I don't get it. He doesn't brag. He seems to be a helpful citizen. Doesn't make excuses. Showed some heart with the hurt bicep, and still getting the ko. 26-0 with 20kos.
When he doesn't hold, his style is actually really explosive, and exciting. Maybe reckless, but exciting nonetheless.
Maybe he's not on the top 3's level, but no one is really saying he is. So why are people hating on him?
I don't see no reason as to why Berto should be hated. Some may not like his style, but he is a good fighter.
Like some have stated, the blame perhaps should be pointed at HBO, for hyping him too early. He evidently had a tough time against Collazo, and a rematch should have been made.
When he fights the likes of a Clottey, Cotto, Mosley....then we can see just how he measures at 147. I'm hoping his team can land Mosley (if he loses to Floyd) or Margarito/Clottey this year.
Bruseles looked shot to me. Hes also only fighting once a year and hes under 30. If he aint shot hes damn sure a bum. And he banked in rounds vs. Jones.
Again with Collazo hes a slick southpaw. Thats why it worked. Who did I call shot just because they lost? Cotto?
zab would beat berto.........
Bruseles looked shot to me. Hes also only fighting once a year and hes under 30. If he aint shot hes damn sure a bum. And he banked in rounds vs. Jones.
Again with Collazo hes a slick southpaw. Thats why it worked. Who did I call shot just because they lost? Cotto?
you dont have to be slick to work yourself out of a clinch.
and yes, thats one of em. you must have a loose definition of "shot".
untrue. you dont HAVE to wrestle with berto. collazo didnt wrestle with him all the time. when he kept his hands free and banged to the body berto got hurt and didnt know what to do other than try to hold more.
like atlas says, you need cooperation to consistently hold your opponent. berto doesnt have the footwork to keep up if turned, plus his balance is horrible. you turn out of his clinch, he's extremely vulnerable.
also, bruseles aint shot. why you always quick to call someone shot if theyre defeated? he's just not on jones' level.
Bruseles looked shot to me. Hes also only fighting once a year and hes under 30. If he aint shot hes damn sure a bum. And he banked in rounds vs. Jones.
Again with Collazo hes a slick southpaw. Thats why it worked. Who did I call shot just because they lost? Cotto?
Berto is so strong that you if you dont attempt to wrestle you'll just be man handled. You could argue that hes the strongest WW right now. I cant see guys moving up beating him yet. Atleast until Alexander, Bradley and Ortiz actually beat someone as fast and as good as Berto is. No one they beat is on Bertos level no matter how bad you think Berto is. Then you throw in the new weight class vs. arguably thee strongest WW that could be a disaster.
On Mike Jones. One day when hes a finished product he could beat some guys but so far his best win is Henry Brusselles a shot fighter who won the first two rounds vs. Jones. Maybe down the road but if he was scheduled to fight Berto on the Pavlik card rather then whoever hes fighting Berto would manhandle him. Hes not experienced enough to deal with that kind of explosive speed, power and strength.
Berto gets crap because of how he looks vs. Slick lefties. He shoukd get props fighting guys with tough styles. Just like Paul Williams. Neither one of them shy away from slick lefthanders who throughout history can give anyone trouble.
untrue. you dont HAVE to wrestle with berto. collazo didnt wrestle with him all the time. when he kept his hands free and banged to the body berto got hurt and didnt know what to do other than try to hold more.
like atlas says, you need cooperation to consistently hold your opponent. berto doesnt have the footwork to keep up if turned, plus his balance is horrible. you turn out of his clinch, he's extremely vulnerable.
also, bruseles aint shot. why you always quick to call someone shot if theyre defeated? he's just not on jones' level.
Berto is so strong that you if you dont attempt to wrestle you'll just be man handled. You could argue that hes the strongest WW right now. I cant see guys moving up beating him yet. Atleast until Alexander, Bradley and Ortiz actually beat someone as fast and as good as Berto is. No one they beat is on Bertos level no matter how bad you think Berto is. Then you throw in the new weight class vs. arguably thee strongest WW that could be a disaster.
On Mike Jones. One day when hes a finished product he could beat some guys but so far his best win is Henry Brusselles a shot fighter who won the first two rounds vs. Jones. Maybe down the road but if he was scheduled to fight Berto on the Pavlik card rather then whoever hes fighting Berto would manhandle him. Hes not experienced enough to deal with that kind of explosive speed, power and strength.
Berto gets crap because of how he looks vs. Slick lefties. He shoukd get props fighting guys with tough styles. Just like Paul Williams. Neither one of them shy away from slick lefthanders who throughout history can give anyone trouble.
dude marcos maidana would beat this guy..........
The PED saga, fighting the same type of style and his fans.
