prime.
I would put Calzaghe ahead of Ottke because of his victory over lacy. But Lacy turned out to be a bust all the same.
Cotto fought better fighters throughout his career.
Its impossible to know if Calzaghe was really on the level of Cotto because he never really challenged himself. Even his victory over kessler is admirable but Kessler is more workmanlike (comparable to Margarito) than spectacular.
Cotto was competative against Mayweather, he actually caused Mayweather to reevaluate his training situation. He beat Shane Mosley and even in a losing effort showed tremendous forbearance against the cheating Margarito.
There is really no comparison.
Calzaghe and by a good margin
Undefeated
20 title defenses
Lineal champ in 2 different weight classes..
Cotto is like froch,, good wins, fought everyone, but was never the man in any division
Hopkins Kessler bika lacy > Shane Judah Pauli
i'm glad you made this poll public, now i can have a good laugh at the people who picked Cotto.
i can laugh at you fan of a ****in bitch :DDD remember how this bitch got ko'd in round 1 vs real great ? thats what wouldve happened if he fought a prime rjj. 1st round ko, bitch
Cotto never ducked and dodge nobody he was the last throw back champion, he fought better competion. Joe is decent and has good combos but when things started to get heated he retired..
Cotto is! Way to much in a 0 these days, Cotto fought tough fights from the get go and has taken on top fighters, if he hadnt mabey he'd have an 0 too! Zag is a bitch. U just have to watch their fights too see Miguel is better, Joe slaps for gods sake!
You're kidding right? You gotta be. Cotto never ducked anyone in his life. He'd probably fight Klitschko for the right money.
Then why is he fighting Chavez Jr. when Angulo, Bradley, Williams, and Berto are all calling him out?
You're kidding right? You gotta be. Cotto never ducked anyone in his life. He'd probably fight Klitschko for the right money.
He's a gatekeeper at 30 years old. And he only has a controversial win over one old HOFer on his resume just like Calzaghe does. I don't like Calzaghe either, but the dude has beat better fighters than Cotto has. Hopkins and Mosley are practically wins of the same kind. I'll take Kessler, Bika, Eubank (even if he was old) over guys like Clottey, Torres, Malinaggi, and Zab. And I think Hopkins is a better fighter than Mosley and the Calzaghe-Hopkins fight was less controversial to me than the Cotto-Mosley fight.
Calzaghe gets the nod by far in my view. There's a lot of guys Cotto hasn't fought that he should've too.
You're kidding right? You gotta be. Cotto never ducked anyone in his life. He'd probably fight Klitschko for the right money.
Actually i think Calzaghe is a good boxer, better than Froch but Cotto is the man. People underrate Miguel Cotto big time.
Any chance of you actually giving a reason or reasons why you think Cotto is better then Calzaghe without coming off as a Cotto fanboy?
I know it must be hard but try.
Calslappy? Seriously?
Calzaghe scared of Froch? Seriously?
I think you need to rethink your future on this forum.
Actually i think Calzaghe is a good boxer, better than Froch but Cotto is the man. People underrate Miguel Cotto big time.
Calzaghe gets the nod by far in my view. There's a lot of guys Cotto hasn't fought that he should've too.
Only by your retarded standards.
I got Calzaghe too. But that's not the reason. There should be zero qualms with who Cotto has fought.