Carl Froch: "Dirrell Showed Skills Against Abraham. But He Ran Against Me." (Audio)

yes carl froch who barely got 700 000 pounds for knocking out taylor paid all those pundits off :rolleyes: I don't think you understand, but its ok that's expected. I have to go now though, please continue....

haha froch got schooled by dirrell,he was punching air all night long

No I don't because they can be bought out and are most likely in it for the money. You didn't answer my question: . yes carl froch who barely got 700 000 pounds for knocking out taylor paid all those pundits off :rolleyes:

no no one cares what those top expexts who know aot more about boxing than both of us have to say :rolleyes: No I don't because they can be bought out and are most likely in it for the money. You didn't answer my question: Did the Carl Froch underwear you had under your nose run out of odor or did you have to order a new pair? It seems like the fumes are still getting to your head.

True story, Froch is a funny guy. I hope he wins the tourney, would deffo shut up a few people on here.

I've gradually started to like Carl Froch more and more as this tournament went on and i've heard him in interviews and watched him on camp 360... He's actually a pretty cool guy... and I've always hated him with a passion... But Calzaghe f*ck that asshole forever lol

fights are scored on entertainment value now are they? Dirrell had no intention of making it a fight as he believed that decisively outboxing an opponent would result in a clear victory for him. Decisively beating an opponent doesn't mean anything if it takes place in britain.The talentless hack Jamie McDonnel got the shit beaten out of him by Ian Napa but because he continued to press,three blind judges awarded him with the decision. british boxing is a complete and utter joke and it's because of bums like froch. Yeah, that same bum that knocked Taylor out and outpointed the WBC Light-Heavyweight champion Pascal. Wether Froch lost the Dirrell fight or not, that fight was resulted by judges. Rediculous that you blame a fighter on a result he had no influence on. Either blame the judges, or blame Dirrell for not wanting to fight.

WOW your in every Carl Froch thread defending him with the same bullshit. Nobody cares what those guys had it scored at its in their best interest to please Showtime. Did the Carl Froch underwear you had under your nose run out of odor or did you have to order a new pair? It seems like the fumes are still getting to your head. no no one cares what those top expexts who know aot more about boxing than both of us have to say :rolleyes:

would be a good analogy if the fights were remotely similar...but the fact that dan rafael, jimmy iowa, ea5tside boxing, boxing scnee, graham houston, steve bunce, the ringside press, allan green, emmanuel stuart etc all scored ot to froch suggests you are talking bulshit... Dirrells punches fell short all night with the best shot being frochs left hook in the 8th round which had dirrells head grusomely spinning. Most of dirrells punches fell short hence why froch was unmarked. If you are looing for effective punches, dirrells nose and lips were bleeding after just 4 rounds and had blood running from his eye after 8...froch was unmarked after 12...says it all. Dirrell threw less than 5 punches a round and ****ed it up... WOW your in every Carl Froch thread defending him with the same bullshit. Nobody cares what those guys had it scored at its in their best interest to please Showtime. Did the Carl Froch underwear you had under your nose run out of odor or did you have to order a new pair? It seems like the fumes are still getting to your head.

fights are scored on entertainment value now are they? Dirrell had no intention of making it a fight as he believed that decisively outboxing an opponent would result in a clear victory for him. Decisively beating an opponent doesn't mean anything if it takes place in britain.The talentless hack Jamie McDonnel got the shit beaten out of him by Ian Napa but because he continued to press,three blind judges awarded him with the decision. british boxing is a complete and utter joke and it's because of bums like froch. would be a good analogy if the fights were remotely similar...but the fact that dan rafael, jimmy iowa, ea5tside boxing, boxing scnee, graham houston, steve bunce, the ringside press, allan green, emmanuel stuart etc all scored ot to froch suggests you are talking bulshit... Dirrells punches fell short all night with the best shot being frochs left hook in the 8th round which had dirrells head grusomely spinning. Most of dirrells punches fell short hence why froch was unmarked. If you are looing for effective punches, dirrells nose and lips were bleeding after just 4 rounds and had blood running from his eye after 8...froch was unmarked after 12...says it all. Dirrell threw less than 5 punches a round and ****ed it up...

i think Froch feels he has a good chance of winning this tourement now after Dirrell got the points from the Abraham fight

****ing halarious interview as per...froch wins everytinme epically when he lets his tongue go.. As for the fight froch spanked dirrell and bullied him all over nottingham...

fights are scored on entertainment value now are they? Dirrell had no intention of making it a fight as he believed that decisively outboxing an opponent would result in a clear victory for him. Decisively beating an opponent doesn't mean anything if it takes place in britain.The talentless hack Jamie McDonnel got the shit beaten out of him by Ian Napa but because he continued to press,three blind judges awarded him with the decision. british boxing is a complete and utter joke and it's because of bums like froch. For once i agree with you, Napa was straight up robbed, same as Dirrell.

In other words, sure i got hit throughout the fight with the cleaner harder shots and even though i know deep down that i lost i will say he ran and act as though i really won the fight.

anyone who says that the froch/dirrell fight was anything other than an extremely close fight that could have gone either way is failing to see the subjective nature of boxing. im english and thought dirrell won by a point but he didnt deserve his victory. he fought like a bitch, running away and making the fight an absolute bore. if it wasnt for froch there wouldnt have been a fight. im glad the judges recognised that. and snopkins... what are u talking about? somepeople on these forums are crazy...

froch beat dirrell,

styles make fights. that said, dirrell beat farl croch.

Sounds about right to me.

Carl Froch shares his thoughts on Andre Dirrell. This is only a 4 minute slice from the interview. For the full interview click the link below. The Froch segment starts about 48 minutes into the show. Full Froch Interview Here . Carl is rite. AD moved backward far too much in their fight. He had his back against the wall with AA and stood his ground and delivered. That said.....yes he did "run" Carl but hey he still beat u......without that home cooked meal you would not be undefeated.

Awesome interview, I'm glad people are listening.