Berto looks like crap according to people on here when they dont realize he fought 2 slick southpaws in a row. A guy should get props for that not shit on.
lol at you referring to urango as slick.
he's strong, but his opponents make him look stronger if they try to wrestle with him which is exactly what quintana tried to do with all his holding and hitting
collazo kept his hands free and busted up berto with body shots. the key is to keep your hands free, do work and spin out.
berto aint that big and he doesnt even fight on the inside.
and yes mike jones beats him. his defense is much tighter, he's more sound technically, has the longer reach, better jab, hits harder and is the more versatile fighter. i'd see left uppercuts in bertos future if he ever stepped in the ring with jones.
it'd be like forrest vs sugar shane all over again.
Berto is so strong that you if you dont attempt to wrestle you'll just be man handled. You could argue that hes the strongest WW right now. I cant see guys moving up beating him yet. Atleast until Alexander, Bradley and Ortiz actually beat someone as fast and as good as Berto is. No one they beat is on Bertos level no matter how bad you think Berto is. Then you throw in the new weight class vs. arguably thee strongest WW that could be a disaster.
On Mike Jones. One day when hes a finished product he could beat some guys but so far his best win is Henry Brusselles a shot fighter who won the first two rounds vs. Jones. Maybe down the road but if he was scheduled to fight Berto on the Pavlik card rather then whoever hes fighting Berto would manhandle him. Hes not experienced enough to deal with that kind of explosive speed, power and strength.
Berto gets crap because of how he looks vs. Slick lefties. He shoukd get props fighting guys with tough styles. Just like Paul Williams. Neither one of them shy away from slick lefthanders who throughout history can give anyone trouble.
you obviously havent seen enough mike jones fights. he's one of the most well-rounded welterweights right now. he's more skilled than berto in just about every single department.
berto would not stop him and i dont think haymon would put him in the ring with jones anyways.
i'd favor bradley, alexander and even ortiz over berto.
bradley and alexander's footwork is too good. bradley would be too elusive for berto since berto's footwork is absolute crap.
alexander fights in such sharp angles that berto would be reduced to swinging and grabbing at air while eating southpaw jabs all night.
now berto could at times impose his physicality on them, but my money would be on his lack of tact, ring knowledge (distance in particular), footwork, upper-body movement and an ability to set up shots all being exploited en route to a fairly easy UD. both of them box circles around him and make him look foolish.
ortiz turns him in the same fashion then knocks him out. the gap in boxing skill b/t those 3 and berto would be too wide to overcome. now you can say that quintana was supposedly the more skilled fighter in their fight and you'd be correct, but all three of those JWW are much more athletic than quintana.
skill + tact + athleticism + footwork = berto loses
spot on :fing02:......Mike Jones spanks Berto RIGHT NOW imo......I've seen about the same number of fights from BOTH Berto and Mike......I don't see how Berto can win fights without opening up wrecklessly......Berto is a KO waiting to happen and as soon as he gets in there with somebody like a Mike Jones or Sugar Shane he's gettin' KTFO.....simple!!....bet the crib on that!
Did you not see how strong Berto was. He was like a Lion who wouldnt get off his prey. He bullied Quintana a former 154 Pounder and then you say you would Ortiz, Bradley and Alexander to beat him at WW? Talk about over the top.
Then Mike Jones beats him? hahahaha No man just no.
he's strong, but his opponents make him look stronger if they try to wrestle with him which is exactly what quintana tried to do with all his holding and hitting
collazo kept his hands free and busted up berto with body shots. the key is to keep your hands free, do work and spin out.
berto aint that big and he doesnt even fight on the inside.
and yes mike jones beats him. his defense is much tighter, he's more sound technically, has the longer reach, better jab, hits harder and is the more versatile fighter. i'd see left uppercuts in bertos future if he ever stepped in the ring with jones.
it'd be like forrest vs sugar shane all over again.
I ask the same of Pacquiao all the time.
The PED saga, fighting the same type of style and his fans.
Berto looks like crap according to people on here when they dont realize he fought 2 slick southpaws in a row. A guy should get props for that not shit on.
you obviously havent seen enough mike jones fights. he's one of the most well-rounded welterweights right now. he's more skilled than berto in just about every single department.
berto would not stop him and i dont think haymon would put him in the ring with jones anyways.
i'd favor bradley, alexander and even ortiz over berto.
bradley and alexander's footwork is too good. bradley would be too elusive for berto since berto's footwork is absolute crap.
alexander fights in such sharp angles that berto would be reduced to swinging and grabbing at air while eating southpaw jabs all night.
now berto could at times impose his physicality on them, but my money would be on his lack of tact, ring knowledge (distance in particular), footwork, upper-body movement and an ability to set up shots all being exploited en route to a fairly easy UD. both of them box circles around him and make him look foolish.
ortiz turns him in the same fashion then knocks him out. the gap in boxing skill b/t those 3 and berto would be too wide to overcome. now you can say that quintana was supposedly the more skilled fighter in their fight and you'd be correct, but all three of those JWW are much more athletic than quintana.
skill + tact + athleticism + footwork = berto loses
Did you not see how strong Berto was. He was like a Lion who wouldnt get off his prey. He bullied Quintana a former 154 Pounder and then you say you would Ortiz, Bradley and Alexander to beat him at WW? Talk about over the top.
Then Mike Jones beats him? hahahaha No man just no.
I think Berto is a cool guys..
I thought he lost vs Collazo.. I think he might win the rematch if it ever happens..
I dont think he a top 3 WW..
Maybe in the same league with Clottey, Cotto..
I really want to see a Cotto vs Berto fight..
Some good points about skilled tacticians like Jones, Alexander, and Bradley.
Don't know about Ortiz and how he would handle the explosive combos though, he might just fold up if he gets hurt again.
green sent in any case.
i understand that people will always question ortiz' heart and label him a quitter until he proves otherwise, so i wont argue that.
i just think he learned his lesson early and is making a more concerted effort to keep his style tight and become a power boxer.
vs berto, ortiz would be the bigger puncher and he's the sharper, more accurate puncher, who knows how to set up his shots (berto doesnt).
he also keeps his hands free, is a good body puncher (collazo beat up berto's body on the inside) and is the much better inside fighter.
i believe that victor's machismo days are over and he now knows what hes gotta do to avoid putting himself in a situation like he was in against maidana.
if the rumors about berto's chin are true, ortiz could make quick work of him.
Clottey's the only one with a chance. Jones is a Joke who has beat anyone. He'd be stopped, and if they ever fought, I'd be glad to bet you. Made a thread asking for peeps to show how Collazo was robbed, but it was ducked. But please, do tell how Berto would do against the top of the 140 divison. Presumeably Bradley and Alex. Alex weighted 147 fight night vs Urango. Berto weighted 153. Some fair fight. How do you see it playing out. The Urango fight was getting worse for Alex until the K.O. The Q fight was getting better for Berto until the stoppage. I think Berto would go seek and destroy on Alex, and stop him late. What do you think?
you obviously havent seen enough mike jones fights. he's one of the most well-rounded welterweights right now. he's more skilled than berto in just about every single department.
berto would not stop him and i dont think haymon would put him in the ring with jones anyways.
i'd favor bradley, alexander and even ortiz over berto.
bradley and alexander's footwork is too good. bradley would be too elusive for berto since berto's footwork is absolute crap.
alexander fights in such sharp angles that berto would be reduced to swinging and grabbing at air while eating southpaw jabs all night.
now berto could at times impose his physicality on them, but my money would be on his lack of tact, ring knowledge (distance in particular), footwork, upper-body movement and an ability to set up shots all being exploited en route to a fairly easy UD. both of them box circles around him and make him look foolish.
ortiz turns him in the same fashion then knocks him out. the gap in boxing skill b/t those 3 and berto would be too wide to overcome. now you can say that quintana was supposedly the more skilled fighter in their fight and you'd be correct, but all three of those JWW are much more athletic than quintana.
skill + tact + athleticism + footwork = berto loses
im not joking. i believe all 4 beat him.
-mike jones is too big and too skilled for him. jones is more skilled and versatile than berto will ever be.
-antwone would out work him. he keeps his hands free, has better stamina and hits harder.
-i thought collazo won the first match and i dont think berto's improved much since, so collazo takes the rematch.
-clottey sharp shoots him and berto gasses trying to crack the shell with bombs and shoe shines.
but yeah, outside of them and the top of the division, berto beats everyone at 147. i wont even get into how i think he'd fare against some of the top 140 lbers.
Clottey's the only one with a chance. Jones is a Joke who has beat anyone. He'd be stopped, and if they ever fought, I'd be glad to bet you. Made a thread asking for peeps to show how Collazo was robbed, but it was ducked. But please, do tell how Berto would do against the top of the 140 divison. Presumeably Bradley and Alex. Alex weighted 147 fight night vs Urango. Berto weighted 153. Some fair fight. How do you see it playing out. The Urango fight was getting worse for Alex until the K.O. The Q fight was getting better for Berto until the stoppage. I think Berto would go seek and destroy on Alex, and stop him late. What do you think?
You've got jokes. Mike Jones hasn't beat a welter as good as Cosme Rivera or Estada. He had to take a step up in class to fight a welter Henry Brussels. Collazo knows what would happen in a rematch, which is why he didn't take it the first time. Hope he wins vs Adyin so one has to happen. Hope Berto stops him too, because if not, they'll just be endless whining like the first time, where I think he lost BTW. A Clottey fight is interesting I'll give you that. He could beat Berto, same as he may have beaten Cotto.
im not joking. i believe all 4 beat him.
-mike jones is too big and too skilled for him. jones is more skilled and versatile than berto will ever be.
-antwone would out work him. he keeps his hands free, has better stamina and hits harder.
-i thought collazo won the first match and i dont think berto's improved much since, so collazo takes the rematch.
-clottey sharp shoots him and berto gasses trying to crack the shell with bombs and shoe shines.
but yeah, outside of them and the top of the division, berto beats everyone at 147. i wont even get into how i think he'd fare against some of the top 140 lbers.